Your message dated Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:18:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#575310: fixed in hydrogen 0.9.4-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #575310,
regarding hydrogen: segfaults right after start-up
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Accepted:
hydrogen_0.9.4-4.debian.tar.gz
to main/h/hydrogen/hydrogen_0.9.4-4.debian.tar.gz
hydrogen_0.9.4-4.dsc
to main/h/hydrogen/hydrogen_0.9.4-4.dsc
hydrogen_0.9.4-4_amd64.deb
to main/h/hydrogen/hydrogen_0.9.4-4_amd64.deb
Override entries for your package:
hydrogen_0.9.4-4.dsc - sourc
hydrogen_0.9.4-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
hydrogen_0.9.4-4.dsc
hydrogen_0.9.4-4.debian.tar.gz
hydrogen_0.9.4-4_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
_
Hello9
Dear friends,
I'm sorry, wasted your valuable time, we are chinese a major international
trading electronics
wholesale company.
Our company's electronic products have the best quality, cheapest price and
best service.
If you have time to buy 5 products that can free you of the p
Your message dated Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:10:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#573472: fixed in liblo 0.26~repack-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #573472,
regarding Updating the liblo Uploaders list
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:10:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#575329: fixed in liblo 0.26~repack-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #575329,
regarding liblo7: package description formating issues
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Accepted:
liblo-dev_0.26~repack-5_amd64.deb
to main/libl/liblo/liblo-dev_0.26~repack-5_amd64.deb
liblo-tools_0.26~repack-5_amd64.deb
to main/libl/liblo/liblo-tools_0.26~repack-5_amd64.deb
liblo7_0.26~repack-5_amd64.deb
to main/libl/liblo/liblo7_0.26~repack-5_amd64.deb
liblo_0.26~repack-5.d
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:58:27PM +,
fsateler-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 4752d5751729d28e9e321314d8775222f8321906
Author: Felipe Sateler
Date: Wed Mar 24 19:54:14 2010 -0300
Use regular spaces instead of hard
tags 575329 pending
thanks
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 19:26, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Package: liblo7
> Version: 0.26~repack-4
> Severity: minor
>
> Hello!
>
> There is a minor issue in the package description: There aren't two
> spaces infront of the * "Bundles" line in the package descripti
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 575329 pending
Bug #575329 [liblo7] liblo7: package description formating issues
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
liblo_0.26~repack-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
liblo_0.26~repack-5.dsc
liblo_0.26~repack-5.diff.gz
liblo-dev_0.26~repack-5_amd64.deb
liblo7_0.26~repack-5_amd64.deb
liblo-tools_0.26~repack-5_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Package: liblo7
Version: 0.26~repack-4
Severity: minor
Hello!
There is a minor issue in the package description: There aren't two
spaces infront of the * "Bundles" line in the package description but
one space and one hardspace (0xA0). This confuses the package renderer
in aptitude. :)
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:11:58PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
AK>* audio.conf handling. Right now, it cannot be tweaked by the user.
AK> Sure it can, but the package will overwrite it on updates. Though
AK> this will be fine in almost all cases (we provide a sensible
AK>
Hi Adrian,
|--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:49:51 +0100, Adrian Knoth
said:
AK> I completely agree with you: it has more features, it is stable, and I'm
AK> also using it instead of jackd1.
AK> If you don't fear the lack of Debian-wide testing, go ahead and upload
AK> 1.9.5 to unstable. T
Hi,
|--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:53:15 +0100, Adrian Knoth
said:
AK> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:34:07PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
AK> [jackd2 over jackd1]
>>> jack1) and apparently is what the upstream recommends as well.
>>
>>I see no such thing on their webpage, nor in their mai
Package: hydrogen
Severity: serious
Version: 0.9.4-3
Hi,
I just wanted to try out hydrogen and it instantly results
in a segfault before I see anything of the GUI.
I run this on:
Linux pagefault 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Jan 10 22:40:40 UTC 2010 x86_64
GNU/Linux
I built a package with debug
Accepted:
amsynth_1.2.2-2.diff.gz
to main/a/amsynth/amsynth_1.2.2-2.diff.gz
amsynth_1.2.2-2.dsc
to main/a/amsynth/amsynth_1.2.2-2.dsc
amsynth_1.2.2-2_i386.deb
to main/a/amsynth/amsynth_1.2.2-2_i386.deb
Override entries for your package:
amsynth_1.2.2-2.dsc - source sound
amsynth_1.2.2-2_
amsynth_1.2.2-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
amsynth_1.2.2-2.dsc
amsynth_1.2.2-2.diff.gz
amsynth_1.2.2-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
___
pkg-multi
FYI: The status of the qtractor source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.4.3-1
Current version: 0.4.5-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receiv
FYI: The status of the liblo source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.23-2.2
Current version: 0.26~repack-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will re
FYI: The status of the nekobee source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.1.6-1
Current version: 0.1.7-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the jamin source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.95.0-4
Current version: 0.97.14~cvs~81203-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you w
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:34:07PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
[jackd2 over jackd1]
> > jack1) and apparently is what the upstream recommends as well.
>
> I see no such thing on their webpage, nor in their mailing list
> (although I don't pay that much attention there).
This was also new to me
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 04:26:01PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> Hi,
Hi!
> So, my opinion is that we should definitely have jack2 in squeeze,
> because it seems to be better (that is more features, and as stable as
> jack1) and apparently is what the upstream recommends as well. FWIW I've
> bee
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:26, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> So, my opinion is that we should definitely have jack2 in squeeze,
> because it seems to be better (that is more features, and as stable as
> jack1) and apparently is what the upstream recommends as well.
I see no such thing on their webpage
Hi,
|--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:08:10 +0100, Reinhard Tartler
said:
RT> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:28:42 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote:
RT> there is currently a vote on this ongoing right now...
>>
>>I'm sorry, I think I missed it, can you point me to it?
RT> hm. it seems the messag
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:28:42 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> RT> there is currently a vote on this ongoing right now...
>
> I'm sorry, I think I missed it, can you point me to it?
hm. it seems the message at
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2010-March/0084
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:28:42PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> Hi Reinhard,
> |--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:13:12 +0100, Reinhard Tartler
> said:
> RT> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 23:30:56 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> >>|--==> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:48:45 +, Archive Administrator
> sai
Hi Reinhard,
|--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:13:12 +0100, Reinhard Tartler
said:
RT> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 23:30:56 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>|--==> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:48:45 +, Archive Administrator
said:
>>
AA> Reject Reasons:
AA> Source package jack-audio
Hi Andrian,
|--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:17:59 +0100, Adrian Knoth
said:
AK> Why 1.9.4+something and not 1.9.5?
Sorry, I meant 1.9.5-1.
AK> I'd like to sort out the config file issue (dpkg vs. ucf), but we could
AK> probably upload d2c23abd119cdf7f40654fa443e2a51cf6265893, that is,
A
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt writes:
> Felipe Sateler writes:
>> As far as I can tell, no reverse build-dep of liblo is involved in the
>> current ghc or hdf transitions. Can we upload new liblo to unstable and
>> schedule binNMUs?
> Yes, I guess so. Please go ahead.
It's now in testing. Wasn't smooth
31 matches
Mail list logo
