On 2017-02-07 10:12, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi Istvan,
Noel Jones wrote:
> Remember that header_checks won't match encoded subjects
We need to see the raw Subject header from the email that failed to
match. It was probably encoded.
$ scan -forma '%{subject}' .
=?UTF-8?B?VGhpcyBpcyBzc
Hi Istvan,
> Noel Jones wrote:
> > Remember that header_checks won't match encoded subjects
We need to see the raw Subject header from the email that failed to
match. It was probably encoded.
$ scan -forma '%{subject}' .
=?UTF-8?B?VGhpcyBpcyBzcGFtLgo=?=
$ scan -forma '%(decode{subje
On 2017-02-06 23:19, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/6/2017 3:23 PM, Istvan Prosinger wrote:
Hi All, and Happy New Year with a little delay :)
Comming to spam, header checks are one tool that I use frequently to
prevent it.
So, amongst all, I have this:
if !/^Subject: (.*)[Aa]liexpress/
/^Subject:(.*)
On 2017-02-06 22:56, Dominic Raferd wrote:
On 6 February 2017 at 21:23, Istvan Prosinger
wrote:
Hi All, and Happy New Year with a little delay :)
Comming to spam, header checks are one tool that I use frequently to
prevent it.
So, amongst all, I have this:
if !/^Subject: (.*)[Aa]liexpress/
On 2/6/2017 3:23 PM, Istvan Prosinger wrote:
> Hi All, and Happy New Year with a little delay :)
>
> Comming to spam, header checks are one tool that I use frequently to
> prevent it.
>
> So, amongst all, I have this:
>
> if !/^Subject: (.*)[Aa]liexpress/
> /^Subject:(.*)% [Oo][Ff][Ff]/ REJECT G
On 6 February 2017 at 21:23, Istvan Prosinger wrote:
> Hi All, and Happy New Year with a little delay :)
>
> Comming to spam, header checks are one tool that I use frequently to
> prevent it.
>
> So, amongst all, I have this:
>
> if !/^Subject: (.*)[Aa]liexpress/
> /^Subject:(.*)% [Oo][Ff][Ff]/ R
Hi All, and Happy New Year with a little delay :)
Comming to spam, header checks are one tool that I use frequently to
prevent it.
So, amongst all, I have this:
if !/^Subject: (.*)[Aa]liexpress/
/^Subject:(.*)% [Oo][Ff][Ff]/ REJECT Go away spammer
endif
And this worked fine until _today_, wh