Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12736#issuecomment-215342650
**[Test build #57227 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57227/consoleFull)**
for PR 12736 at commit
[`4920360`](https://g
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#discussion_r61387931
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
---
@@ -336,4 +336,62 @@ public UnsafeArrayData copy() {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#discussion_r61387937
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
---
@@ -336,4 +336,62 @@ public UnsafeArrayData copy() {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#discussion_r61386974
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
---
@@ -336,4 +336,62 @@ public UnsafeArrayData copy() {
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#discussion_r61386945
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
---
@@ -336,4 +336,62 @@ public UnsafeArrayData copy() {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215340310
**[Test build #57234 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57234/consoleFull)**
for PR 12746 at commit
[`e61aa8a`](https://gi
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215340073
retest this please?? Why did you run all the unit tests??
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215339652
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215339654
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215339565
**[Test build #57231 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57231/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
[`2378829`](https://g
Github user kiszk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215338341
@cloud-fan , @mengxr, it would be worth to add ```final``` to a declaration
of ```UnsafeArrayData ``` for encouraging method inlining by JIT compiler, as
follows:
```
Github user BenFradet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12467#discussion_r61384769
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/RFormulaSuite.scala ---
@@ -290,4 +291,18 @@ class RFormulaSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
MLl
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12560#discussion_r61384326
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/Instrumentation.scala ---
@@ -85,6 +85,13 @@ private[ml] class Instrumentation[E <: Estimator[_]]
pri
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601#issuecomment-215335519
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12736#discussion_r61383924
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/HiveTypeCoercionSuite.scala
---
@@ -488,14 +488,6 @@ class HiveTypeCoercionSu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601#issuecomment-215335518
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601#issuecomment-215335486
**[Test build #57229 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57229/consoleFull)**
for PR 11601 at commit
[`4e1c34a`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12724#issuecomment-215335070
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12724#issuecomment-215335073
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12724#issuecomment-215334962
**[Test build #57221 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57221/consoleFull)**
for PR 12724 at commit
[`49b7b52`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12604#issuecomment-215334819
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12604#issuecomment-215334571
**[Test build #57228 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57228/consoleFull)**
for PR 12604 at commit
[`cdab34a`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12604#issuecomment-215334815
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12612
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215334370
**[Test build #57233 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57233/consoleFull)**
for PR 12746 at commit
[`e61aa8a`](https://gi
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12720#issuecomment-215334359
@hvanhovell That make sense, I will take another deep look tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#discussion_r61383378
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
---
@@ -336,4 +336,62 @@ public UnsafeArrayData copy()
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12612#issuecomment-215334099
Merging in master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12720#discussion_r61383358
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/namedExpressions.scala
---
@@ -337,6 +337,16 @@ case class PrettyAttribute(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12612#issuecomment-215332700
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215333558
**[Test build #57232 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57232/consoleFull)**
for PR 12746 at commit
[`c4e48dc`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215333563
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215333565
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215332276
e.g., in `BisectingKMeans`, this patch changes
val data = dataset.select(col($(featuresCol))).rdd.map { case
Row(point: Vector) => point }
to
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215333433
**[Test build #57232 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57232/consoleFull)**
for PR 12746 at commit
[`c4e48dc`](https://gi
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12720#discussion_r61382939
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/namedExpressions.scala
---
@@ -337,6 +337,16 @@ case class PrettyAttribut
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12604#issuecomment-215332574
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12604#issuecomment-215332573
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12612#issuecomment-215332701
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12612#issuecomment-215332517
**[Test build #57220 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57220/consoleFull)**
for PR 12612 at commit
[`124568b`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12604#issuecomment-215332479
**[Test build #57226 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57226/consoleFull)**
for PR 12604 at commit
[`ba664f9`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215332412
**[Test build #57231 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57231/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
[`2378829`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215331169
**[Test build #57230 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57230/consoleFull)**
for PR 12640 at commit
[`f4d2cbb`](https://gi
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12720#issuecomment-215330406
This is an example that will fail if we pull out predicates in the
optimizer (`min(b.value)` does not resolve):
```sql
select b.key, min(b.value)
from src
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601#issuecomment-215330151
**[Test build #57229 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57229/consoleFull)**
for PR 11601 at commit
[`4e1c34a`](https://gi
Github user hhbyyh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11601#issuecomment-215330198
Documents updated and remove an unit test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215329786
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215329787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215329754
**[Test build #57225 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57225/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
[`b2101b2`](https://g
Github user suyanNone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12655#issuecomment-215329471
as I know, duplicate stage occurs:
stage 2 and stage 3 all depends on stage 1
stage 4 depends on stage 2 and stage 3
So, if we get getAncestorShuffl
801 - 850 of 850 matches
Mail list logo
