On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 13:59:02 +0100
"Ben Avison" wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 12:21:03 +0100, Pekka Paalanen
> wrote:
>
> > But if I'll rework the lookup tables, I can rework this too. Would be
> > my pleasure, even, getting acquainted with Pixman style. :-)
>
> I made some revisions to affine
On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 12:21:03 +0100, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
But if I'll rework the lookup tables, I can rework this too. Would be
my pleasure, even, getting acquainted with Pixman style. :-)
I made some revisions to affine-bench.c (and a couple of tweaks to
lowlevel-blt-bench.c and pixman.c too
There are many types of composite operation that are useful to benchmark but
which are omitted from the table. Continually having to add extra entries to
the table is a nuisance and is prone to human error, so this patch adds the
ability to break down unknow strings of the format
_[_[_ca]
where b
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 19:26:22 +0100
Ben Avison wrote:
> There are many types of composite operation that are useful to benchmark but
> which are omitted from the table. Continually having to add extra entries to
> the table is a nuisance and is prone to human error, so this patch adds the
> abilit
There are many types of composite operation that are useful to benchmark but
which are omitted from the table. Continually having to add extra entries to
the table is a nuisance and is prone to human error, so this patch adds the
ability to break down unknow strings of the format
_[_[_ca]
where b