One of the best ways to find ANYthing is to check google.com -- I
searched for 'M2" and found this:
http://www.m2wins.com/main/index.shtml
- ilyes
--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:
mplete
backward compatibility). This explains why you can find so many DLT drives
on eBay.
Steve
Cybernetics
www.cybernetics.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of David Ross
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 11:22 AM
To: retro-talk
Subject: Re: Purchasi
>Not really. AIT and DAT and I assume M2 spin the heads and slow down the
>tape but the relative speeds are in the same neighborhood. (I assume
>it's easier to spin the heads faster than move the tape faster which is
>why DLT appears to be falling behind in the race.) Anyway, you still
>need to ke
This explains why you can find so many DLT drives
on eBay.
Steve
Cybernetics
www.cybernetics.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of David Ross
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 11:22 AM
To: retro-talk
Subject: Re: Purchasing a new system
> DLT
> DLT has not addressed that issue. Since linear pulls the tape across the
> heads at a faster rate (150 inches per second vs helical scan's .5"/second),
> it requires streaming -- otherwise you end up "shoe-shining". This
> reposition is very intense on the heads/tape of a linear drive.
>
> Th
01 3:59 PM
To: retro-talk
Subject: Re: Purchasing a new system
Yet another thought about backups.
Currently we have a dedicated NT server with 280 GB of cheap IDE drives
inside. Multiple times, in a day, it duplicates the changes from critical
servers (two remotely). The changes are usually no
Yet another thought about backups.
Currently we have a dedicated NT server with 280 GB of cheap IDE drives
inside. Multiple times, in a day, it duplicates the changes from critical
servers (two remotely). The changes are usually no more than 300 MB per
execution.
The duplication serves several p
Adam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Pam Lefkowitz
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 2:45 PM
To: retro-talk
Subject: Re: Purchasing a new system
>My boss is really leery of Ecrix, no matter how much I push it. She's
>worr
>My boss is really leery of Ecrix, no matter how much I push it. She's
>worried that, should something happen to the company in two years or
>so (since they're the only one doing this kind of tape/drive now), we
>won't have the $$ in our budget to purchase a whole new system. I
>keep working o
...in that case, go with Sony's AIT-2. The company is certainly in no danger
and they also have a road map to higher capacity and performance.
Both VXA and AIT use evaporated metal media rather than particulate
media making head life and drive reliability a plus.
Avoid cold/condensing environment
>I've noticed that Ecrix is coming out with
>larger tape libraries, Does anyone think that will make it a more viable
>solution or is AIT still the way to go?
Hi Tim,
Ecrix has tape libraries (they call them autopacks) already in service.
And VXA-2 is right around the corner. AIT is a great sol
An Ecrix rep told me that they are coming out with VXA-2 later this
year, which should up capacity and make VXA even better. I just can't
decide if I should go with VXA now, or if I should wait for VXA-2.
Jim
At 12:56 PM -0500 on 1/24/01, you wrote:
>I can't speak for everyone but I hope you k
>I can't speak for everyone but I hope you keep this discussion on the list. If
>it does happen to go off-line, I would greatly appreciate a copy of the final
>thoughts.
I agree. IMHO the biggest problem with tape drives is not the purchase cost or the
tape costs, but the sheer level of grief ca
I'm not planning on taking the discussion offlist, though I've had a
few responses offlist, and those have recommended Ecrix or AIT, so
those are the leading contenders.
My boss is really leery of Ecrix, no matter how much I push it. She's
worried that, should something happen to the company i
I can't speak for everyone but I hope you keep this discussion on the list. If
it does happen to go off-line, I would greatly appreciate a copy of the final
thoughts.
There was a thread that went around a couple of months ago with price
comparisons for all of these different media types (including
Julia
>Currently, we are using one DDS-3 tape drive for our entire local base of about 70
>users
>I am also interested in doing a remote backup of our NYC office. They have static
>IPs, and could possibly be added to our backup sets.
>So, should I keep the same tape system (DDS-3) and get
I would have to say AIT. Sony pulled the plug on the proposed DDS-5 so I
wouldn't suggest that line at all (end of product life). Also, DAT drives
have 1/5th the head life expectancy (10,000 hours instead of AIT's 50,000
hours).
DLT would definitely be better than DAT but is faced with the same
Julia,
I can't speak for the other tape formats but I have always used DLT as it
seems to be the "Industry Standard". I would recommend taking a look at the
HP series of Autoloaders. I use an HP SureStore 818 which holds up to (8)
40GB Tapes (80GB compressed) so I can store up to 640GB on a set
18 matches
Mail list logo
