Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:50:36AM -0700, Sean Reifschneider wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 02:13:47PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
> > >I've been thinking about this issue, and was wondering if it would be
> > >possible to fix this in some simple way. Would it be possible to modify
> >
> > If one has big-todo, is there any point in spending so much time
> > working the todo? Switching the priority so that todo isn't processed
> > until the loop runs without starting any qmail-remotes (meaning
> > we're either at concurrency, or we have no more messages to deal with).
>
> With or without big-todo, you risk ending up with a f*cking big todo
> queue after that. Switching off todo-handling for a while,
> automatically, sounds like a *very* bad idea to me.
Why is a fscking big todo queue any worse than a fscking big queue?
The current system of favoring todo processing over sending out mail
seems to rather bite.
--
David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon/
Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/
