[PATCHES] Blocked post

2007-04-01 Thread Simon Riggs
I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm not sure what the problem is? Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00 Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00 -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterpr

Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post

2007-04-01 Thread Magnus Hagander
Simon Riggs wrote: > I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice > now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm > not sure what the problem is? > > Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00 > Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00 Did you by any chance send it in .t

Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post

2007-04-02 Thread Simon Riggs
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 19:40 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice > > now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm > > not sure what the problem is? > > > > Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01

Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post

2007-04-02 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 03:08:08PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 19:40 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > Simon Riggs wrote: > > > I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice > > > now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'

Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post

2007-04-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Simon Riggs wrote: > I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice > now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm > not sure what the problem is? > > Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00 > Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00 What an obvious ploy to get more ti

Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post

2007-04-02 Thread Gregory Stark
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Plaintext patch, plus two plaintext .c files. > > Then I have no clue. Actually I've had more success with .tar.gz than plain text attachments. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---

Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post

2007-04-02 Thread Dave Page
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: >> I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice >> now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm >> not sure what the problem is? >> >> Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00 >> Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00 > > Wha

Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post

2007-04-02 Thread Tom Lane
Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Plaintext patch, plus two plaintext .c files. >> >> Then I have no clue. > Actually I've had more success with .tar.gz than plain text attachments. I think the filter is not on the name or actual conte

Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post

2007-04-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Dave Page wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Simon Riggs wrote: > >> I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice > >> now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm > >> not sure what the problem is? > >> > >> Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00 > >> Sen

Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post

2007-04-02 Thread Dave Page
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Dave Page wrote: >> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> Simon Riggs wrote: I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm not sure what the problem is? Sent: 31 Mar

Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post

2007-04-02 Thread Magnus Hagander
Tom Lane wrote: > Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Plaintext patch, plus two plaintext .c files. >>> Then I have no clue. > >> Actually I've had more success with .tar.gz than plain text attachments. > > I think the filter is not on

Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post

2007-04-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Dave Page wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Dave Page wrote: > >> Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>> Simon Riggs wrote: > I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice > now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm > not sure what the pro