Re: Is email package thread safe? (fwd)

2005-02-12 Thread Roman Suzi
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Antoon Pardon wrote: Op 2005-02-09, Roman Suzi schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Antoon Pardon wrote: Op 2005-02-09, Roman Suzi schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Just to be sure, is email package of Python 2.3 thread-safe or not (to use, for example, in python-milter?)

Re: Is email package thread safe? (fwd)

2005-02-10 Thread Antoon Pardon
Op 2005-02-09, Roman Suzi schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Antoon Pardon wrote: Op 2005-02-09, Roman Suzi schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Just to be sure, is email package of Python 2.3 thread-safe or not (to use, for example, in python-milter?) Can I assume that everything else

Re: Is email package thread safe? (fwd)

2005-02-09 Thread Diez B. Roggisch
Usually, oo-style apis are thread-safe as long as each thread uses its own objects. Shared global state is _very_ uncommon, and if it's most probably documented. -- Regards, Diez B. Roggisch -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Is email package thread safe? (fwd)

2005-02-09 Thread Antoon Pardon
Op 2005-02-09, Roman Suzi schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]: (this is a repost with an addition - probably noone noticed my message first time) Hi! Just to be sure, is email package of Python 2.3 thread-safe or not (to use, for example, in python-milter?) P.S. And where can I find information

Re: Is email package thread safe? (fwd)

2005-02-09 Thread Roman Suzi
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Antoon Pardon wrote: Op 2005-02-09, Roman Suzi schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Just to be sure, is email package of Python 2.3 thread-safe or not (to use, for example, in python-milter?) Can I assume that everything else without such notice is thread-safe? I doubt it. There is no