Hi all!
I've seen a number of posts regarding Samba performance - either
comments about perceived poor performance, or recommended parameter
changes. Instead of some arbitrary buffer numbers, or "play with it
until it works", are there any analysis tools that can give quantitative
answers ?
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 18:16 +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Monday 17 September 2007 20:44:23 Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > Stupid question but is it possible to make SWAT use the smbpasswd file
> > to authenticate users instead of the system passwd file?
>
> Hey guys.
>
> I'd just like to know
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 10:06 -0400, Mike Davis wrote:
> After upgrading to 3.0.26a and moving to linux my member
> server gets hundreds of IPC$ connections when I run
> smbstatus. I also see in my logs the following...
>
> [2007/10/01 10:01:15, 0]
> lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_int
the winbindd.log you posted contains winbind startup messages?
if not try to restart winbind and check winbind log for errors .
/etc/nsswitch.conf contains winbind related strings?
On 10/8/07, Eric Diven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not actually getting much from it. I'm assuming that all of
Okay, I've just tried this on my working solaris setup, and I definitely
get stuff in the log file when I run getent passwd. Is there an
nsswitch log that would tell me if nsswitch is even trying to call the
winbind libraries?
~Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EM
Hi everybody,
I have some Problems with my Samba Server.
My Log is full of these messages:
Oct 8 19:01:12 smbd[6170]: getpeername failed. Error
was Der Socket ist nicht verbunden
Oct 8 19:01:12 smbd[27824]: getpeername failed.
Error was Der Socket ist nicht verbunden
Oct 8 19:01:12
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> I got samba 3.0.26a on my Fedora 7, and when i try to add users with
>> smbpasswd -a username, it only works if the user exists as a linux
>> user... i got a Centos 4.4 system with samba 3.0.10 and it works even
>> if the
I'm not actually getting much from it. I'm assuming that all of
winbinds logging goes to [logpath]/winbindd.log.
If that's the case, I'm seeing nsswitch related stuff happening when
winbind starts up, but not when I run getent passwd.
I'm running winbind at debug level 3.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# c
On 10/8/07, Mike Eggleston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007, James Lamanna might have said:
>
> > On 10/8/07, Mike Eggleston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 08 Oct 2007, James Lamanna might have said:
> > >
> > > > So as it turns out, apparently it was a window scaling issu
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007, James Lamanna might have said:
> On 10/8/07, Mike Eggleston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 08 Oct 2007, James Lamanna might have said:
> >
> > > So as it turns out, apparently it was a window scaling issue.
> > > Turning on an excessively large window size on the route
On 10/8/07, Mike Eggleston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007, James Lamanna might have said:
>
> > So as it turns out, apparently it was a window scaling issue.
> > Turning on an excessively large window size on the routers (thereby
> > enabling dynamic TCP window scaling) seems to h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Eggleston wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007, James Lamanna might have said:
>
>> So as it turns out, apparently it was a window scaling issue.
>> Turning on an excessively large window size on the routers (thereby
>> enabling dynamic TCP window scalin
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007, James Lamanna might have said:
> So as it turns out, apparently it was a window scaling issue.
> Turning on an excessively large window size on the routers (thereby
> enabling dynamic TCP window scaling) seems to have fixed the issue. I
> now get transfer rates around 130-160k
On 10/8/07, James Lamanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/8/07, James Lamanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/8/07, James Lamanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 10/7/07, James Lamanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 10/7/07, James Lamanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > On 1
I have read about the net commands and the possible use of robocopy for
migrating shares and files (with ACL preservation) from Windows to Samba.
I have also read about many users who have posted various errors with both
methods (error 5, access_denied, etc). However, I have been unable to find
a
On 10/8/07, James Lamanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/8/07, James Lamanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/7/07, James Lamanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 10/7/07, James Lamanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 10/7/07, Volker Lendecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > On
On 10/8/07, James Lamanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/7/07, James Lamanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/7/07, James Lamanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 10/7/07, Volker Lendecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 09:31:23AM -0700, James Lamanna wrote:
>
winbind's log may be helpful
On 10/8/07, Eric Diven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a samba install on Linux with winbind installed, etc. I've
> configured it the same as I have under Solaris, but for some reason, I
> can't chown a file to an AD username. I have joined the box to the
> d
Samba version is 3.0.24, running on CentOS 4.3, sorry about that.
~Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Eric Diven
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 12:35 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Can't chown a file to an ADS username
I
I've got a samba install on Linux with winbind installed, etc. I've
configured it the same as I have under Solaris, but for some reason, I
can't chown a file to an AD username. I have joined the box to the
domain, I can wbinfo -u/-g and get lists of users and groups on the
domain. When I run get
Terminal server already configured with "EnableMultiUser=1" , but all
sessions from Terminal server appears under same PID :
file-srv:~ # net status sessions
PID Username Group Machine
---
8742 DOMAIN\user1 DOMAIN
> Ok, lets put this better, maybe i confused some stuff...
> I got my ldap server on the centos machine, lots of users configured
> there, and works fine on the samba of that machine.
> Then i got Fedora 7 machine, with Samba configured to authenticate from
> the centos machine LDAP.
> When i try t
On 10/7/07, James Lamanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/7/07, James Lamanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/7/07, Volker Lendecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 09:31:23AM -0700, James Lamanna wrote:
> > >
> > > > Server sends 1500 byte packet
> > > > Client send
Ok, lets put this better, maybe i confused some stuff...
I got my ldap server on the centos machine, lots of users configured
there, and works fine on the samba of that machine.
Then i got Fedora 7 machine, with Samba configured to authenticate from
the centos machine LDAP.
When i try to connect
> I got samba 3.0.26a on my Fedora 7, and when i try to add users with
> smbpasswd -a username, it only works if the user exists as a linux
> user... i got a Centos 4.4 system with samba 3.0.10 and it works even
> if the user doesn't exists on the system.
> Can anyone explain me why this happens?
Depends upon your terminal server. NT4 and W2000 - yes. W2003 - no
(unless they added the EnableMultipleUsers parameter from W2000). I
wrote a kind of wordy paper about this:
http://www.docs.hp.com/en/5015/Samba-TerminalServer_104Final.pdf. This
paper version does not include the W2000 fix,
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007, simo might have said:
> On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 15:45 +0100, Ricardo Manuel Esteves (VI) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I got samba 3.0.26a on my Fedora 7, and when i try to add users with
> > smbpasswd -a username, it only works if the user exists as a linux
> > user... i got a Centos
Hi,
I got samba 3.0.26a on my Fedora 7, and when i try to add users with
smbpasswd -a username, it only works if the user exists as a linux
user... i got a Centos 4.4 system with samba 3.0.10 and it works even
if the user doesn't exists on the system.
Can anyone explain me why this happens? is i
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 15:45 +0100, Ricardo Manuel Esteves (VI) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got samba 3.0.26a on my Fedora 7, and when i try to add users with
> smbpasswd -a username, it only works if the user exists as a linux
> user... i got a Centos 4.4 system with samba 3.0.10 and it works even
> if th
Hi,
I got samba 3.0.26a on my Fedora 7, and when i try to add users with
smbpasswd -a username, it only works if the user exists as a linux
user... i got a Centos 4.4 system with samba 3.0.10 and it works even
if the user doesn't exists on the system.
Can anyone explain me why this happens? is i
Hello all.
It is possible to force Samba 3 server to create "smbd" process for
each user that open file from Terminal Server ?
Sometimes I need close files , but can't do that by "kill " since
it should close all files that opened by terminal server users ..
It any flexible way to manage open file
We have the following share:
[users]
path = /home
read only = No
inherit acls = yes
inherit permissions = yes
inherit owner = yes
the /home permissions are:
drwxr-xr-x ... root root ... /home
There are /home/user1, /home/user2, ... folders. When they ar
Hi together,
we have a network of windows and osx computers, which all using a
debian linux server as dataslave in a 100 MBit network.
Samba 3.024 is running on the debian box.
Now transfering files from the debian box to the osx clients is
working at full speed of the network.
But transfer
Ok. I think I understood something wrong. I thought the
logfile was from a member server, not from a BDC. If a BDC
creates its own name as a sambaDomain object in LDAP, then
there's a misconfiguration or a bug. A BDC does not have a
local SAM, only member servers do.
In my case you were complete
Hello,
I use samba with winbind and I want to create users on a Microsoft Active
Directory domain server.
I used the command:
net user ADD -U administrator%password -C
The user is created, but disable.
I'd like to enable it, and to add a start session script attached to this user.
The man page
35 matches
Mail list logo
