Re: [Plplot-devel] The changes to freetype I made today

2007-01-18 Thread Andrew Roach
At 07:43 AM 18/01/2007 -0800, you wrote: >Hi Andrew: > >Those new antialiased results that you showed for -dev png look great. > >Thanks for adding this capability to plfreetype.c Currently, only the >gd-related devices (png, jpeg, and gif) and wingcc take advantage of this >capability, but I am su

Re: [Plplot-devel] Fortran and Intel Fortran

2007-01-18 Thread Werner Smekal
Hi Jim, Jim Dishaw wrote: > Attached is a patch that gets plplot building correctly with the Intel > Fortran compiler. It still doesn't link correctly because of the > mismatch in runtime libraries. I'm not enough of a cmake guru to track > that down. Maybe some can read my previous message abou

Re: [Plplot-devel] cvs to svn conversion

2007-01-18 Thread Werner Smekal
Hi Alan, > Is this long "import" process the step that takes so long in the official > SourceForge process? They mention 24-hours or more to complete the task. Not really, I mean the svn import file is about 250Mb(!!) and it needs some time to import it, but will need maybe 15 minutes or so. Bu

Re: [Plplot-devel] The changes to freetype I made today

2007-01-18 Thread Alan W. Irwin
Hi Andrew: Those new antialiased results that you showed for -dev png look great. Thanks for adding this capability to plfreetype.c Currently, only the gd-related devices (png, jpeg, and gif) and wingcc take advantage of this capability, but I am sure others who have written device drivers that d