On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 18:16, Behnam wrote:
Sorry, I didn't intend to put words in your mouth. [...]
No problem. It just made me wonder that you're referring to something
else. I checked it, and I hadn't said that. I'm not that much into
commercial value of software...
roozbeh
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 23:43, Ali A. Khanban wrote:
Mirrored is even better. It is more similar to the way I usually
separate them in handwriting. Put the pen on a paper and then move it to
the top and left, a natural number separator!
I move
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Behnam wrote:
On 11-Jan-04, at 10:40 AM, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 19:06, Behnam wrote:
of improving Farsi computing.
^
Persian? Please?
roozbeh
Now, I like you to have the same pushing approach towards the
BTW, what would the use of Reh instead of proper chars like U+066C or
U+066B do to sort orders or parsing of numeric vs. alphabetic sequences?
For example, a function persian_ispunct() la ANSI C ispunct()
would then have to include Reh as a possible punctuation character.
On Sun, 2004-01-11 at
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Other people like Connie are
sacrificing their life to get our comments and translate it into
pages that the other 90% can understand.
Speaking of which, I'm just today attempting to make a Persian keyboard
for fingers which are used to typing
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 09:02, C Bobroff wrote:
Anyhow, I need some help. I'm just cheating by using Farsiweb's
Persian experimental standard keyboard and rearranging things. Please
tell me why you have included the following. Are they used for Persian?
U+0060 Grave Accent
U+003b Western
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
We did that because we wanted to allow all the ASCII printable
characters. The real need was for things like XML, where some of these
characters are part of the syntax. The user will want to enter Persian
XML without ever switching to a Latin
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 09:20, C Bobroff wrote:
Glad I asked before deleting!
I don't know about these things.
Put them in if you have the space. They'll prove to be necessary. It's
not XML only. It's everything that is considered *rich text*, a text
file that is supposed to mean more than the
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
Put them in if you have the space. They'll prove to be necessary. It's
not XML only. It's everything that is considered *rich text*, a text
file that is supposed to mean more than the exact text. HTML, XML, TeX,
...
Sure, I'll put them.
I wish
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 09:31, C Bobroff wrote:
I wish there was a way to put 2-3 characters on a single keystroke with
this tool. How have they managed that with Rial on the normal keyboards?
There is. Just input multiple characters in the box that asks you for
the character.
roozbeh
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, C Bobroff wrote:
ok! Thank you for your blessing. It is indeed a shame to allow keys to go
unused.
Don't be hasty. Leave some unused for later when we encode new
characters ;).
behdad
-Connie
___
PersianComputing mailing list
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Ali A. Khanban wrote:
Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 18:14, AmirBehzad Eslami wrote:
But don't you think shape of U+066C is very similar to sign of 'foot'
and 'minute'?
(http://students.washington.edu/irina/persianword/afgDecSep.JPG)
Depends on the
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Ali A. Khanban wrote:
Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 18:14, AmirBehzad Eslami wrote:
But don't you think shape of U+066C is very similar to sign of 'foot'
and 'minute'?
Thanks to Connie who convinced me.
It seems using of U+066C is the best
option.
But don't you think shape of U+066C is very
similar to sign of 'foot' and 'minute'? (http://students.washington.edu/irina/persianword/afgDecSep.JPG)
Bedrood,Behzad
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 18:14, AmirBehzad Eslami wrote:
But don't you think shape of U+066C is very similar to sign of 'foot'
and 'minute'?
(http://students.washington.edu/irina/persianword/afgDecSep.JPG)
Depends on the font. Compare with
http://www.bamdad.org/~roozbeh/thsep.png, for example.
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 07:18, C Bobroff wrote:
Make a model website [...] and use [...] Weft [...] so everyone can
see how it's done.
Not everyone can see Weft-enabled web pages:
1) It's a closed standard, so not everyone can implement it. Mozilla,
Netscape, and Linux users won't be able to
16 matches
Mail list logo