Sorry, but because I just recently began following this line of discussion
would someone kindly inform me as to the meaning of the subject line which
has "George Washington adding 'under God' to the Presidential oath." Or,
is it merely a bit of humor? And, I hope my gra
The answer to your first
question is perfectly obvious.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005
12:50 PM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: George Washington
adding "under God" to the Preside
Arthur V. Watkins, a Republican, was an honorable man. Consequently, the censure of Joseph McCarthy was not done in error. Had his information been "impeccable," he would not have been censured.
The Party of Joseph McCarthy may, if it chooses, call the Democratic Party "the Democrat Party" in
Scarberry, Mark wrote:
Thus the Democratic Party seems to want special
treatment, claiming the right to have its members known as Democrats rather
than Democratics. :-)
That's 'cause we're special*. *Noddle*
Jean
*For an unspecified value of "special"
___
Academics
Sent: 7/20/2005 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: George Washington adding "under God" to the Presidential oath
And to the Libertars and Socials as well.
On 7/20/05, Rick Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't understand what all this food-fighting is about. I am a pro
What about the Pale Mint folk?
Samuel V wrote:
And to the Libertars and Socials as well.
On 7/20/05, Rick Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't understand what all this food-fighting is about. I am a proud member
of the Republic Party and I am not offended when others call it the Repub
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I will call the Democrat Party the Democrat Party. Some of you
may dislike it.
If I had my voter registration card with me here, I could see just what
it says I am. Since I don't, I'll have to go on memory alone. I'm
pretty sure I'm a registered member of the
And to the Libertars and Socials as well.
On 7/20/05, Rick Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't understand what all this food-fighting is about. I am a proud member
> of the Republic Party and I am not offended when others call it the Republic
> Party!
>
> Cheers and Blessings to Democrat
I don't understand what all this food-fighting is about. I am a proud member of the Republic Party and I am not offended when others call it the Republic Party!
Cheers and Blessings to Democrat and Republic listmembers alike, Rick Duncan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/20/2005 11
In a message dated 7/20/2005 11:35:01 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would help if you would
respect the norms.
Please. An end to this nonsense.
I will call the Democrat Party the Democrat Party. Some of you may
dislike it. You, in turn, will call me juven
: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: George Washington
adding "under God" to the Presidential oath
In a
message dated 7/20/2005 10:22:07 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I never
associated Democrat Party with McCarthy, although I'm not all that sur
In a message dated 7/20/2005 9:15:43 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about capitalization? How about punctuation?
I will call the Democrat Party the Democrat
Party.
You can, of course,
call the Democratic Party anything you wish. However, the
ex
inal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 1:55 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: George Washington adding "under God" to the Presidential
oath
It comes from the concept of Shu
il: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 1:55 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: George Washington adding "under God" to
In a message dated 7/20/2005 10:22:07 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I never
associated Democrat Party with McCarthy, although I'm not all that surprised
to learn that he originated it. I always associated it with middle
school. It is intended to be somehow in
7/20/2005 8:14 AM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: George Washington adding "under God" to the Presidential oath
How about capitalization? How about punctuation?
I will call the Democrat Party the Democrat Party. Truth is, I only pretend to
be saluting McCarthy, whose inf
Okay, Sandy, you got me.
His information, on the grand scale, was impeccable. We were
infiltrated, and the process was deliberate, targeted, and ongoing.
Whether he played lawyer's tricks with rosaries tucked into hankies, or Ross
Perot tricks with empty boxes allegedly full of documents,
have in my hand a list of [I forget the exact number] of communists"), for
starters?
sandy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wed 7/20/2005 8:14 AMTo:
religionlaw@lists.ucla.eduSubject: Re: George Washington adding
"under God" to the Presidential oa
How about capitalization? How about punctuation?
I will call the Democrat Party the Democrat Party. Truth is, I only
pretend to be saluting McCarthy, whose information turned out to be impeccable
even if his personality and ethic did not. My pretense was offered
because, in pointing out
Does grammar have a role to
play in the controversy between Marty and Jim? If so, it seems Marty wins.
"Democratic" is, of course, an adjective; "Democrat" is a noun. If not, why
not?
Bobby
Robert Justin
LipkinProfessor of LawWidener University School of
LawDelaware
___
In a message dated 7/19/2005 4:35:13 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jim: The proper adjective is "Democratic," as in "Democratic
Party." (But then, you probably already knew that.) Sorry for the
lecture, but this is a hobbyhorse of mine: The lockstep use of
Read the original charter at Harvard. Closely! It is a dead give a way!
I am slow coming to this thread. I did some research on oaths in
connection with the mysterious disappearance of "so help me God" in testimonial
oaths administered during the Democrat interregnum on the Senate Judiciary
Jim: The proper adjective is "Democratic," as in "Democratic Party." (But
then, you probably already knew that.) Sorry for the lecture, but this is a
hobbyhorse of mine: The lockstep use of "Democrat" as an adjective is not only
juvenile, and grating on the ears, it's also quite literally Mc
I am slow coming to this thread. I did some research on oaths in
connection with the mysterious disappearance of "so help me God" in testimonial
oaths administered during the Democrat interregnum on the Senate Judiciary
Committee, after Jim Jeffords left the Republican Caucus. With Pat Leah
-
From: Jean Dudley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 1:21 pm
Subject: Re: George Washington adding "under God" to the Presidential oath
> Volokh, Eugene wrote:
>
> > I've heard various people mention that George Washington added
> >&
Volokh, Eugene wrote:
I've heard various people mention that George Washington added
"so help me God" to the constitutionally prescribed, which is "I do
solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of
President of the United States, and will to the best of my Abil
I've heard various people mention that George Washington added
"so help me God" to the constitutionally prescribed, which is "I do
solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of
President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability,
preserve, protect an
27 matches
Mail list logo