On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Chris Parrish
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I saw somewhere that Luis Lavena was researching porting rDiscount to
> Windows but also that it didn't look good (discount depends on some *nix
> only libraries, I think)
>
> Hopefully I'm wrong, though.
>
> Either way, I
I saw somewhere that Luis Lavena was researching porting rDiscount to
Windows but also that it didn't look good (discount depends on some *nix
only libraries, I think)
Hopefully I'm wrong, though.
Either way, I didn't mean to hijack a thread. New Redcloth for all!
-Chris
john muhl wrote:
On 2008/07/24, at 07:44, Sean Cribbs wrote:
How would people feel about switching to a gem dependency on the
latest RedCloth (instead of packaging it)?
I think it's going to have to happen at some point unless Radiant
wants to keep using the same old text parsing libraries from
2004/2005.
That was my main concern... I'd like to continue packaging the library
with Radiant, but it is no longer pure-Ruby and must be compiled. That
said, RubyGems has greatly improved since we started down this road.
Sean
Jim Gay wrote:
It's a bit of a detour from Radiant being geared toward share
I understood discoount to be *nix only (no Windows). I'll have to look
into it further.
-Chris
Jim Gay wrote:
It's a bit of a detour from Radiant being geared toward shared hosting.
John Muhl is working on a branch than uses RDiscount (which is a
better Markdown parser).
http://github.com/
It's a bit of a detour from Radiant being geared toward shared hosting.
John Muhl is working on a branch than uses RDiscount (which is a
better Markdown parser).
http://github.com/johnmuhl/radiant/tree/markdown
On Jul 24, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Chris Parrish wrote:
I'm fine with it. Looks like
Someone was working on a branch that uses rdiscount, an improved
Markdown parser.
Sean
Chris Parrish wrote:
I'm fine with it. Looks like a good improvement too.
Now all we need is a better Markdown parser.
-Chris
Sean Cribbs wrote:
How would people feel about switching to a gem dependency
I'm fine with it. Looks like a good improvement too.
Now all we need is a better Markdown parser.
-Chris
Sean Cribbs wrote:
How would people feel about switching to a gem dependency on the
latest RedCloth (instead of packaging it)?
Sean
Ollivier Robert wrote:
Have you seen this announceme
How would people feel about switching to a gem dependency on the latest
RedCloth (instead of packaging it)?
Sean
Ollivier Robert wrote:
Have you seen this announcement?
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RubyInside/~3/342732232/redcloth-4-released-962.html
Apart from dropping of Markdown support
Have you seen this announcement?
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RubyInside/~3/342732232/redcloth-4-released-962.html
Apart from dropping of Markdown support (does radiant use it?), it
could be interesting to update it.
--
Ollivier Robert -
___
Radiant
10 matches
Mail list logo
