Hello,
Le dimanche 16 décembre 2012 02:36:31, pcr...@pcreso.com a écrit :
> I'm interested in at least discussing this thread going a step further,
> with respect to a SpatialLite based file transfer tool for geodata.
>
> The OGC has mandated many open standards, including SFS, which most spatial
I'm interested in at least discussing this thread going a step further, with
respect to a SpatialLite based file transfer tool for geodata.
The OGC has mandated many open standards, including SFS, which most spatial
databases are predicated on.
It is not that clear to me whether a spec for an
Hi Stefan,
> Your point is very common and I understand this situation.
> But the ArcGIS SW suite doesn't really make interoperability easy and tends
> to maintain a vendor lock-in.
> My proposal is to break this deadlock by programming an free ArcGIS desktop
> extension which reads/writes Spatial
Hi agin
Surely I did not mean to drop Shapefile support ! We must let the user
choose. But now, as ESRI Shapefile is the simplest/default way (yet
limited) to create/edit layers, we "force" the users to use it, which I
dislike for reasons written previously.
I think sqlite could be a great alterna
For what it's worth... I'm in a ESRI+QGIS environment. I feel QGIS should
obvioulsy improve spatialite usage. It should be intuitive and easy to
create, save, export spatialite layers.
For ESRI I can always convert to shapefile, like I have to do when going
from ESRI to QGIS. Hopefully as SL's ado
r
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Get rid of Shapefiles ! Go SpatiaLite !
To: pcr...@pcreso.com
Cc: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Date: Wednesday, November 28, 2012, 3:28 AM
Hi Brent
Your point is very common and I understand this situation.But the ArcGIS SW
suite doesn't really make intero
ion, & QGIS needs to be viable for such
> use, & at least Arc compatible, if not Arc friendly. SpatiaLite, despite
> all it's advantages, is inappropriate here.
>
>
> Brent Wood
>
> --- On *Tue, 11/27/12, Noli Sicad * wrote:
>
>
> From: Noli Sicad
> Subje
e, & at
least Arc compatible, if not Arc friendly. SpatiaLite, despite all it's
advantages, is inappropriate here.
Brent Wood
--- On Tue, 11/27/12, Noli Sicad wrote:
From: Noli Sicad
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Get rid of Shapefiles ! Go SpatiaLite !
To: "haubourg"
Cc: qgis-de
Hi all,
One thing to add to our feature list is the ability to do the following :
* use the menu "Add a vector layer"
* choose a sqlite file
* a dialog with all tables contained in this file pops up and let the user
choose one
* load the layer (spatial or not) in QGIS
By the way, we in 3liz woul
Am 27.11.2012, 08:20 Uhr, schrieb Paolo Cavallini :
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:56:30 +0100, "Bernd Vogelgesang"
wrote:
You just should not use Qspatialite to import shapes. I nearly gave up
upon spatialite, when i figured out that i had to use the Spatialite GUI
instead and this was fast as he
Just a note on the difficulty of Spatialite rather then shapefiles.
I often work with commercial softwares, and most of thems let the user work
seamlessly with local geodatabases (many of them use the MDB format), and I
see it's not so strange for GIS users to use them rather then shapefiles to
org
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:56:30 +0100, "Bernd Vogelgesang"
wrote:
> You just should not use Qspatialite to import shapes. I nearly gave up
> upon spatialite, when i figured out that i had to use the Spatialite GUI
> instead and this was fast as hell.
Why not using DB Manager?
> So at the moment
Am 26.11.2012, 23:13 Uhr, schrieb Alister Hood
:
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:35:24 +
From: Barry Rowlingson
...
>
> I am very frustrated by the limitations of the Shapefile format, and
much
> more by the quasi obligation to use it as the default vector format
in QGIS.
> I mean for non
> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:35:24 +
> From: Barry Rowlingson
> ...
> >
> > I am very frustrated by the limitations of the Shapefile format, and much
> > more by the quasi obligation to use it as the default vector format in QGIS.
> > I mean for non power users who do not use PostGIS or spatial
I totally agree too.
Spatialite is growing rapidly. As you know it has also got the support for
Android right in these days.
I think a tighter integratio in QGis would easily find the financial
support for its development...
giovanni
2012/11/26 haubourg
> Hey +1 for me! I answered in the old po
Spatialite 4.0.0 was released yesterday. Sandro will update the
Spatialite QGIS data provider in the next few days to support
Spatialite 4.0.x.
Noli
On 11/27/12, haubourg wrote:
> Hey +1 for me! I answered in the old post on GeoJSON.
> You pointed exactly what's missing now !
>
>
>
>
> --
Hey +1 for me! I answered in the old post on GeoJSON.
You pointed exactly what's missing now !
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Re-Get-rid-of-Shapefiles-Go-SpatiaLite-tp5018830p5018893.html
Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabb
Hello all,
+1 for Spatialite
You can also have a look on Geopackages announcement at OGC e.g
http://www.opengeospatial.org/pressroom/pressreleases/1710
It seems to be a future standard for geospatial data
Regards
ThomasG
___
Qgis-developer mailing lis
Hi Michael
+1 from my part.
To me Spatialie is "the shapefile of the future" since 2010 (see e.g. FOSS4G)
Yours, Stefan
2012/11/26 Pēteris Brūns :
> Hi,
> +1
> This direction from my view is more correct course of action - make the use
> of spatialite more easy and ergonomic for users as it is
Hi,
+1
This direction from my view is more correct course of action - make the
use of spatialite more easy and ergonomic for users as it is now and in
case of success it will be used more and more.
Regards,
On 2012.11.26. 18:35, kimaidou wrote:
Hi again
I am coming back after more thinking
Hi again
I am coming back after more thinking :). I changed the subject into Go
Spatialite !
List of modifications which would help to use spatialite instead of
Shapefile as the default format :
* Create a new vector layer : should allow to choose between shapefile and
Spatialite. Let the use ch
21 matches
Mail list logo
