On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 11:50 AM Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 7:33:51 PM UTC+9 Martin R wrote:
> In which repository?
>
> Here: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues
>
> Does this mean that researchers cannot become reviewers immediately
> anymore?
>
> You first become a
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 7:33:51 PM UTC+9 Martin R wrote:
In which repository?
Here: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues
Does this mean that researchers cannot become reviewers immediately anymore?
You first become a member of sage organization, and then be promoted to
Triage team (
On Friday, 10 February 2023 at 11:44:53 UTC+1 David Roe wrote:
I think the interface only allows reviewers for PRs, and not for issues
(though you could always make a comment on an issue declaring your
intention to review any resulting PR).
For PRs, you have a couple options:
1. At the top rig
Permission-wise, I think the only required permissions to review are Read
permissions, so I don't think it should be technically restricted.
David
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 11:33 AM 'Martin R' via sage-devel <
sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> In which repository?
>
> Does this mean that resear
I think the interface only allows reviewers for PRs, and not for issues
(though you could always make a comment on an issue declaring your
intention to review any resulting PR).
For PRs, you have a couple options:
1. At the top right of the PR, there's a "Reviewers" box, with a gear icon
next to i
In which repository?
Does this mean that researchers cannot become reviewers immediately anymore?
I am very puzzled.
Martin
On Friday, 10 February 2023 at 11:18:18 UTC+1 Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> I suggest this procedure:
>
> You open an issue: "promote me to a reviewer". Then if you get enough
> h
I suggest this procedure:
You open an issue: "promote me to a reviewer". Then if you get enough
hearts from other reviewers, an admin promotes you.
On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 7:07:04 PM UTC+9 Martin R wrote:
I was unable to find out how I declare myself as reviewer in the new
workflow.
T
I was unable to find out how I declare myself as reviewer in the new
workflow.
This question applies to
* pull requests without issue (I'm not sure yet how they work: given a
number like #35053, how can I see issue and pull request associated to it?
* issues without pull requests.
Martin
--
