>
> I've created #24914.
>
IMO, would be better to have individual tickets for each file/issue as they
are independent. If you decide to do that, you can either keep #24914 as a
meta-ticket or recycle it as one of the tickets for one of the specific
issues.
> I will get around to it by
> No problem. And this was a mistake *I* made. This is a side-effect I
> did not consider and might want to think more about how to prevent...
GitHub forbids using an ssh key twice. It seems the only reasonable thing to do.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 7:29 PM, Meghana.M Reddy wrote:
> This was the mistake I made. It worked now. Thanks a lot for helping me out.
No problem. And this was a mistake *I* made. This is a side-effect I
did not consider and might want to think more about how to
Dear Erik,
I'm able to push my branch now. Thank you for your quick reply and helping
me with the SSH key.
Regards,
Meghana
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 9:35:01 PM UTC+5:30, Erik Bray wrote:
>
> Hi Meghana,
>
> I've manually deleted your duplicate SSH key, so you should be able to
> push
This was the mistake I made. It worked now. Thanks a lot for helping me out.
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 9:01:56 PM UTC+5:30, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Le mardi 6 mars 2018 13:17:56 UTC+1, Meghana.M Reddy a écrit :
>>
>> ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> t/24909/boruvka_algorithm_for_mst
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> Very good. Doesn't it only work if the user not only has the library but
> also the respective headers, i.e., the corresponding xyz-devel package
> installed?
Depends on the package, but if one package is a build dependency
Very good. Doesn't it only work if the user not only has the library but
also the respective headers, i.e., the corresponding xyz-devel package
installed?
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 4:54:12 PM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Dima Pasechnik >
Hi Meghana,
I've manually deleted your duplicate SSH key, so you should be able to
push again for now.
Best,
E
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Erik Bray wrote:
> There's also an issue that if you've made both a local account on the
> Trac server, and you have logged in
On 2018-03-06 14:42, Vít Tuček wrote:
I tried install dot2tex in Sage 8.1
How? Which command did you run?
and got error building mpfr.
Which error did you get exactly?
See https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
There's also an issue that if you've made both a local account on the
Trac server, and you have logged in with GitHub (i.e. your
gh- username), and if you've saved the same SSH key with
both accounts, then the push authorization scripts can fail.
This is because "" and "gh-" are treated as
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 9:48:25 AM UTC, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>>
>> I'm interested in a fix because it prevents clean patchbot results on
>> OpenSuSE
>
>
> Erik has an implementation of such feature generically, on
Le mardi 6 mars 2018 16:31:56 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
>
>
> The target on trac does not seem correct; the syntax of the push command
> should be
>
> git push trac HEAD:u/user_name/branch_name
>
>
>
For more details, see
Hi,
Le mardi 6 mars 2018 13:17:56 UTC+1, Meghana.M Reddy a écrit :
>
> ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> t/24909/boruvka_algorithm_for_mst (hook
> declined)
> error: failed to push some refs to 'g...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.git'
>
>
The target on trac does not seem correct; the syntax of the push
Dne pátek 2. března 2018 0:08:46 UTC+1 Travis Scrimshaw napsal(a):
>
>
>
>>>
Free abelian monoid... Hmmm... What free abelian monoid?
sage: PBW.basis().keys().an_element()
PBW[alpha[1]]^2*PBW[alphacheck[1]]^2*PBW[-alpha[1]]^3
So PBW.basis() is _indexed_
Hi!
I tried install dot2tex in Sage 8.1 and got error building mpfr. See the
attached log. At first it actually failed with complaints about mpfr being
too old (version 3.8 or something) so I did
./sage --package update mpfr 4.0.1 --url
Hi,
I am new to sage and fairly new to git too. I am working on implementing an
algorithm in Sage and I followed all the doc pages for setting up git trac.
I have created a new ticket for the algorithm I implemented and would like
to push my local branch to this ticket.
The git trac push
On 2018-03-06 00:29, Samuel Lelièvre wrote:
I opened a ticket to make JupyterLab a standard package:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24904
Any opinions?
Shouldn't it be an optional package first?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel"
Thank you all for your answers!
The conclusion is pretty clear: the differential operators will *not* be
added to the global namespace at start, even less be added silently when a
pseudo-Riemannian manifold is constructed. The only way to get them will be
an explicit demand from the user, in
18 matches
Mail list logo