On 09/19/2017 12:30 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 09/19/2017 01:13 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> [ Just saw this, so missed adding tags to the v2 patch set. ]
>>
>> On 09/14/2017 11:53 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> At least this msg disappeared:
>>>
>>> "Disassembler disagrees wi
On 09/19/2017 01:13 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
[ Just saw this, so missed adding tags to the v2 patch set. ]
On 09/14/2017 11:53 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
At least this msg disappeared:
"Disassembler disagrees with translator over instruction decoding"
It's back in v2.
For i386,
[ Just saw this, so missed adding tags to the v2 patch set. ]
On 09/14/2017 11:53 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> At least this msg disappeared:
>
> "Disassembler disagrees with translator over instruction decoding"
It's back in v2.
> For i386, arm, mips32/64:
> Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-
On 09/14/2017 03:35 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
As occasionally discussed on this list, due to licensing conflicts,
we are restricted to a version of libopcodes that pre-dates its
upstream re-licensing to gplv3. That makes our copy rather old
and dated.
I've already seen this as problematic fo
As occasionally discussed on this list, due to licensing conflicts,
we are restricted to a version of libopcodes that pre-dates its
upstream re-licensing to gplv3. That makes our copy rather old
and dated.
I've already seen this as problematic for s390x guest. I'm sure
the same problem exists fo
