Re: POE not doing what I'm expecting it to......

2006-06-09 Thread Peter Farmer
Thanks to everyone who took the time to reply, I now have a much better understanding of how to write POE applications. Thanks, -- Peter Farmer

Re: POE not doing what I'm expecting it to......

2006-06-09 Thread Merijn Broeren
Quoting Peter Farmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Now, when I run the script, because of the $kernel-delay_set(scheduler,10) at the end of the sche sub, I'm expecting to see sche running at about 1149783936 or 1149783938 or as soon as possible after the 10 seconds have passed not 1149783946 once

Re: Improving performance in a POE application?

2006-06-09 Thread Apocalypse
Chris Fedde wrote: On Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:10:48 +0100 Nick Williams wrote: +-- | I never knew about POE::Devel::Profiler and I'm learning rapidly about | it now with my own visualizer. Most cool. However it highlights | something I've wanted for a while: names on sessions.

Re: Improving performance in a POE application?

2006-06-09 Thread Nicholas Perez
A little alias cleanup isn't that difficult to fathom. When you are through with the session just alias_remove(). I would go so far as to say that is pretty standard fair when making sure POE cleans up after itself. As for the performance bit, I was only able to get around 250 or so active TLS