Thank you Ben! I will give it a try.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://g
ob/master/plot-lib/plot/private/plot3d/surface.rkt#L28
>
>
> (I guess there should be 2 loops, one to draw the surface and one to
> draw the lines)
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Marduk Bolaños > wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Recently, I made a
Dear all,
Recently, I made a 3D plot with surface3d, but had to increase the
number of samples from the default value in order to obtain a
smooth surface. Unfortunately, this change also increased the
number of mesh lines, which resulted in a very dark surface. The
appearance improved by painting
Great! Thanks a lot!
Still, I would like to know why this is not the default behaviour of plot.
Cheers,
Marduk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Dear all,
I did a scatter plot with a logarithmic Y-axis. It looks fine but there
is something that really bugs me: there are no minor ticks between the
X-axis and the first major tick.
Here is the code:
#lang racket
(require plot)
(parameterize ([plot-y-transform log-transform]
Great! Thank you!
Best,
Marduk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups
Dear Neil,
Thank you very much for your thoughtful reply and your understanding.
> There are lots of ways to "interoperate" between languages, but once
> you get into high-level languages the C calling-convention native code
> way you might be thinking of doesn't necessarily work well.
I am real
Dear Matthias,
Thank you for your thoughtful response.
> we are not used to the words "profit" and "maximize profit" on this
> mailing list.
Most people are used to linking profit with money but it has a much
broader meaning.
> Sadly, I think that this is neither technically easy nor socially
>
> When you say "maximize the profit," whose profit are you referring to?
What I mean is that software that could be useful in several contexts,
like a plotting library, should enable the possibility of pluging it in
to a larger software project. That way, several projects would
benefit/profit from
Dear all,
As everybody knows, Racket's plot library is feature-rich and produces
beautiful output. The draw library is also great for generating
diagrams. I prefer functional-style drawing over LaTeX packages.
What I would like to do is to be able to use these libraries in
Maxima, Julia and other
10 matches
Mail list logo
