On 01/30/11 03:27 PM, Jonathan wrote:
As one of the "non-mathematicians" (as a physical chemist who teaches
quantum mechanics and kinetics = nonlinear differential equations and
systems of differential equations, I'm not sure that is quite the
right term, but I think you get the idea), I thought
Upon a closer look at the symmetrica spkg I noticed a lot of other oddities.
Particularly ironic is the fact that the binary that fails to link on your
machine is actually not used. I've updated my spkg
(http://www.stp.dias.ie/~vbraun/Sage/spkg/symmetrica-2.0.p6.spkg), can you
give it another t
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 1/31/11 5:49 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
>
>>
>> I think the first step is making it so one can easily edit the
>> notebook if they built Sage from source. The test notebook would
>> automatically be launched. Once you've launched the noteboo
Hi Volker
On Feb 1, 2:27 am, Volker Braun wrote:
> I've made a trac ticket
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10719
>
> and an updated spkg:
>
> http://www.stp.dias.ie/~vbraun/Sage/spkg/symmetrica-2.0.p6.spkg
Thanks again. I tested your spkg. It doesn't work. You also need to
change m
On Feb 1, 2:27 am, Volker Braun wrote:
> Are you still using gcc 4.4.1? I'm actually surprised that you were able to
> compile the rest of Sage with that compiler.
>
> I've made a trac ticket
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10719
>
> and an updated spkg:
>
> http://www.stp.dias.ie/
>> I think a cool thing would be a forum for users, where they can
>> present their work with sage and also interact and work together on a
>> project. ...
> Why don't you research open source web apps that
> could provide something like that?
preliminary:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/emi
> > My suggestions for improvements would be:
> > Consolidate the forum. It is the main communication platform of the
> > project (together with the trac system). It might be a good idea to
> > reduce to maybe 3 google groups (Devel, Support, Users). One thing
> > that bogs me is that in the curre
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 02:49:03AM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> +1 I might not consolidate to 2 lists, but the -algebra one at least
> is very low traffic and often highly relevant to sage-devel (and
> anything not mentioned here is probably even lower).
If I recall correctly, every message to
Are you still using gcc 4.4.1? I'm actually surprised that you were able to
compile the rest of Sage with that compiler.
I've made a trac ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10719
and an updated spkg:
http://www.stp.dias.ie/~vbraun/Sage/spkg/symmetrica-2.0.p6.spkg
Volker
--
To
Hi all,
I'm trying to compile Sage 4.6.1 on openSUSE 11.2 x86_64 and have encountered
the same bug I reported on May 16 last year with Sage 4.4.1.
http://www.mail-archive.com/sage-devel@googlegroups.com/msg38879.html
Th fix is to move "-lm" to the right place on the command line. See diff
below.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 1/31/11 6:31 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Jason Grout
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/31/11 5:49 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
>>>
I think the first step is making it so one can easily edit the
noteb
On 1/31/11 6:31 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
On 1/31/11 5:49 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
I think the first step is making it so one can easily edit the
notebook if they built Sage from source. The test notebook would
automatically be launched
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 1/31/11 5:49 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
>
>>
>> I think the first step is making it so one can easily edit the
>> notebook if they built Sage from source. The test notebook would
>> automatically be launched. Once you've launched the noteboo
On 1/29/11 9:52 AM, rjf wrote:
Even assuming that the junk-submitter takes no time at all from
project management on the "front end", the need to review
"contributions"
is certainly a drain. Realizing, and then explaining to some loser
why his code is junk takes time.
Ironically, reading much
On 1/31/11 5:49 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
I think the first step is making it so one can easily edit the
notebook if they built Sage from source. The test notebook would
automatically be launched. Once you've launched the notebook you
shouldn't have to touch the command line.
That's an inte
On 1/30/11 4:42 PM, Jonathan wrote:
Ivan,
I am aware that you've been working on this. However, I have not had
any time to look at it. If things go well with my classes and
administrative responsibilities in the next couple of weeks I may get
a chance. I am very glad you have worked on this.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:18 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Timothy Clemans
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Simon King wrote:
>>> On 31 Jan., 07:13, William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Emil Widmann
wrote:
> But.
>
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Timothy Clemans
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Simon King wrote:
>> On 31 Jan., 07:13, William Stein wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Emil Widmann
>>> wrote:
>>> > But.
>>> > I strongly resent the comments and "spirit" of Prof. Fateman. Us
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Simon King wrote:
> On 31 Jan., 07:13, William Stein wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Emil Widmann wrote:
>> > But.
>> > I strongly resent the comments and "spirit" of Prof. Fateman. Using
>> > classifications like "losers" and "winners", "top producers
On 31 Jan., 07:13, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Emil Widmann wrote:
> > But.
> > I strongly resent the comments and "spirit" of Prof. Fateman. Using
> > classifications like "losers" and "winners", "top producers" and "junk
> > submitters" he introduces very elitist ter
20 matches
Mail list logo
