Rob, before you get too worked up about this, I got it
too... from the email address I used when I setup my
up2date and RHN registration, which is NOT the same as
this address, or any other address I've subscribed to
any Redhat or Linux information on. So, whoever sent
it had to have gotten the i
Red Hat has been using this company for quite some time in the mailout of
their 'Under the Brim' newsletter which you can subscribe on their front
page.
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> if this is in fact legit, i'm more than a little stunned. who at
> red hat decided to provide
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:56:28 -0500 (EST), Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> before anyone gets too cranked up about this, it is almost
> certainly bogus. look at the return email address --
> redhat.chtah.com.
>
> a quick browse of www.chtah.com shows a
Dammit, I just got 8 working the way I want. :o)
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
Red Hat list admin:
A number of folks received the following on the Red Hat mailing
list recently. The overwhelming evidence is that it is spam,
given the return address of redhat.chtah.com
Ummm nope. Unless this spammer happened to also take over the
redhat.com domain
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:23:58PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> at this point, it's not the existence of red hat 9 that's the issue --
> it's the offer for RHN subscription that appears to be going back to
> an obvious spammer -- that is, chtah.com.
There's a very clear distinction between "an
I'm just trying to figure out why they'd announce a jump from RH8.0
direct to 9.0 that'll be available the day before April Fool's day. This
kind of thing would make a great April Fool's joke, but judging by the
web site, they're serious about it. No obvious domain hijacking going on
either:
[
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
can someone clarify this? i mean, it makes no sense for red hat
to be sending out offers like this from the chtah.com domain,
does it?
All previous announcements have been done through this domain as well,
including their RHCE specific surveys, etc. Unless they're reall
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> Rober! This is *NOT* spam.
>
> http://www.redhat.com/mktg/rh9iso/
>
> And the email I got FROM RH has my username and info in it. It is most
> certainly from RedHat, and it most certainly is v9.0.
if this is in fact legit, i'm more than a little stun
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Jody Cleveland wrote:
> > before anyone gets too cranked up about this, it is almost
> > certainly bogus. look at the return email address --
> > redhat.chtah.com.
> >
> > a quick browse of www.chtah.com shows an obvious
> > spammer. so this is total nonsense.
>
> I al
Look at www.redhat.com there is a reference to RHL 9 over there.
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 15:11, Jody Cleveland wrote:
> > before anyone gets too cranked up about this, it is almost
> > certainly bogus. look at the return email address --
> > redhat.chtah.com.
> >
> > a quick browse of www.ch
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 12:56, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> before anyone gets too cranked up about this, it is almost
> certainly bogus. look at the return email address --
> redhat.chtah.com.
>
> a quick browse of www.chtah.com shows an obvious
> spammer. so this is total nonsense.
Actually, g
> A number of folks received the following on the Red Hat mailing
> list recently. The overwhelming evidence is that it is spam,
> given the return address of redhat.chtah.com.
This is from the marketing company redhat has been using for several of it's
most recent emails.I also recieved an
But would http://www.redhat.com/mktg/rh9iso/ resolve?
-eric
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> before anyone gets too cranked up about this, it is almost
> certainly bogus. look at the return email address --
> redhat.chtah.com.
>
> a quick browse of www.chtah.com shows an obvious
> spammer. so this
Dude, if you follow the links, it points back to redhat. I'm guessing
they used a third-party provider to handle the traffic this message
would cause.
-dd
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/24/03 12:00PM >>>
Red Hat list admin:
A number of folks received the following on the Red Hat mailing
list recent
Rober! This is *NOT* spam.
http://www.redhat.com/mktg/rh9iso/
And the email I got FROM RH has my username and info in it. It is most
certainly from RedHat, and it most certainly is v9.0.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert P. J.
I thought so too, but it's mentioned on the Redhat web site.
Mike
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 11:56, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> before anyone gets too cranked up about this, it is almost
> certainly bogus. look at the return email address --
> redhat.chtah.com.
>
> a quick browse of www.chtah
> before anyone gets too cranked up about this, it is almost
> certainly bogus. look at the return email address --
> redhat.chtah.com.
>
> a quick browse of www.chtah.com shows an obvious
> spammer. so this is total nonsense.
I also belong to Redhat Network. They sent a message about this
18 matches
Mail list logo
