PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Jon Solitro
What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googleg

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread CHUCK REICHEL
Hi Jon, For my self its one word! LATENCY :) YMMV CHUCK REICHEL soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com www.SoundPictureRecording.com 954-742-0019 GUFFAWING :) In GOD I Trust On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Jon Solitro wrote: > What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile? > >

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Jon Solitro
I don't have any latency issues right now….if I do I adjust the buffer size. Would there be the same latency issues with HD Native? On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:32 AM, CHUCK REICHEL wrote: > Hi Jon, > For my self its one word! > LATENCY :) > YMMV > > > CHUCK REICHEL > soundpicturerecord...@gmail.c

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Slau Halatyn
Hi Jon, Aside from 0 latency, HD systems include all of the extra options that the expanded toolkits provide. These days, I'm not even sure what that includes. HD Native systems also have 0 latency because of the routing the card provides. That 0 latency is also possible on Apogee's Symphony ca

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Jon Solitro
Yeah thats what I was thinking. I have a quad core Mac pro which seems to handle anything. What is the benefit of tracking with plug ins? Can I mix in surround without HD? Sent from my phone On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Slau Halatyn wrote: Hi Jon, Aside from 0 latency, HD systems include all

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Slau Halatyn
Well, occasionally, you might want to track with certain reverbs or delays on certain tracks. It can sometimes help inspire a performance. Also, for those who track with amp simulation, it's a pretty big consideration. Again, I'm sure that'll all change in the very near future. Not sure about

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Poppa Bear
Subject: PT vs PT HD What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from i

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Jon Solitro
f track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often help > inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of what a > mixed down product will feel like. Message - > From: Jon Solitro > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM > S

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread byron harden
; mixed down product will feel like. Message - >> From: Jon Solitro >> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM >> Subject: PT vs PT HD >> >> What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile? &g

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Slau Halatyn
compression. The reverb does often help >> inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of what a >> mixed down product will feel like. Message - >> From: Jon Solitro >> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:1

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread byron harden
b does often >>> help inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of >>> what a mixed down product will feel like. Message - >>> From: Jon Solitro >>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >>> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 A

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Jon Solitro
13, at 2:38 PM, "Poppa Bear" wrote: >> >>> Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often >>> help inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of >>> what a mixed down product will feel like. Message - &

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Ricky Prevatte
l feel like. Message - >> From: Jon Solitro >> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM >> Subject: PT vs PT HD >> >> What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile? >> >> -- >> You received th

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Slau Halatyn
; On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, "Poppa Bear" wrote: >>> >>>> Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often >>>> help inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of >>>> what a mixed down product w

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Slau Halatyn
you're using >>> a plugin compressor right? the audio will still clip? >>> >>> >>> On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, "Poppa Bear" wrote: >>> >>>> Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often >

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-06 Thread Byron Harden
is >>>> tracking with compression helpful? It's all after the fact if you're using >>>> a plugin compressor right? the audio will still clip? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, "Poppa Bear" wrot

Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-08 Thread Poppa Bear
Another difference is that HD is 192 KHZ, but some say that it doesn't make a difference when it comes to commercial music. - Original Message - From: Slau Halatyn To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 11:17 AM Subject: Re: PT vs PT HD H