[Repeater-Builder] Re: FCC considers Auxiliary Operation on 2M!

2004-04-26 Thread wd8chl
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim B. wrote: > > >Doesn't matter-in fact a repeater that's tied up all day with chatter > >isn't available for emergency communications. Plus the more time it > >spends keyed up, the less time till something fails.

[Repeater-Builder] Re: FCC considers Auxiliary Operation on 2M!

2004-04-20 Thread Coy Hilton
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Q" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jim B. wrote: > > > > > > Doesn't matter-in fact a repeater that's tied up all day with chatter > > > isn't available for emergency communications. Plus the more time it > > > spends keyed up, the less time till something

[Repeater-Builder] Re: FCC considers Auxiliary Operation on 2M!

2004-04-20 Thread Coy Hilton
I must make a comment here...people that think that repeaters should be there and not used is asking for the band to be removed by the FCC, that will fix all of your peoblemsThen you can keep all of the repeaters for EMERGENCIESExcept for one thing there will be no one there to help you