Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-27 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Ian Barwick wrote: > On 17/10/15 04:31, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Robert Haas wrote: > >>> The other item on me is the documentation patch by Emre Hasegeli for > >>> usage of the inclusion opclass framework in BRIN. I think it needs some > >>> slight revision by some native English speaker and

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-27 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Craig Ringer wrote: > On 14 October 2015 at 09:57, Robert Haas wrote: > > We've got a few open items remaining at > > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items - we should > > try to get rid of them. > > I'd like to add, rather than remove, one. A bug in

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-27 Thread Craig Ringer
On 14 October 2015 at 09:57, Robert Haas wrote: > We've got a few open items remaining at > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items - we should > try to get rid of them. I'd like to add, rather than remove, one. A bug in replication origins support. It

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-25 Thread Ian Barwick
On 17/10/15 04:31, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >>> The other item on me is the documentation patch by Emre Hasegeli for >>> usage of the inclusion opclass framework in BRIN. I think it needs some >>> slight revision by some native English speaker and I'm not completely in >>> love

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-17 Thread Simon Riggs
On 16 October 2015 at 20:17, Robert Haas wrote: >> - DDL deparsing testing module should have detected that transforms > >> were not supported, but it failed to notice that. There's no thread > >> linked to this one either, but the description of the issue seems > >>

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-17 Thread Tom Lane
Simon Riggs writes: > On 16 October 2015 at 20:17, Robert Haas wrote: - DDL deparsing testing module should have detected that transforms were not supported, but it failed to notice that. There's no thread linked to this one either,

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-16 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Andres Freund wrote: >>> What would happen if we didn't do anything at all? >> >> Nothing, really. It's essentially some code beautification. A worthwhile >> goal, but

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-16 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> - Oversize item computation needs more testing (c.f. ereport(ERROR) >> calls in brin_getinsertbuffer). This is pretty vague, and there's no >> thread linked. If there's a stability issue

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-16 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Alvaro Herrera > wrote: > > Robert Haas wrote: > >> - Oversize item computation needs more testing (c.f. ereport(ERROR) > >> calls in brin_getinsertbuffer). This is pretty vague, and there's no > >> thread linked.

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-16 Thread Stephen Frost
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > We've got a few open items remaining at > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items - we should > try to get rid of them. Of the 8 items there, 3 are documentation > issues. It looks to me like one of those is for Stephen to deal

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-15 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Robert Haas wrote: > - Oversize item computation needs more testing (c.f. ereport(ERROR) > calls in brin_getinsertbuffer). This is pretty vague, and there's no > thread linked. If there's a stability issue here, presumably it falls > to Alvaro to fix it. But I don't know who added this item or

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-15 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Andres Freund wrote: >> What would happen if we didn't do anything at all? > > Nothing, really. It's essentially some code beautification. A worthwhile > goal, but certainly not a release blocker. While I agree with this assessment, I think

Re: [HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-14 Thread Andres Freund
On 2015-10-13 21:57:15 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > - Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little. > Andres seems to think this shouldn't be an open issue, while Peter > thinks maybe it should be, or at least that's my imperfect executive > summary. Heikki isn't sure he agrees

[HACKERS] remaining open items

2015-10-13 Thread Robert Haas
We've got a few open items remaining at https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items - we should try to get rid of them. Of the 8 items there, 3 are documentation issues. It looks to me like one of those is for Stephen to deal with, one for Andres, and one for Alvaro. Is there any