On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 02:06:52PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> qmail-send won't
> dispatch messages to qmail-local or qmail-remote while there are
> messages in queue/todo.
I've been thinking about this issue, and was wondering if it would be
possible to fix this in some simple way. Would it be p
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 02:13:47PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
>I've been thinking about this issue, and was wondering if it would be
>possible to fix this in some simple way. Would it be possible to modify
If one has big-todo, is there any point in spending so much time
working the todo? Switc
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:50:36AM -0700, Sean Reifschneider wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 02:13:47PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
> >I've been thinking about this issue, and was wondering if it would be
> >possible to fix this in some simple way. Would it be possible to modify
>
> If one has
h each qmail instance giving me a low concurrency,
I am achieving high concurrency by running 5 instances of qmail
- Original Message -
From: Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: qmail-send
Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:50:36AM -0700, Sean Reifschneider wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 02:13:47PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
> > >I've been thinking about this issue, and was wondering if it would be
> > >possible to fix this in some simple w
David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > With or without big-todo, you risk ending up with a f*cking big todo
> > queue after that. Switching off todo-handling for a while,
> > automatically, sounds like a *very* bad idea to me.
>
> Why is a
