Hi lyn
I have the same experience than sven.
Stef
-Lyn
I think that with the current options in the tools (auto generation of
accessors based on instance variables, checking references to instance
variables, renaming either accessors or instance variables, syntax coloring)
the difference b
>
> Nobody has shown me a good reason for their existence and I never use them
> except where I'm forced to use them in Spec
How so? Spec requires only read accessor for your (sub)components.
Hi,
This is a bugbear for me.
On 2015/09/30 09:35 PM, Lyn Headley wrote:
Hello,
As I understand it, in Smalltalk, the instance variables of a class C
are "protected" - able to be referenced by methods of C or its
subclasses, but not by other objects. This is a useful feature as it
clearly po
Hi,
> On 30 Sep 2015, at 21:35, Lyn Headley wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> As I understand it, in Smalltalk, the instance variables of a class C are
> "protected" - able to be referenced by methods of C or its subclasses, but
> not by other objects. This is a useful feature as it clearly points out wh
Hello,
As I understand it, in Smalltalk, the instance variables of a class C are
"protected" - able to be referenced by methods of C or its subclasses, but
not by other objects. This is a useful feature as it clearly points out
which pieces of data are not available to other objects, and thereby
s