Hi John,
> Does pico have PDF functions? I was considering implenting something in
> that area.
There is "lib/ps.l". It is a set of functions that generate PostScript
pages, which are then usually converted to PDF (or directly sent to a
printer).
The primary function for that is 'psOut'. You ca
Hi all,
Does pico have PDF functions? I was considering implenting something in
that area.
John
Also, I am still having problems getting the PDF function working
properly (i.e., finding useable fonts other than Courier).
Hi Anthony,
It could be fun to play with a Pico Lisp Cocoa application, but
generally I prefer to write stuff that's more platform independent.
/Jon
think that specifying the target in the Makefile does not permit
one to optimize for the local system, in my case for MacOS 10.5, and
it is d
Alex & Jon;
Jon the explanation provided by Alex is what I meant regarding
optimization:
On Apr 7, 2008, at 8:33 AM, Alexander Burger wrote:
Hi Jon,
I'm not sure what you mean by "added Os optimization level". Could
It might make sense to write
gcc -c -Os -pipe \
instead of
Hi Alex,
If I comment out the "export MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.4" and try to
(cd simul/gl; make) on my old PPC Mac (with OSX 10.4.11), I get this:
gcc -c -O -pipe \
-falign-functions -fomit-frame-pointer \
-W -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wunused -Wformat \
-Wuninitialized -Wstrict-prototypes \
-
Hi Jon,
> I'm not sure what you mean by "added Os optimization level". Could
It might make sense to write
gcc -c -Os -pipe \
instead of
gcc -c -O -pipe \
meaning "optimize for space".
It is usually hard to decide what optimization level to use.
The picoLisp Makefile current
Hi Anthony,
I'm not sure what you mean by "added Os optimization level". Could
you show me the details?
/Jon
Jon;
Really good work. I downloaded and compiled on my MacOS 10.5 system
and it seems to work well. I made some changes to your Makefile
based on what Alex has been doing with t