[PATCHES] Implementing RESET CONNECTION ...

2004-12-30 Thread Hans-Jürgen Schönig
We have implemented a patch which can be used by connection pools for instance. RESECT CONNECTION cleans up a backend so that it can be reused. Temp tables, LISTEN / NOTIFY stuff, WITH HOLD cursors, open transactions, prepared statements and GUCs are cleaned up. I hope we have not missed importan

[PATCHES] Win32 version numbers not correct (again, but this one is easy)

2004-12-30 Thread Magnus Hagander
Seems to be a neverending story :-) Version numbers don't update properly on postgres.exe when doing make clean/make. It works for all other exes and dlls. I beleive this is just a case of "make clean" not properly removing "win32ver.o". See attached patch. //Magnus <> backend_clean.patch Des

Re: [PATCHES] Win32 version numbers not correct (again, but this one is easy)

2004-12-30 Thread Tom Lane
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Version numbers don't update properly on postgres.exe when doing make > clean/make. It works for all other exes and dlls. I beleive this is just > a case of "make clean" not properly removing "win32ver.o". See attached > patch. Hmm, is that the only

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Bgwriter behavior

2004-12-30 Thread Simon Riggs
On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 22:21, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Should we consider at least adjusting the meaning of bgwriter_percent? Yes. As things stand, this is the only change that seems safe. Here's a very short patch that implements this change within BufferSync in bufmgr.c - No algorithm changes -

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Bgwriter behavior

2004-12-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 22:21, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Should we consider at least adjusting the meaning of bgwriter_percent? > > Yes. As things stand, this is the only change that seems safe. > > Here's a very short patch that implements this change within BufferSync > in buf

Re: [PATCHES] Win32 version numbers not correct (again, but this one

2004-12-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > "Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Version numbers don't update properly on postgres.exe when doing make > > clean/make. It works for all other exes and dlls. I beleive this is just > > a case of "make clean" not properly removing "win32ver.o". See attached > > patc

Re: [PATCHES] Win32 version numbers not correct (again, but this one is easy)

2004-12-30 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Hmm, is that the only place we missed it? Might be worth diffing a make >> distclean'd tree against a virgin one. > I was under the impression we only wanted a new version number with a > configure run, however, I can see that "make clean" perhaps shoul

[PATCHES] reqd patch

2004-12-30 Thread ramesh phule
Dear Sir, I am working as Teacher in college. I am teaching PostgreSQL to student. I am facing problem in running CURSOR. version of postgresql is 7.3.2 Cursor creation and fetching works fine. but , 1) refcursor datatype is not recognised by postgres 2) fetch curs1 into cu

Re: [PATCHES] reqd patch

2004-12-30 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 09:26:48PM -0800, ramesh phule wrote: > Subject: [PATCHES] reqd patch > To: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org I'm not sure what "reqd patch" has to do with your question -- a subject with the word "cursor" would be more appropriate since that's the topic. Also, pgsql-patches i