Great! thank you!
On Aug 21, 11:50 am, Mike Hansen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Oscar Lazo
> wrote:
> > implicit_multiplication is very time-saving, and a much more natural way to
> > write things. I'd love it to be default.
>
> In your "~/.sage/init.sage" file, add the line
> "imp
Hi Oscar,
Could you tell us a little more about what fails when you try
ask.sagemath.org? Do you get any error message? At least one tag is
required for every question, so did you include a tag?
thanks,
Niles
On Aug 21, 12:31 pm, Oscar Lazo wrote:
> implicit_multiplication is very time-saving
I have posted a new question now. My impression is that the problem
was related to my GoogleID authentification, since I was working with
two ID's at the time.
On Aug 21, 1:21 pm, Niles wrote:
> Hi Oscar,
>
> Could you tell us a little more about what fails when you try
> ask.sagemath.org? Do yo
I have now found out about the automatic_names option, that makes
variables be automatically declared.
Unfortunately this is not available in the command line, so editing
~/.sage/init.sage will not work. Can this too be set as a default?
thanks
Oscar
On Aug 21, 5:56 pm, Oscar Lazo wrote:
> I h
Hi Robin,
On 23 Aug., 12:58, robin hankin wrote:
> But, if I didn't know it existed, how could I possibly have found it?
> (give me a pointer to a FAQ!)
I just tried to find it in the FAQ, but without success.
Anyway. If you know that it is called implicit_multiplication then
you can do
sage
Hi Robin,
On 23 Aug., 13:43, robin hankin wrote:
> Re automatic_names(): why isn't this the default?
>
> Now I know it exists, I think I'll probably use it all the time.
>
> Who uses sage without this option?
I find automatic_names horrible, to say the least! In my opinion, such
thing should *ne
Hi Robert,
On 23 Aug., 18:08, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> > ... And on the other hand, I can't see how life with Sage would be
> > any easier if automatic_names was the standard.
>
> Think about someone working through a series of calculus textbook
> exercises (mostly one-liners).
I didn't deny tha
On Aug 23, 8:54 am, Simon King wrote:
> 1. If you write a little program on the command line and it does
> something, but simply it doesn't do the right thing or you get strange
> error messages about missing attributes -- it would be very hard to
> find out that you forgot to define some objec
On 8/24/10 11:45 AM, Oscar Lazo wrote:
On Aug 23, 8:54 am, Simon King wrote:
1. If you write a little program on the command line and it does
something, but simply it doesn't do the right thing or you get strange
error messages about missing attributes -- it would be very hard to
find out th
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Oscar Lazo wrote:
> Unfortunately this is not available in the command line, so editing
> ~/.sage/init.sage will not work. Can this too be set as a default?
You can add the following to your init.sage:
from sagenb.misc.support import automatic_names
automatic_nam
Hello everybody
>> > implicit_multiplication is very time-saving, and a much more natural way
>> > to write things. I'd love it to be default.
Wow, implicit_multiplication(True) is *exactly* what I have been looking for.
I have tried it just now, and it is brill.
OK, my question: Now that I k
Hello
thanks for this. I liked the preparser manpage that Simon pointed me to.
Re automatic_names(): why isn't this the default?
Now I know it exists, I think I'll probably use it all the time.
Who uses sage without this option?
Or, more precisely, can anyone give me an example of a way
of wo
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Robin,
>
> On 23 Aug., 13:43, robin hankin wrote:
>> Re automatic_names(): why isn't this the default?
>>
>> Now I know it exists, I think I'll probably use it all the time.
>>
>> Who uses sage without this option?
>
> I find automatic_names
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Simon King wrote:
>> Hi Robin,
>>
>> On 23 Aug., 13:43, robin hankin wrote:
>>> Re automatic_names(): why isn't this the default?
>>>
>>> Now I know it exists, I think I'll probably use it all the time.
>>
14 matches
Mail list logo
