pulls only. (Until that lovely error that produced the canti-Rom.)
-Jim W.
-Original Message- From: Forrest Sent: Nov 10, 2011 9:07 AM To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [RBW] Long-low for sale in SF Craigslist RBW did indeed build several canti LongLows. You can see at le
My '98 canti LongLow (Joe/Joe):
http://diesel.smugmug.com/Shiny-Things/Rivendell-LongLow/
- Andrew, Berkeley
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Forrest wrote:
> RBW did indeed build several canti LongLows. You can see at least one on
> cyclofiend's Current Classics site. -- Forrest (Iowa City)
RBW did indeed build several canti LongLows. You can see at least one on
cyclofiend's Current Classics site. -- Forrest (Iowa City)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.go
The LongLow on Flickr that cyclotourist refers to is mine. -- fm
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/veYr46fCEgUJ.
To post to this grou
Get some full-sized pix from the seller. Find out if it's a Waterford or
Joe/Joe build. Then at that point, go see it in person if you're in the
Bay Area. If it's Joe/Joe, it's pretty well priced. W'ford, not so much
so.
FYI, here's a tantalizing lead recently dropped on flickr:
http://www.fli
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Joe Bernard wrote:
> It is not an Atlantis, and I see no reason to consider this a scam.
> Considering all the variations we've seen in Rivendell models over the
> years, I have no reason to doubt that Grant/Waterford put together a
> canti-LongLow. If you think i
It is not an Atlantis, and I see no reason to consider this a scam.
Considering all the variations we've seen in Rivendell models over the
years, I have no reason to doubt that Grant/Waterford put together a
canti-LongLow. If you think it's overpriced, make an offer. Treating it as
BS seems unf
HI Thomas. How about visiting RIv (I'm assuming you're local given the SF
Craigslist link) and checking out a new Sam Hillborne ($1050 frame/fork)?
It would make for a great all-purpose bike and is quality, comfortable
steel. And, with the extra $300 you save on the frame/fork, you can pick
some us
The production frames of the time went for $1100 up to $1400 by 1996, IIRC. A
cream head tube was an extra $100 option and was later standard.
On Nov 10, 2011, at 1:40 AM, Thomas B wrote:
> The price seems a bit high to me seeing as the complete bike retailed
> at ~$2450, back in the late 90's
I wanted to get some advice on a recent posting for a +10 year old
Long Low advertised on Bay area Craigslist. I've read some of the
older comments on this discussion group and it seems like a frameset
that has been offered and discussed before several times, albeit at
higher prices.
Please check
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Phil Brown wrote:
> There is a Long Low prototype for sale here in the Bay Area. The owner
> may post it later but for now contact me. It's 60 by 59 I believe,
> green and white and if it had a bit longer top tube I'd buy it in a
> heartbeat. The price is $1550 and
There is a Long Low prototype for sale here in the Bay Area. The owner
may post it later but for now contact me. It's 60 by 59 I believe,
green and white and if it had a bit longer top tube I'd buy it in a
heartbeat. The price is $1550 and I can put you in touch with the
seller.
Phil Brown
--
You
12 matches
Mail list logo