Plugin QMarxan Toolbox approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1121] QMarxan Toolbox 0.1 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/QMarxanToolbox/
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://l
Very good idea..
+1 for that.. Going to take a look once I'm back home..
Regards
Werner
On 13 October 2016 00:22:22 Johan Van de Wauw
wrote:
Saga contains logic to translate the gui and modules, including german. See
the txt files here:
https://sourceforge.net/p/saga-gis/code/ci/master/tree
Hi Andreas,
Thanks a lot for your reply, the plugin helped a lot!
Let's keep in touch for this development,
Best wishes,
Denis
Le mer. 12 oct. 2016 à 15:40, Neumann, Andreas a
écrit :
> Hi Denis,
>
> It is in the "ExpressionsPlus" python plugin - for now.
>
> It was discussed if this could b
Hi,
here in ubuntu xenial, qgis compiled from source, I can't save annotations
in QGIS in project file.
Testing that I also triggered a crash if there is an html annotation with
no file provided.
Anyone reproduces that before I fill a bug report?
Cheers
Régis
--
Régis Haubourg
regis.haubo...@o
Hi Devs,
I'm writting this email to inform you about my last QGIS Server
improvements.
Firstly, when we fixed something in QgsMapLayerRegistry: [BUGFIX] Emit
layerWillBeRemoved like layersWillBeRemoved (#3194)
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/f6aad8bad6db72d0b1e573998ac7dcb2405dce55;
we
Saga contains logic to translate the gui and modules, including german. See
the txt files here:
https://sourceforge.net/p/saga-gis/code/ci/master/tree/saga-gis/src/saga_core/saga_gui/res/
Translation should not happen in QGIS but in SAGA. We could definitely look
at how the translated strings of S
Hi Denis,
It is in the "ExpressionsPlus" python plugin - for now.
It was discussed if this could become a core feature - see thread
starting at
https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2016-September/044855.html
See feature request: https://hub.qgis.org/issues/15618
Noone is assign
Hi all,
I remember reading something about an expression to know if a feature is
selected or not, but can't recall where.
Is this already in master?
Can this be used for specific symbology of features in map composer?
Thanks
Denis
___
Qgis-develope
Il 12/10/2016 14:20, René-Luc Dhont ha scritto:
> Hi devs,
>
> I have updated the QEP:
Thanks René. Should we wait until all the pieces are defined, or should
a crowdfunding start piece by piece? I think having a general picture
first would be good, but on the other hand starting with consolidate
Hi devs,
I have updated the QEP:
* the title made by David
* the list of qgis3.0_api issues
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/74
I have found 5 already opened qgis3.0_api issues link to QGIS server
enhancement.
* QgsProject is a singleton #8
* Map Layers and QgsMapLayer
Plugin GNSS 3D Capture approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1122] GNSS 3D Capture 0.1 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/GNSS3DCapture/
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://li
Hi guys,
with very small files (10 rows shape and 10 rows table) QGIS 2.16 crashes
randomly with both Windows (2.16.3) and Linux (2.16 compiled from source).
Someone else experienced the same problem?
Thanks
Cheers
Matteo
___
Qgis-developer mailing l
Hi
I agree with Andreas that there is no need to hurry. It is much easier
to plan once the Project / MapLayerRegistry redesign has been done.
The plans with server services as plugins are nice, and people can work
at it while the Project / MapLayerRegistry refactoring is going on. It
is howe
I think it needs a core dev familiar on the code base (specifically
server situation) to decide what needs to be done under the hood.
I propose to ask Marco Hugentobler to take a technical lead on this,
since he started QGIS server and should be familiar with the issues.
Other devs can of course
Ok for the renaming.
> Le 12 oct. 2016 à 10:04, Neumann, Andreas a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes - that seems a good place to do the discussions.
>
> Maybe the title of the QEP can be renamed to "QGIS server code refactoring
> for QGIS 3.0" - or something similar. And the original proposal about th
Naturally, I volonteer for help.
> Le 12 oct. 2016 à 10:07, Paolo Cavallini a écrit :
>
> Il 12/10/2016 09:56, David Marteau ha scritto:
>> Hi,
>>
>> There a QEP about the refactoring of the server that already addresses some
>> issues: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues
Il 12/10/2016 09:56, David Marteau ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> There a QEP about the refactoring of the server that already addresses some
> issues: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/74, could
> it fit as a starting point ?
Thanks everybody for comments. I agree we should star
Hi,
Yes - that seems a good place to do the discussions.
Maybe the title of the QEP can be renamed to "QGIS server code
refactoring for QGIS 3.0" - or something similar. And the original
proposal about the "Server Services as plugins" could be included?
Thanks and greetings,
Andreas
On 2016
Hi Patrick,
Matthias Kuhn, the one who knows about this the best, is currently out
of office / on holidays. I think he is back next week.
I would probably wait for his review.
Thanks and greetings,
Andreas
On 2016-10-12 09:48, Patrick Valsecchi wrote:
> No answer. I think I'll move forwa
Hi,
There a QEP about the refactoring of the server that already addresses some
issues: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/74, could it
fit as a starting point ?
> Le 12 oct. 2016 à 09:42, Paolo Cavallini a écrit :
>
> Il 12/10/2016 09:26, Neumann, Andreas ha scritto:
No answer. I think I'll move forward with my proposal.
Thanks.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Patrick Valsecchi <
patrick.valsec...@camptocamp.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm tasked with making QGIS a bit more usable with complex database
> schemas having a lot of relations (up to hundreds of linked
Il 12/10/2016 09:26, Neumann, Andreas ha scritto:
> Lets spend some time first, to collect all the requirements before we do
> any further actions. I think in this situation a QEP, describing what to
> do in what order, makes a lot of sense. After that we can look into who
> could do what.
Agreed
Hi Paolo / Tudor,
I agree that the QGIS server improvements should be started. But you
need a clear plan on what to do in what order. Requirements need to go
first, otherwise there is no point in selecting devs, getting
quotes/estimates and doing a crowd-funding. And probably, several devs
will b
Hi Paolo,
A big thumbs up!
All the best,Tudor
On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 8:28 AM, Paolo Cavallini
wrote:
Hi all,
after a first bloom of interest around the improvement/rewrite of qgis
server, things seem stagnant nowadays. I suggest therefore to:
* select one or more suitable devel
24 matches
Mail list logo
