Hi Aleksander, thank you very much for spending your time on this issue.
I'm really curious to see what you find out.
Just now I checked samba code and found no RPC calls about wins browse
list implemented on server side, so I'll appreciate very much if you can
keep us informed and send the traces
Yes, sorry, that's my error.
the debug level changed to address the debug classes.
Now it is a string parameter not an integer anymore so that you can
specify different log levels for any subclass.
like all:2 passdb:5 rpc:10
In the transition I forgot to change swat.
It's in my todo list!
I'll
actually. well, you can see my original mail here:
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/2002-July/038355.html
I have proceeded beyond that now. Since I'm running on a tight schedule and
absolutely needed to get the cross-domain/cross-subnet browsing to work, I
installed MS WINS.
I h
sorry part of that mail got lost.
you must think i'm smoking crack...
somehow the log level parameter has gotten lost in the HEAD
from swat's option list. Thus any change in swat wipes out the logging.
brad
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 22:36, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:37:30AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
>
> > NULL?
> > how do i set the logging level?
>
> Ummm, debug level = x
>
> or, log level = x
... in the smb.conf, *not* in the source.
> > brad
> >
> > {"Logging Options
I have currently compiled SAMBA with the LDAP option and I SAMBA is as
of now authenticating with the LDAP server but I am looking to do two things
One... I do not want SAMBA to look on the localhost to access the user
list. In other words I want to set SAMBA up so that it uses the LDAP
data
Here, you go.
Open Windows Explorer. On the Tools menu, select Folder Options. On
the View tab, scroll down to Hidden files and Folders. There should be
two options:
Do not show hidden file and folders
Show hidden files and folders
If you have the first option selected, you will not se
Hi,
I looked at this issue, and it looks possible to accumulate the timeouts
that have occured in receive_message_or_smb and count those up.
Given that the resolution of the dead time parameter is in minutes, this
would seem to not get too far out of whack.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAI
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
> NULL?
> how do i set the logging level?
Ummm, debug level = x
or, log level = x
> brad
>
> {"Logging Options", P_SEP, P_SEPARATOR},
>
> {"admin log", P_BOOL, P_GLOBAL, &Globals.bAdminLog, NULL, NULL, 0},
> {"log level", P_
NULL?
how do i set the logging level?
brad
{"Logging Options", P_SEP, P_SEPARATOR},
{"admin log", P_BOOL, P_GLOBAL, &Globals.bAdminLog, NULL, NULL, 0},
{"log level", P_STRING, P_GLOBAL, NULL, handle_debug_list, NULL, 0},
{"debuglevel", P_STRING, P_GLOBAL, NULL, h
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 05:00:43PM -0700, Jim Myers wrote:
:
> Also, please explain about NT vs DOS error codes.
I just finished writing something up about that. See:
http://ubiqx.org/cifs/SMB.html#SMB.5
Basically, DOS codes originally mapped to the DOS format, which had a
one-byte error cla
Andrew, you mentioned that Samba should produce the same error codes as a Windows remote share.
Here's an interesting case: The test below runs correctly on native NTFS, but fails as shown below with a remote Win2K share.
Samba produces the same error code as the remote case which means it fails
OK, here's the diff for the first problem I mentioned (I'm just learning about diffs so please correct me if this isn't correct).
BTW the error is that on and nt_create_and_X for a new directory with the temp flag set. IFSTEST says this is invalid, so this patch returns the proper NT error code.
Thanks
here is the brief info
user on nfs mounted unix share ( home directory ) : platform solaris 2.6
samba 2.0.7 and samba2.2.5 running on independent ultra suns
users win2k clients
smb.conf ( homes section )
[homes]
available = yes
comment = Home Directory for [%u] [
Hannes Schmidt wrote:
>
> As you suggested, I checked how other NSS libraries deal with this problem.
> The libnss_files module in glibc doesn't leave files open like
> libnss_winbind.
>
> E.g., getpwent() (I should say its implementation in libnss_files) and
> setpwent()
> open /etc/passwd and
-Original Message-
From: Bert Buckley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:51 PM
To: Green, Paul
Subject: Re: Possible bug: File changed as we read it
Paul,
Thanks for your reply.
I mount the file system with smbmount from a Win 2000 system (and
I have
Jim Myers wrote:
>
> The IFSTEST suite is only available as part of the IFS development
> kit.
OK.
