Bruce Momjian wrote:
Do people want the server file logging/rotating patch applied if it is
Unix-only? Right now the patch is ifdef'ed so Win32 use of it is
disabled.
Andreas is asking.
Please commit ASAP. Is I stated several times, I'll do the win32 as soon
as I get a chance to. It's not a
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Do people want the server file logging/rotating patch applied if it
is Unix-only? Right now the patch is ifdef'ed so Win32 use of it is
disabled.
How is logging typically handled on Windows?
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Do people want the server file logging/rotating patch applied if it
is Unix-only? Right now the patch is ifdef'ed so Win32 use of it is
disabled.
How is logging typically handled on Windows?
It is done using the eventlog service (which is supported as
It's better than no patch I think.
/D
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 7/31/2004 5:33 AM
To: Dave Page
Cc: Tom Lane; Andreas Pflug; PostgreSQL Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Admin functions contrib
Do people want the server file logging
Do people want the server file logging/rotating patch applied if it is
Unix-only? Right now the patch is ifdef'ed so Win32 use of it is
disabled.
I'm slightly worried that we might be painting ourselves into a corner,
ie implementing functionality that will never work on Windows.
Personally,
Tom Lane wrote:
Do people want the server file logging/rotating patch applied if it is
Unix-only? Right now the patch is ifdef'ed so Win32 use of it is
disabled.
I'm slightly worried that we might be painting ourselves into a corner,
ie implementing functionality that will never work on Windows.
This logging issue has drained a lot of time during feature freeze when
we should be getting existing patches in and completed.
I am willing to apply a perfect patch but I am not willing to spend
anymore time on this than I have to. This is all something that
shouldn't be happening during
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 July 2004 18:41
To: Andreas Pflug
Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL Patches; Dave Page
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Admin functions contrib
Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
So, I
Dave Page wrote:
As Bruce has seen, this is some pretty nice functionality that
Andreas has added to pga3, and is one of the few areas that we
lag behind SQL Server etc. in on the management front.
If you're curious what Bruce has seen, it was this:
Andreas Pflug wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
As Bruce has seen, this is some pretty nice functionality that
Andreas has added to pga3, and is one of the few areas that we
lag behind SQL Server etc. in on the management front.
If you're curious what Bruce has seen, it was this:
Dave Page wrote:
Also, what happens if you find that the contrib package
doesn't do everything you need? You'll be stuck for another
PG release cycle, whereas rejiggering a plperl function that
pgadmin is defining for itself is no problem.
pgAdmin I used to create helper functions
-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 July 2004 18:41
To: Andreas Pflug
Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL Patches; Dave Page
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Admin functions contrib
Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
So, I suggest we get the logging code
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I talked to Tom about this today. First, I want to apologize for
running you around in circles in this. I don't think we are giving it
the attention it needs because of our schedule. I also think the
functionality is drifting into the new features territory and this is
also
Andreas Pflug wrote:
So, I suggest we get the logging code into the backend, and you can code
anything you want pgadmin to do in plperlu, and Win32 supports plperlu
too. The big advantage is that you can improve the plperlu functions
with every release of pgadmin.
I do not agree on
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Basically I think we are converging on an answer that we can't do any of
this for 7.5.
If it's not going into the distribution as contrib or core, I'll package
that as additional admin pack. I'm quite sure I can convince the win32
installer packager guys to include that as
Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
So, I suggest we get the logging code into the backend, and you can code
anything you want pgadmin to do in plperlu, and Win32 supports plperlu
too. The big advantage is that you can improve the plperlu functions
with every release
I talked to Tom about this today. First, I want to apologize for
running you around in circles in this. I don't think we are giving it
the attention it needs because of our schedule. I also think the
functionality is drifting into the new features territory and this is
also part of the delay
17 matches
Mail list logo
