On 15/05/05 22:48 +0100, Matthew Walton wrote:
> .
>
> On 15 May 2005, at 16:17, Rob Kinyon wrote:
> >Right now, P6 has $?SELF and I'm saying that instead of using $?SELF,
> >we should use $self wherever $?SELF would be used. $_ is still the
> >topic and would be the default invocant if you have .
On 15/05/05 11:17 -0400, Rob Kinyon wrote:
> On 5/15/05, Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Autrijus Tang skribis 2005-05-15 19:28 (+0800):
> > > On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 01:19:53PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
> > > > Or was your choice of words poor, and did you not mean to discuss the
> > > > dot's *def
I've taken a shot at starting a Synopsis 27 as well:
http://svn.openfoundry.org/pugs/docs/S27draft.pod
Cheers, Brian
On 10/04/05 09:58 -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 14:02 +0300, Yuval Kogman wrote:
> > Please don't be lazy, everyone, and look at this:
> >
> > http://svn.openfoundry.org/pugs/docs/
> >
> > There are some more drafts that should be reviewed, and more will
> > probably follow.
Per autrijus request, I have written a preliminary Synopsis 26 -- Perl
Documentation. For your ripping apart pleasures:
http://svn.openfoundry.org/pugs/docs/S26draft.pod
Cheers, Brian
On 17/03/05 04:40 +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:09:40PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> > whereas as a native English speaker would probably expect
> >
> > $x = whether($a or $b);
> >
> > So I'm thinking we'll just go back to "true", both for that reason,
> > and because
On 17/03/05 00:49 -0500, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 13:42 -0800, Brian Ingerson wrote:
>
> Well, look over AJS Kwid, and see what you think. The bullet syntax you
> give could work fine as a replacement for what I demonstrate, but I
> think everything else is prett
On 16/03/05 14:56 -0500, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 14:24, Brian Ingerson wrote:
>
> > vs Kwid:
> >
> > `$x > $y` is about as *easy* as it gets in [Perl]
> >
> > Did you really read `perlkwid.kwid`?
>
> Yes, and can yo
On 16/03/05 14:33 -0500, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 14:17, Brian Ingerson wrote:
>
> > Kwid does this by formally changing
> >
> >X<...>
> >
> > into
> >
> >{X...X}
>
> Ok, where is THAT proposal?! I'm
On 16/03/05 13:30 -0500, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 12:25, David Storrs wrote:
>
> > I quite like <> as the bracketing characters. They are
> > visually distinctive, they connect well with their adjacent C/X/L/etc
> > without visually merging into it (compare L with L[foo]), and
On 16/03/05 12:00 -0500, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 13:48, Brian Ingerson wrote:
> > Aaron,
> >
> > Upon reading this, it is unclear to me whether you have read about the
> > Kwid format or you are simply guessing that Kwid is the same syntax
> &g
Aaron,
Upon reading this, it is unclear to me whether you have read about the
Kwid format or you are simply guessing that Kwid is the same syntax
used by Kwiki.
It is not the same format at all. Kwid is merely /inspired/ by Kwiki,
which in turn is inspired by the (more usenix) features of modern
On 03/03/05 11:25 -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 09:30:03AM -0800, Brian Ingerson wrote:
> : Hi all,
> :
> : I'm hacking on pugs. I've added a Config.hs which is generated from the
> : build system's perl's Config.pm. This allows me to ex
Hi all,
I'm hacking on pugs. I've added a Config.hs which is generated from the
build system's perl's Config.pm. This allows me to expose the Perl6 magical
variable $?OS.
There are a lot of other config values that seem like they don't really need
their own global. Things like 'privlib' and 'inst
lly gets things right. Always
check %INC, if you suspect that the wrong versions are being pulled in.
If this happens, use more 'use only' statements to pull in the right
versions.
One failsafe solution is to make sure that all module versions in
questi
On 05/12/02 02:45 -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> I'm going to ask something that's probably going to launch off into a long,
> silly thread. But I'm really curious what the results will be so I'll ask
> it anyway. Think of it as an experiment.
>
> So here's your essay topic:
>
> Explain how
On 04/11/02 17:52 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [Note to all: yes, this is me, despite the weirdities of the quoting
> and headers. This is how it looks when I using mutt out of the box,
> because I haven't yet customized it like I have pine. But I do like
> being able to see my own Unicode c
On 04/11/02 14:09 -0800, Austin Hastings wrote:
>
> --- Rafael Garcia-Suarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Austin Hastings wrote in perl.perl6.language :
> > >
> > > What we've got is an encoding problem at the MUA level. Mark Reed
> > says
> > > my mailer (Yahoo!) tagged a message containing hi
On 04/11/02 12:12 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > If you want "trigraph" support, you'll have to put
> >
> > use encoding 'ugly-american';
> >
> > at the top of your files. ;-) ;-) ;-)
> >
> > Otherwise, it'll be one-character ?fancyops? all the way.
>
> Mmm, I view one-character Unicode
On 30/10/02 13:41 -0800, David Wheeler wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 01:35 PM, Graham Barr wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:25:44PM -0800, Austin Hastings wrote:
> >> --- Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Do these French quotes come through?
> >>>
> >>> @a
On 30/10/02 15:33 -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> On 2002-10-30 at 12:23:53, David Wheeler wrote:
> > This tells me that Mail.app, for some reason, didn't know that it was
> > supposed to use UTF-8 when showing Larry's mail. When I pasted his mail
> > into a UTF-8 document in Emacs, it looked fine.
On 30/10/02 08:36 +1100, Damian Conway wrote:
> Brian Ingerson wrote:
>
> > Speaking of persistence, I just realized I'll need to start thinking about
> > YAML serializations of superpositions. My first cut at it would be:
> >
> > ---
> > letters
On 29/10/02 13:26 -0800, Brian Ingerson wrote:
> On 29/10/02 16:05 -0500, Buddha Buck wrote:
> > I was wondering...
> >
> > How persistant are superpositions? How pervasive are they?
>
> Speaking of persistence, I just realized I'll need to start thinkin
On 29/10/02 14:47 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 10:22 AM -0800 10/29/02, Michael Lazzaro wrote:
> >This is why I am nervous about introducing terms like eigenbunny, etc.
>
> Oh, I dunno, I kind of like it. Of course, now my kids want
> eigenbunny slippers... (Though the trouble with those is th
On 29/10/02 16:05 -0500, Buddha Buck wrote:
> I was wondering...
>
> How persistant are superpositions? How pervasive are they?
Speaking of persistence, I just realized I'll need to start thinking about
YAML serializations of superpositions. My first cut at it would be:
---
letters: !su
On 29/10/02 09:58 -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
> : On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:13:39AM +0200, Markus Laire wrote:
>
> So I would look favorably on finding a replacement for "superposition".
How about "christmasgift" or "gift"?
You don't know what it
This is an interesting tidbit from a longer posting by Oren Ben-Kiki, the
YAML specification author. Thought I'd pass it on.
- Forwarded message from Oren Ben-Kiki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Oren Ben-Kiki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 11:28:12 +0300
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sub
27 matches
Mail list logo
