Hi Herman,
Ok, i got an idea, thanks a lot for putting your time in this and
helping me out. :)
Regards,
Kaustubh
herman wrote:
Kaustubh Chaudhari wrote:
Hi Herman.
This is really a helpful information, but i am not able to understand
why in built group we cant see a mapping for a normal
On 11/1/07, Hans-Wilhelm Heisinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> John,
>
> Thank you for the reply. Below is the output from mount and ls -al.
> Yes I can login as CPDOM+admin and create files, but connecting to the share
> as CPDOM+admin doesn't work.
>
> Hans
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mo
Kaustubh Chaudhari wrote:
Hi Herman.
This is really a helpful information, but i am not able to understand
why in built group we cant see a mapping for a normal user, as if we
look Builtin is also a OU and we have some Builtin users and groups in
it.
If i create a OU and groups or users in
Hi
We have a samba server which has been working fine for four years, SAMBA is
configured as an Active directory domain member (SECURITY=ADS in the conf
file), using Kerberos tickets to allow it to authenticate users.
SAMBA is not however performing in pure native ADS mode as it is using WINBI
Ok but I have 2000 users and 600 printers. Do you have something working
to map the printers to the users, or group of users, in the build time
of the netlogon?
How do you setup permissions in the samba to allow or deny access to the
printers? Do you set individual printers like shares in the samba
On 31/10/07 05:26, "herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hce wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can the samba be compiled by ARM cross compiler (arm/3.4.1/arm-linux)?
>> I am currently downloaded samba-3.0.26a tar ball. I guess I have
>> following two choices, please advice which one make sense.
>>
>> 1. Ru
I find having all clients point to a WINS server (whether Samba is
the WINS client or WINS server) avoids most browsing issues.
On 10/25/07, Shawn Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a problem with my long-running Samba workgroup where hosts will
> > stop
> > coming up in "View Network
I relatively recently implemented Samba 3.026a (Solaris PDC)I then
moved the PDC role to another machine. On the new pdc I 1st grabbed
the domain SID
newpdc# net rpc getsid -S oldpdc
Storing SID --for Domain MYDOMAIN in secrets.tdb
newpdc#
and then up
Edmundo Valle Neto wrote:
Marcelo Mogrovejo escreveu:
Hi
(...)
I read this documents and i begin again with samba+ldap...
This time i have not problems, except when i try to create an user
for testing.
I create a testuser and i add a password for his but when i try to
login with this user, h
Hi all
I am still unsure of the correct way to configure member servers.
I have one PDC (Samba 3.026a on Solaris 9) and several member servers
(including Samba 3.026a on Solaris 9 and 10, and Samba 3.024 on Fedora
core 6.) Each machine uses NIS for unix accounts.
The "Samba by Examble" Book i
John,
Thank you for the reply. Below is the output from mount and ls -al.
Yes I can login as CPDOM+admin and create files, but connecting to the
share as CPDOM+admin doesn't work.
Hans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 on / type ext3 (rw)
proc on /proc type proc
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 10:04 -0700, Ivan Ordonez wrote:
> What we want to do in the coming days is to turn off and upgrade the
> PDC
> and promote one of the BDC to PDC and don't miss a beat. I first
> stop
> slapd, slurpd and samba service on the PDC. I then edit the smb.conf
> file of one o
I am new to this list and fairly new to samba.
I am running samba 3.0.24 on debian etch with winbind and krb5 in ads
security mode. Everything appears to be working perfectly. I can see
users and groups with wbinfo and getent. I can even access shares I
setup using the domain admin account from
Hi,
Our domain is setup with one Primary Domain Controller and two Backup
Domain Controllers, and a member server. All domain controllers (PDC
and BDCs) are running Gentoo Linux with Samba and LDAP. The member
server (fileserver) is a SUNS machine running Solaris. We do everything
(add, ed
On 11/1/07, Hans-Wilhelm Heisinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a Samba 3.0.24-7 on Fedora 6 as a member of an Windows NT 4.0
> domain, with a simple share setup with ACLs. The permissions on the
> share from Windows XP Pro Security tab shows Everyone, and root (Unix
> Group\root) without a
I have a Samba 3.0.24-7 on Fedora 6 as a member of an Windows NT 4.0
domain, with a simple share setup with ACLs. The permissions on the
share from Windows XP Pro Security tab shows Everyone, and root (Unix
Group\root) without any Permissions. When trying to add permissions
from XP while logg
I'm seeing behavior that I was hoping somebody could explain. I have a
share set up that will be a repository for company-wide data. There are
three classes of people who can access it, readers, read/writers, and
admins. Readers and read/writers are self explanatory, admins have
read/write acces
Hello list
The below mentionned problem just occured again.
We had about 673 smbd Processes running and 1746
Locks (as reported by smbstatus) when it happened.
Again, the only unusual thing smbd.log said was:
8<
[2007/11/01 15:44:14, 0]
Have you configured NSS? "gentent passwd" shows the user?
Its "getent".
Edmundo
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi Dale, thanks for the explanation.
I understand were you are coming from now.
I certainly hope to be of help to you someday.
God bless.
Dale Schroeder wrote:
I have nothing against posix acl's. In fact, I make sure I install
the acl package on every Debian system I build. It's just a
pre
www.libeldefense.com
Yahoo! has immense reach. Without doubt, you must be in Yahoo. It can bring
you up to 50% of your traffic or more! Fortunately, you can now get listed
in Yahoo! in seven days for a cost of just $199 - often worthwhile. You
should get back your investment in a matter of days. T
Hi Herman.
This is really a helpful information, but i am not able to understand
why in built group we cant see a mapping for a normal user, as if we
look Builtin is also a OU and we have some Builtin users and groups in it.
If i create a OU and groups or users in it than i can see all those
I have enabled user shares and have the following entries in
/etc/samba/smb.conf
usershare allow guests = Yes
usershare max shares = 32
usershare owner only = No
usershare path = /var/lib/samba/usershares
usershare prefix allow list = /usr/alcoa/mesif/mes_da
Hi Dale.
Thank you for this.
I will try some tests.
Can you elaborate on why you do not like ACLs?
Had some bad experiences?
God bless.
Dale Schroeder wrote:
Jayendren,
Rather than acls, my preference (and it's only a preference) would be
to create a group for the database users. Add user1
Georgy Goshin wrote:
Definitely possible in Samba. Start with the correct POSIX
permissions on the directories, then follow the references below.
This chapter, in general
http://us4.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/AccessControls.html
and this section, in particular
http://u
Marcelo Mogrovejo escreveu:
Hi
(...)
I read this documents and i begin again with samba+ldap...
This time i have not problems, except when i try to create an user for
testing.
I create a testuser and i add a password for his but when i try to
login with this user, hi doesn't login...
for exam
Hi all
I have two samba server on the network a week woring fine, then yesterday
morning they just stopped.
In the log I get the following
any ideas whats going on ?
[2007/11/01 10:23:30, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(926)
switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 5671) conn 0x0
[2007/11/01 10
I can see, change and set any permissions with getfacl/setfacl.
I can see these permissions in Windows but cannot change some of the
properties. For example I cannot set full access rights for other groups
even if I am the owner of the directory/file. The changes are being
silently ignored. I can
28 matches
Mail list logo
