Zack Goldstein added the comment:
I've started going through the demos. So far I've gone through cgi and classes.
If this is what you're looking for I'll try and go through the rest in the next
week or so.
Python 3.2a0
/cgi
all work
/classes
Complex.py - fai
Zack Goldstein added the comment:
I'm assuming tested means "run", and that a good demo is one that "works" for
some nominal input.
--
___
Python tracker
<http
New submission from Zack Weinberg:
subprocess.check_output calls Popen.communicate but does not allow you to
specify its argument (i.e. data to send to the child process's stdin). It
would be nice if it were enhanced to allow this. Proposed patch attached (to
the 2.7 subprocess.py; s
Zack Weinberg added the comment:
OK, here is a patch against the latest development version. Now also with
tests and documentation updates.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28247/issue16624-v34.diff
___
Python tracker
<h
Changes by Zack Weinberg :
Removed file:
http://bugs.python.org/file28218/subprocess-check-output-allow-input.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Zack Weinberg added the comment:
I don't have the ability to test on Windows, but the construct you are
concerned about was copied from other tests in the same file which were not
marked as Unix-only.
I have faxed in a contributor agre
Zack Weinberg added the comment:
Contributor agreement resent by email. Sorry for the delay.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16624>
___
___
Zack Weinberg added the comment:
Here is a new patch vs latest trunk.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29924/issue16624-v34a.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16
Changes by Zack Weinberg :
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file28247/issue16624-v34.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16624>
___
___
Python-bug
Zack Weinberg added the comment:
> I think that it will be better not introduce a new argument, but reuse stdin.
> Just allow io.BytesIO (or perhaps even any file object) be specified as stdin.
If we were designing from scratch I might agree, but we aren't. Principle of
least a
Zack Weinberg added the comment:
Note also that allowing `stdin=` in a clean fashion would require
rather more surgery than you suggest, because a filelike can produce an
infinite stream of data, and people would expect that to work when the
subprocess only reads a finite prefix; making it
Zack Weinberg added the comment:
My position is:
* input= should be supported in check_output(), for consistency with
communicate().
* I like the idea of making stdin= support file-like objects which don't have a
fileno, in both communicate() and everything that calls it, but that doe
Zack Weinberg added the comment:
??? communicate() has always had input= AFAIK.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue16624>
___
___
Python-bug
Zack Weinberg added the comment:
OK, I get that, but what I'm saying is I think input= is still desirable even
if stdin= becomes more powerful.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
14 matches
Mail list logo
