Bill Waugh wrote:
Erm... I use Mozilla these days. It strips off the '>' marks...
... and replaces them with neat, continuous vertical bars.
I wonder. I can't be bothered to check, but does LookOut offer a
similar
function - replace '>' with neat, continous nothin
Note: In I/E 6: There does not *seem* to be the offer of the -
'>' etc as a prefix but a standardisation on ':'
Sorry Bill, my mistake. The selection *is* offered via
'plain text settings'
John in Wales
Re Tony's:
Bill is still pretty unsure as to what is happening.
I am pretty sure he must be sending it without indents (>) but I don't
think he is convinced.
I cannot see how _any_ mailer can strip off '>' - it just doesn't seem
logical.
=
In I/E v 6.00
- Original Message -
From: "Laurence Reeves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Parcelfarce
>
> Tony Firshman wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 at 09:23:47, Norman Dunbar wrote:
> > (ref:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> >
>
Tony Firshman wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 at 09:23:47, Norman Dunbar wrote:
> (ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
>
>>Sorry guys, I may have led you up the garden path.
>>
>>When I mentioned 'quotes' I was referring to 'quoting of previous text to
>>which I am now replying' - basically, what has bee
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 at 09:23:47, Norman Dunbar wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
>Sorry guys, I may have led you up the garden path.
>
>When I mentioned 'quotes' I was referring to 'quoting of previous text to
>which I am now replying' - basically, what has been said before. I was not
>referr
There seems to be a lot of discussion on how e-mailers are formatting
the messages. Have you considered that your e-mail readers may be
presenting the e-mail as you have instructed them. If you are sending
and receiving plain text the receiver should receive plain text, unless
the email rea
Sorry guys, I may have led you up the garden path.
When I mentioned 'quotes' I was referring to 'quoting of previous text to
which I am now replying' - basically, what has been said before. I was not
referring to quote marks (" or ') in Bill's text - as far as I know, these
are fine.
When Bill
