On 12/17/13, 4:53 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
Well, I'm specifically thinking of master partition tables. In that
case, we really want an INSTEAD OF trigger.
/me scratches head.
So, put a BEFORE trigger, and make it return NULL. Same effect,
different notation.
But it's not the same effect at
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Marko Tiikkaja ma...@joh.to wrote:
On 12/17/13, 4:53 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
Well, I'm specifically thinking of master partition tables. In that
case, we really want an INSTEAD OF trigger.
/me scratches head.
So, put a BEFORE trigger, and make it return
On 12/16/2013 07:53 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
So, put a BEFORE trigger, and make it return NULL. Same effect,
different notation.
NOT the same:
Master partition table with BEFORE trigger:
josh=# insert into a ( id, val ) values ( 23, 'test' ), ( 24, 'test'),
(25,'test');
INSERT 0 0
^^^
Hackers,
I've looked in the archives, but I can't find a reason why INSTEAD OF
triggers were never enabled for tables. I'm interested in them in order
to return a rowcount to JDBC for INSERTs into partitioned tables.
Was there a technical obstacle, or is this just a TUIT issue?
--
Josh Berkus
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
I've looked in the archives, but I can't find a reason why INSTEAD OF
triggers were never enabled for tables.
What would that mean exactly? And how would you do the actual update
when it came time to?
Was there a technical obstacle, or is this just a
On 12/16/2013 04:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
I've looked in the archives, but I can't find a reason why INSTEAD OF
triggers were never enabled for tables.
What would that mean exactly? And how would you do the actual update
when it came time to?
Well, I'm
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 12/16/2013 04:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
I've looked in the archives, but I can't find a reason why INSTEAD OF
triggers were never enabled for tables.
What would that mean exactly? And
