From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 2:46 AM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] postgres and emacs on windows os
hi all,
has anybody experience using psql with emacs (M-x sql-postgres) on
Or what about automatically unsubscribing at that point? (In spite
of other ways it's awful, mailman does that rather well.)
... and voila, you (and now myself) could have been unsubscribed
yourself on this mail... it's not that hard to have any specific string
by mistake on your subject
could you suggest good books for a beginner learning PostgreSQL database.
thanks
rao.a.v
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
As much as I dislike majordomo, I'm not seeing a strong argument here
for replacing it. As far as I can tell, there are no problems with our
using it: the unsubscribe-in-subject thing was added to pgsql-general
and seems to be working just fine.
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 02:11:11PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Actually, what I'd like to see done is to get majordomo to bounce list
messages containing unsubscribe in the subject, with an explanatory
message about the right way to unsubscribe. There's no reason the
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So I don't think we should do anything about it. It's not really a
serious problem.
Actually, what I'd like to see done is to get majordomo to bounce list
messages containing unsubscribe in the subject, with an
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Actually it is quite ridiculous that we expect someone to read the mail
headers.
But relatively reasonable to assume that one could unsubscribe if they
can figure out how to subscribe..
--
Until later, Geoffrey
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase
It just occurred to me. The purpose of normalizing the information and
having it stored on two separate tables is defeated if I have another
table that contains the same information but in an un-normalized
fashion. I would end up with two copies of the same information, one
normalized but not
Hi Brandon, thanks for answering.
The information regarding a transaction is stored on two separate
tables due to normalization. The first table stores general information
regarding the transaction like Transaction number, date, customer ID,
type of transaction, userID etc... The second table
am Thu, dem 07.09.2006, um 15:58:14 -0400 mailte venkata rao folgendes:
could you suggest good books for a beginner learning PostgreSQL database.
Visit our homepage and read http://www.postgresql.org/docs/books/
HTH, Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47215, D1:
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, venkata rao wrote:
could you suggest good books for a beginner learning PostgreSQL database.
The Douglas and Douglas book -- second edition -- is excellent as an
introduction to PostgreSQL. If you want to learn SQL, any book by Joe Celko
will be the best you can do. It's
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, venkata rao wrote:
could you suggest good books for a beginner learning PostgreSQL database.
Although being an old book, Bruce Momjian's PostgreSQL: Introduction
and Concepts can be a good start, especially for people, who haven't
used SQL before.
On Sep 7, 2006, at 3:31 PM, andy rost wrote:
a) The system load is 20
b) WCPU values for the 14 active pgpool processes exceed 20%
c) Context switching on the server jumps as high as 250,000
The application now takes 4 (with pgpool) rather than less than two
hours (without pgpool) to
Actually, I don't think you need Table 2 at all. Rather, you can fairly
easily incorporate all the functionality of CurrentCountTable into Table
2 and then use a query or a VIEW.
Say you have these two tables. [I'm not the best at data modeling yet,
so I wouldn't necessarily take these
I need to fetch strings from a database with ECPG and then sort them in
C. Here is one of my failed attempts:
###
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
int maxlen=20;
long nrec;
EXEC SQL BEGIN DECLARE SECTION;
varchar filenms[][maxlen]=NULL;
char dbnm[50];
EXEC SQL
Matthew Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is the proc that has very inconsistent (anywhere from 25ms to
8000ms) performance:
...
This setup, with concurrency, is returning very inconsistent query
performance. Sometimes its very fast, other times it's slow and waits.
This makes me
Please don't use reply to start new thread, thanks.
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 05:55:44AM -0800, Poul Jensen wrote:
I need to fetch strings from a database with ECPG and then sort them in
C. Here is one of my failed attempts:
snip
varchar filenms[][maxlen]=NULL;
I think you need to reread the
I began learning PostgreSQL a couple of years ago, having worked previously
with Paradox. I would agree with a previous responder that the Douglas
Douglas book "PostgreSQL: the comprehensive guide to building,
programming, and administering PostgreSQL databases" 2nd ed. is a good
book.
x-no-archive:yes
Hello.
I have a stored procedure which returns a setof record. The function
takes a few arguments, and if a couple of specific input values are
null, it is required that the stored procedure perform different
actions.
I know that the planner does not store the plan when
Is there a way to determine the needed amount of fsm pages?
I have a database that I started with 1,000,000 max_fsm_pages and I was
doing vacuum analyze verboze daily. Checked every couple of days to make
sure we had the right amount of fsm pages.
A few days ago I noticed that we got the
On 8 Sep 2006 11:57:54 -0700, Karen Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that the planner does not store the plan when EXECUTE is used in
a function, but the function looks better when the sql is created
dynamically.
my general rule is use static when you can, dynamic when you have to.
this is
On Sep 8, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Francisco Reyes wrote:
I have a database that I started with 1,000,000 max_fsm_pages and I
was doing vacuum analyze verboze daily. Checked every couple of
days to make sure we had the right amount of fsm pages.
A few days ago I noticed that we got the notice
Sure. Any RDBMS can do that. Just create
a user account (login role for PostgreSQL) and only grant the INSERT privilege
to them on your tables, then connect with that account with your program. Any
DELETE or UPDATE statements will automatically fail.
--
Brandon
Aiken
Merlin Moncure wrote:
On 8 Sep 2006 11:57:54 -0700, Karen Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that the planner does not store the plan when EXECUTE is used in
a function, but the function looks better when the sql is created
dynamically.
my general rule is use static when you can,
Don't forget that one can create a DO NOTHING rules for DELETE and
UPDATE in addition to the INSERT only privilege. This will prevent
even the owner of the table from doing any accidental updating or
deleting.
Brandon Aiken wrote:
Sure. Any RDBMS can do that. Just create a user account
Vivek Khera writes:
how many actual pages of data (and index) do you have? you want to
see how many relpages you're relations are using in the pg_class
view.
In 1 database:
select relname,relpages,reltuples from pg_class order by reltuples desc
limit 7;
relname |
On 9/8/06, Brandon Aiken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. Any RDBMS can do that. Just create a user account (login role for
PostgreSQL) and only grant the INSERT privilege to them on your tables, then
connect with that account with your program. Any DELETE or UPDATE
statements will
On 8 Sep 2006 14:39:54 -0700, Karen Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Merlin Moncure wrote:
you could of course do:
FOR rec IN SELECT * FROM test WHERE $1 is null or mydate $1 loop [...]
or some such.
This was a simple example. In reality, the structure of the query is
altered, but there are
Setting postgresql 8.1.3 to log all queries only logs direct queries, not ones made as part of a stored procedure (function) call.Is there a way to get it to log queries that are part of functions?--Mike Nolan
On 9/8/06, Michael Nolan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Setting postgresql 8.1.3 to log all queries only logs direct queries,
not ones made as part of a stored procedure (function) call.
Is there a way to get it to log queries that are part of functions?
not really, but you can 'raise notice'
30 matches
Mail list logo
