tation, and (b) does this sort of hack really result in a
> cleaner design than having some simple language extensions? Mind you,
> I'm all about ways to simplify Rust, but sometimes the simplest
> solution is to build stuff into the language.
>
> On March 11, 201
On Tue, 2014-03-11 at 14:18 -0700, Patrick Walton wrote:
> On 3/11/14 2:15 PM, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
> > Could you elaborate on DOM? I saw it referred a few times but I haven't
> > seen any details. I wrote simple bindings to libxml2 dom
> > (https://github.com/uzytk
On Tue, 2014-03-11 at 13:44 -0700, Patrick Walton wrote:
> On 3/11/14 1:42 PM, Daniel Micay wrote:
> > Existing object systems like COM, DOM and gobject are worth looking at,
> > but Rust shouldn't bend over backwards to support them. They're legacy
> > technologies and while interacting with them
;t require the object to store the state necessary
> to implement it? I mean, anything else is really just a function,
> instead of 60.days_after(date) use days_after(60, date).
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Maciej Piechotka
> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-03-11 at
dding BI as PO is 'open' for trait
implementation)
The user needs to do:
- Nothing. Everything works out of the box
And before you ask - component A and B were 2 different libraries for
which the Oracle interfaces were insufficient.
Best regards
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:35
On Tue, 2014-03-11 at 19:09 +, Bill Myers wrote:
> I see a proposal to add "virtual struct" and "virtual fn" in the workweek
> meeting notes, which appears to add an exact copy of Java's OO system to Rust.
>
> I think however that this should be carefully considered, and preferably not
> add
On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 23:54 -0300, Fernando Pelliccioni wrote:
>
> We still have the problem of dangling references.
>
>
> Any decent compiler can deal with this problem, and according to the
> Standard the implementations are encouraged to issue a warning in such
> a case.
> I don't know impleme
On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 22:48 +0100, Philippe Delrieu wrote:
> Thank for you reply. But I don't see any solution to my problem.. I'll
> explain it a little more.
>
> I want to develop a sort of GUI. The GUI has its own logic and use a
> rendering engine to do the work. I want my GUI separate of the
On Sat, 2014-02-08 at 17:23 -0800, Sean McArthur wrote:
> let in = readln!() ?
>
> macro_rules! readln(
> () => ({
> let mut stdin
> = ::std::io::BufferedReader::new(::std::io::stdin());
> stdin.read_line().unwrap()
> })
> )
>
Unless I read the source incorrectly that won't work if t
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 16:35 -0800, Brian Anderson wrote:
> Hey.
>
> One of my goals for 0.10 is to make the Rust installation and upgrade
> experience better. My personal ambitions are to make Rust installable
> with a single shell command, distribute binaries, not source, and to
> have both ni
Lee Braiden writes:
>
> On 14/01/14 23:49, Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
> > I disagree! rustpkg should handle dependencies for building a rust
> > package. It can automatically know which packages are needed from
> > "extern mod" etc. apt-get and others are just unsuited for this.
> >
>
> But that i
11 matches
Mail list logo
