RE: [Samba] XP Pro and Samba 3.0-alpha1.9

2002-10-03 Thread Bradley W. Langhorst
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 09:14, Irving Carrion wrote: > Not in my case. The "add user script" worked in the previous version > but when I upgraded from Samba 2.2.3a to the latest CVS version it no > longer worked. The way I got it working was to use the "add machine > script". Now it works just fi

RE: [Samba] XP Pro and Samba 3.0-alpha1.9

2002-10-02 Thread Bradley W. Langhorst
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 10:21, Kalkoul Morad wrote: > I am a beginner on samba, can you explain me the means of CVS? CVS is a source code versioning system the most recent(and unstable) code is taken directly from that repository. > > and with this release can you manage Active Directory? i think

RE: [Samba] XP Pro and Samba 3.0-alpha1.9

2002-10-02 Thread Kalkoul Morad
ROTECTED] Objet : RE: [Samba] XP Pro and Samba 3.0-alpha1.9 I have Samba version 2.999+3.0cvs20 and testparm does not complain about "add machine script " command. I'm really not sure why your testparm says it's not valid. Did you try it though? This is what I get from the doc

RE: [Samba] XP Pro and Samba 3.0-alpha1.9

2002-10-02 Thread Irving Carrion
nt: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:53 AM To: 'Irving Carrion'; Kalkoul Morad; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Samba] XP Pro and Samba 3.0-alpha1.9 add machine script is not validate by checking with testparm.Is it normal? -Message d'origine- De : Irving Carrion [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [Samba] XP Pro and Samba 3.0-alpha1.9

2002-10-02 Thread Kalkoul Morad
add machine script is not validate by checking with testparm.Is it normal? -Message d'origine- De : Irving Carrion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : mercredi 2 octobre 2002 15:14 À : 'Kalkoul Morad'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [Samba] XP Pro and Samba 3.0-alpha1.9

RE: [Samba] XP Pro and Samba 3.0-alpha1.9

2002-10-02 Thread Irving Carrion
ee what ya get. IRV -Original Message- From: Kalkoul Morad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:04 AM To: 'Irving Carrion'; Kalkoul Morad; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Samba] XP Pro and Samba 3.0-alpha1.9 I believed this was enough to add a machine

RE: [Samba] XP Pro and Samba 3.0-alpha1.9

2002-10-01 Thread Kalkoul Morad
EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [Samba] XP Pro and Samba 3.0-alpha1.9 I think you need to add the "add machine script" command in your smb.conf. check man smb.conf for more info. Hope this helps. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ka

RE: [Samba] XP Pro and Samba 3.0-alpha1.9

2002-10-01 Thread Irving Carrion
PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] XP Pro and Samba 3.0-alpha1.9 Hi everybody, I set up Samba 3.0alpha1.9 on a RH7.2 and I want to configure it as a Primary Domain Controller. Below , my smb.conf: # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) # Date: 2002/10/01 09:04:58 # Global

Re: [Samba] XP Pro and Samba 3.0-alpha1.9

2002-10-01 Thread Bradley W. Langhorst
On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 12:37, Kalkoul Morad wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I set up Samba 3.0alpha1.9 on a RH7.2 and I want to configure it as a > Primary Domain Controller. > Below , my smb.conf: > # Samba config file created using SWAT > # from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) > # Date: 2002/10/01 09:04:58 >

[Samba] XP Pro and Samba 3.0-alpha1.9

2002-10-01 Thread Kalkoul Morad
Hi everybody, I set up Samba 3.0alpha1.9 on a RH7.2 and I want to configure it as a Primary Domain Controller. Below , my smb.conf: # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) # Date: 2002/10/01 09:04:58 # Global parameters [global] ;Nom du domaine workgroup