Hi John,
The fastest and safest way to do that is to hide ALL of the other tracks and
then put the tracks you want to record in to record.
You could also make a group out of those tracks and while in group dialogue
include the "record" as an attribute for that group and go for it?
Then when that
If a sighted person had 24 tracks and wanted to record on the first ten
tracks starting with input #6 going through to input #16 in order, they
would hit the command and option keys together while clicking the mouse on
the input field of the first track and start with #6. I can't figure out
how
You're partly correct. HD Native does use native processing but it still uses a
card for 0 latency routing. The interfaces still connect to a PCI card. Only
the plug-in processing is handled by the host CPU while routing is handled by
the card.
HTH,
Slau
On Apr 5, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Jon Solitr
That's how some cats were using Pro Tools back in the days before I solved the
metering problem. Insertion of limiter plug-in and recording to another track.
Again, there's latency but only a little. On HD systems, it's hardly detectable.
Slau
On Apr 5, 2013, at 3:29 PM, byron harden wrote:
>
I cannot wait to try this with my ProTools demo. Since I've had this board I
have had very little clipping at all. Doing this from my Board is very easy. It
has built in compression and reverb. I can track with reverb or compression and
not printed it
Ricky Prevatte LMBT 1154 http://www.rickypr
Ok, so I'm confused. What's the difference between HD and HD Native? I thought
Native meant it uses the computer's processors just like regular Pro Tools. And
the benefit to HD was the outboard processing cards.
On Apr 5, 2013, at 3:17 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> Tracking with compre
i never thought of tracking like that with plug in comp.
will try that today slau.
very interesting
On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> Tracking with compression, at least in plug-in form, would be helpful to
> control dynamics. Especially when working with more than
Hi Jon,
Tracking with compression, at least in plug-in form, would be helpful to
control dynamics. Especially when working with more than one vocalist, people
usually track each other much better when they hear a more even level of
signal. Sometimes we call that "railroad," that is, when people
hello john
i've recently got a hd system.
i generally work projects that have very high track counts, so i need a lot of
processing power, as well as a lot of voicings.
having access to the dsp thing is great for me.
i also feel it sounds better, that could just be wishful thinking. lol
Makes sense. This topic is slowly morphing….another question….how is tracking
with compression helpful? It's all after the fact if you're using a plugin
compressor right? the audio will still clip?
On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, "Poppa Bear" wrote:
> Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compressi
Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often help
inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of what a
mixed down product will feel like. Message -
From: Jon Solitro
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
Well, occasionally, you might want to track with certain reverbs or delays on
certain tracks. It can sometimes help inspire a performance. Also, for those
who track with amp simulation, it's a pretty big consideration. Again, I'm
sure that'll all change in the very near future.
Not sure about
Yeah thats what I was thinking. I have a quad core Mac pro which seems to
handle anything. What is the benefit of tracking with plug ins?
Can I mix in surround without HD?
Sent from my phone
On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
Hi Jon,
Aside from 0 latency, HD systems include all
Hi Jon,
Aside from 0 latency, HD systems include all of the extra options that the
expanded toolkits provide. These days, I'm not even sure what that includes. HD
Native systems also have 0 latency because of the routing the card provides.
That 0 latency is also possible on Apogee's Symphony ca
I don't have any latency issues right now….if I do I adjust the buffer size.
Would there be the same latency issues with HD Native?
On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:32 AM, CHUCK REICHEL
wrote:
> Hi Jon,
> For my self its one word!
> LATENCY :)
> YMMV
>
>
> CHUCK REICHEL
> soundpicturerecord...@gmail.c
Hi Jon,
For my self its one word!
LATENCY :)
YMMV
CHUCK REICHEL
soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com
www.SoundPictureRecording.com
954-742-0019
GUFFAWING :)
In GOD I Trust
On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Jon Solitro wrote:
> What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
>
>
What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googleg
17 matches
Mail list logo