Hi,
In article ,
JJZolx wrote:
> Just use COMMENT. Yes, if you use programs that map names, you'll have
> to be careful. Use a 'hex editor'
> (http://www.searchandreplace.com/fshexedit.htm) to actually look at the
> field names being written to the file. Luckily, the vorbis comments are
This is interesting. I'm upgrading my home server and was planning to
re-rip everything into Apple Lossless as iTunes is bearable for me.
However I stream to multiple players (boom, SBR, Radio) and at least two
are synced at any one time. Without knowing anything about native
formats etc would FLA
The sound quality of Apple Lossless and FLAC will be the same, so the
choice depends a lot on which "ecosystem" is more important for your
purposes. If you are heavily invested in SBs, then FLAC is the way to go
because Squeezeboxes play FLAC natively. If support for Apple products
is important to
After you edited the tags did you do a full clear and rescan? It can be
needed where artist 'structure' is changed.
elstensoftware's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=31345
View this thread: http://fo
If they are synced it is only one transcoding process as the server
sends the same stream to both players
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/
Mnyb wrote:
> If they are synced it is only one transcoding process as the server
> sends the same stream to both players
Correct, yet still some low-end server hardware is not up to performing
that task reliably.
aubuti's
aubuti wrote:
> Correct, yet still some low-end server hardware is not up to performing
> that task reliably.
yep I would consider 1core x86 some thing >1,2 gHz rock bottom .
But the most demanding transcoders in my experience is the ones for
lossy formats like lame ? so a good server is also o
Mnyb wrote:
> yep I would consider 1core x86 some thing >1,2 gHz rock bottom .
>
> But the most demanding transcoders in my experience is the ones for
> lossy formats like lame ? so a good server is also of interest if you
> want some of the more obscure web radio channels on old players
Am I
Fozzy wrote:
> Am I right in thinking MP3 is one of those formats that requires
> significantly more CPU power to encode than to decode? If so you could
> always avoid transcoding into it.
Yes that what i do :)
but LMS has a bitrate limiter that uses LAME mp3 , it uses more cpu than
SoX utilit