On Jan 21, 2008 2:12 PM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to write a story for a Rails app which involves using the
> attachment_fu plugin to upload images.
>
> After blunting my pick on this for a while, google found me this:
> http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/134743#600831
>
>
Hello RSpec'ers :-)
In reply to this message:
http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/2008-January/005477.html
I provided a patch against CURRENT for fixing the latest issue
introduced in 1.1.2 regarding colour and Windows.
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645/tickets/244-no-coloured
On Jan 21, 2008 6:53 PM, BenFyvie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am using Rspec 1.1.2 on Windows XP SP2
>
> I am receiving the following error when I run 'rake spec' from a brand new
> project:
> C:/SVN_Projects/rspec/vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec/runner/options.rb:107:in
> `colour=': You must ge
I am using Rspec 1.1.2 on Windows XP SP2
I am receiving the following error when I run 'rake spec' from a brand new
project:
C:/SVN_Projects/rspec/vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec/runner/options.rb:107:in
`colour=': You must gem install win32console to use colour on Windows
(RuntimeError)
I have th
I'm trying to write a story for a Rails app which involves using the
attachment_fu plugin to upload images.
After blunting my pick on this for a while, google found me this:
http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/134743#600831
So it seems that there's a hole in Rails integration testing and
multipart fo
On Jan 21, 2008 8:22 AM, Jim Lindley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm 99 44/100% sure that you have it right. The expression x != y is
> > syntactic sugar for !(x == y) much like x += y is syntactic sugar for
> > x = (x +y)
> >
> > The parser turns these into an internal representation (abstract
> I'm 99 44/100% sure that you have it right. The expression x != y is
> syntactic sugar for !(x == y) much like x += y is syntactic sugar for
> x = (x +y)
>
> The parser turns these into an internal representation (abstract
> syntax tree for 1.8, byte-codes for 1.9) which is identical to the
> se
Hi,
I am facing a problem while trying to test a method that updates an
attribute. The attribute format should be converted to YAML format
before storing in the table which is excatly what is going on. But when
testing it using expectations in rspec it returns an error.
*** below is the error mes
Oh, it's escaping the characters in the YAML format... sorry for that
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
