On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Jesse Hersch wrote:
> On Thursday, May 8, 2014 4:14:32 PM UTC-7, William wrote:
>>
>> I could be wrong, but I don't think the implementation of Baum-Welch
>> is wrong. The BM algorithm [1] using double precision numbers (which
>> is all the HMM algorithm in Sage us
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 4:14:32 PM UTC-7, William wrote:
>
> I could be wrong, but I don't think the implementation of Baum-Welch
> is wrong. The BM algorithm [1] using double precision numbers (which
> is all the HMM algorithm in Sage uses) can lead to overflow, given the
> sort of computatio
Hi kcrisman and sage community!
I've just reported this issue at
https://github.com/sagemath/sagecell/issues/444
Best regards,
-- Share_The_Sage!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receivi
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Jesse Hersch wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I think I may have found a bug in the class hmm.DiscreteHiddenMarkovModel.
> The repro is below. It probably has something to do with one emission value
> being much more common than the others, but that shouldn't be invalid from
Hi there,
I think I may have found a bug in the class hmm.DiscreteHiddenMarkovModel.
The repro is below. It probably has something to do with one emission
value being much more common than the others, but that shouldn't be invalid
from my understanding of HMMs.
I am running Sage Version 6.2
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 12:01:23 PM UTC-4, William wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Pedro Cruz
> >
> wrote:
> > Is possible that after user action on interaction control X the function
> > that updates
> > the "interact screen" could also update the X control possible values ?
>
Is possible that after user action on interaction control X the function
that updates
the "interact screen" could also update the X control possible values ?
Thank you,
Pedro
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe fro
Hi Martin,
danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung. So wie es scheint basiert der Test auf
DDF, was vermutlich langsamer ist im Vergleich zu Rabins Test wenn grad(f)
= p = prim. Im allgemeinen Fall aber die schnellere Variante.
Danke nochmal,
viele Grüße
Am Mittwoch, 7. Mai 2014 15:35:45 UTC+2 s
