On 4/1/11 6:18 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:22:18PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
On 3/31/11 5:59 PM, Daniel Bump wrote:
It seems that your patch has a problem to be applied to the current sage
4.6.2.
The patch was tested with 4.7.alphas (because we ho
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 03:18:04PM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> I'll push that in a couple minutes.
Done. I used the occasion to polish a tiny bit the corresponding
doctests. Please check, and if you are happy, fold and upload on trac.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicol
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:22:18PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> On 3/31/11 5:59 PM, Daniel Bump wrote:
> >
> >>It seems that your patch has a problem to be applied to the current sage
> >>4.6.2.
> >
> >The patch was tested with 4.7.alphas (because we hope for it to be merged
> >soon)
On 3/31/11 5:59 PM, Daniel Bump wrote:
It seems that your patch has a problem to be applied to the current sage
4.6.2.
The patch was tested with 4.7.alphas (because we hope for it to be merged
soon). The syntax of classical_crystals.py at the top of the file
has changed since 4.6.2. So it doe
> It seems that your patch has a problem to be applied to the current sage
> 4.6.2.
The patch was tested with 4.7.alphas (because we hope for it to be merged
soon). The syntax of classical_crystals.py at the top of the file
has changed since 4.6.2. So it doesn't merge.
One possibility would be t