Il 12/10/2016 14:20, René-Luc Dhont ha scritto:
> Hi devs,
>
> I have updated the QEP:
Thanks René. Should we wait until all the pieces are defined, or should
a crowdfunding start piece by piece? I think having a general picture
first would be good, but on the other hand starting with
Hi devs,
I have updated the QEP:
* the title made by David
* the list of qgis3.0_api issues
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/74
I have found 5 already opened qgis3.0_api issues link to QGIS server
enhancement.
* QgsProject is a singleton #8
* Map Layers and
Hi
I agree with Andreas that there is no need to hurry. It is much easier
to plan once the Project / MapLayerRegistry redesign has been done.
The plans with server services as plugins are nice, and people can work
at it while the Project / MapLayerRegistry refactoring is going on. It
is
I think it needs a core dev familiar on the code base (specifically
server situation) to decide what needs to be done under the hood.
I propose to ask Marco Hugentobler to take a technical lead on this,
since he started QGIS server and should be familiar with the issues.
Other devs can of course
Ok for the renaming.
> Le 12 oct. 2016 à 10:04, Neumann, Andreas a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes - that seems a good place to do the discussions.
>
> Maybe the title of the QEP can be renamed to "QGIS server code refactoring
> for QGIS 3.0" - or something similar. And the
Naturally, I volonteer for help.
> Le 12 oct. 2016 à 10:07, Paolo Cavallini a écrit :
>
> Il 12/10/2016 09:56, David Marteau ha scritto:
>> Hi,
>>
>> There a QEP about the refactoring of the server that already addresses some
>> issues:
Il 12/10/2016 09:56, David Marteau ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> There a QEP about the refactoring of the server that already addresses some
> issues: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/74, could
> it fit as a starting point ?
Thanks everybody for comments. I agree we should
Hi,
There a QEP about the refactoring of the server that already addresses some
issues: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/74, could it
fit as a starting point ?
> Le 12 oct. 2016 à 09:42, Paolo Cavallini a écrit :
>
> Il 12/10/2016 09:26,
Il 12/10/2016 09:26, Neumann, Andreas ha scritto:
> Lets spend some time first, to collect all the requirements before we do
> any further actions. I think in this situation a QEP, describing what to
> do in what order, makes a lot of sense. After that we can look into who
> could do what.
Hi Paolo / Tudor,
I agree that the QGIS server improvements should be started. But you
need a clear plan on what to do in what order. Requirements need to go
first, otherwise there is no point in selecting devs, getting
quotes/estimates and doing a crowd-funding. And probably, several devs
will
Hi Paolo,
A big thumbs up!
All the best,Tudor
On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 8:28 AM, Paolo Cavallini
wrote:
Hi all,
after a first bloom of interest around the improvement/rewrite of qgis
server, things seem stagnant nowadays. I suggest therefore to:
* select
Hi all,
after a first bloom of interest around the improvement/rewrite of qgis
server, things seem stagnant nowadays. I suggest therefore to:
* select one or more suitable developers
* obtain an estimate
* start a crowdfunding.
Given the number of interested firms and individuals, I think it
12 matches
Mail list logo