> There are a number of other differences I have found running other
> parts of IFSTEST.
> If I fix (some of) these, what should I do with the fixes?
Send them here, and (possibly, but I don't pa
The IFSTEST suite is only available as part of the IFS development kit.
There are a number of other differences I have found running other parts of IFSTEST.
If I fix (some of) these, what should I do with the fixes?
Am I correct in assuming that Samba shares should produce exactly the same resul
Jim Myers wrote:
>
> Has anyone ever run Microsoft IFSTEST suite against Samba shares?
Probably not - but it sounds like a good idea. Is it publicly
available, or only in the IFS development kit?
> When I try to run these test cases, the 3rd test () fails on a
> directory create with the tempo
Kai Krueger wrote:
> P.S. perhaps adding const all along would make it clear which parameters are
> "in parameters" and which are "out paramters"
Yes, that would be a very good idea.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager, Authentication S
thanks for your replies, really appreciate it
i was looking at way to pinpoint the problem that w2k cleint is having
regarding all files and folder not visible when mapped to unix home drive
can you guys give some thoughts about it as well :-
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartle
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
> thanks
> but why do you think samba is looking for it
Samba is looking for it because Windows is asking it to look for it!
> -Original Message-
> From: Bradley W. Langhorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:2
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 05:16:37PM -0500, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
> exactly, because its not causing to every unix user who is mapping
> but just curious why samba is looking for it
No. You are missing the point. Samba is *not* looking for it.
Windows is looking for it.
> -Original Mess
samba is NOT looking for it.
windows clients asks samba to tell if it exists!
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 00:26, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
> thanks
> but why do you think samba is looking for it
--
Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xsec s.r.l.
via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano
tel. +39 02 2399 7130
Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
>
> thanks
> but why do you think samba is looking for it
Becouse the windows client asks for it.
MS Windows Explorer looks for 'desktop.ini' in *every* directory
displayed, unless explicitly configured otherwise.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
thanks
but why do you think samba is looking for it
-Original Message-
From: Bradley W. Langhorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:22 PM
To: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Desktop.ini and samba - Please comme
Hi,
I have now got some profiling data from a single user NetBench run.
NetBench claims that it transferred 97.821 MB in 599.961 seconds and thus
gave the server a throughput of 1.304Mb/s!
Actually multiplying out the numbers gives the same result.
However, when you look at what Samba says, y
the desktop.ini is the file that stores the
folder view settings.
you can disable it by turning off the UI checkbox that says remember
each folder's settings.
i think it is not your problem.
brad
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 18:04, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
>
>
> I was just wondering why does samb
exactly, because its not causing to every unix user who is mapping
but just curious why samba is looking for it
-Original Message-
From: Green, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:06 PM
To: 'Javid Abdul-AJAVID1'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: R
This is Windows not Samba!
Slow down a little...things will make more sense.
PG
> -Original Message-
> From: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 6:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Desktop.ini and samba - Please comme
I was just wondering why does samba look for Desktop.ini when i am mapping
to my home directory from w2k
running samba 2.2.5 on sol2.6 , client is w2k
am troubleshooting an weird issue where am not able to see all my unix home
directory files on w2k
log level10 is showing me that samba is look
I am trying to find why some files and directories are not visible
from W2K windows explorers though they exist on unix home directory
permissions are fine ( 755 )on unix side
following is the portion of log ( level 10 )
[2002/07/31 16:16:05, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1143)
is_in_path: public_h
Bert Buckley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes (edited for brevity):
> Synopsis:
>
> I do daily dumps from a Linux box of the Windows machines on
> my network. (Kernel 2.4.7-10, Redhat 7.2., samba-2.2.1a-4 )
> These are done overnight.
>
> I mount the appropriate shared directories as a samba
As you suggested, I checked how other NSS libraries deal with this problem.
The libnss_files module in glibc doesn't leave files open like
libnss_winbind.
E.g., getpwent() (I should say its implementation in libnss_files) and
setpwent()
open /etc/passwd and endpwent() closes it. getpwnam() and ge
- Original Message -
From: "Jelmer Vernooij" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002
5:53 PM
> [ Ok, I've switched off gpg signing for all samba lists... ]
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm working on the new sam system currently and was wondering whether
> the following patch should be appl
Title: RE: New sam system
They are not encrypted, they are simply signed. The problem is, it attaches them to the email as a separate attachment. Some email readers don't automatically display certain attachments, so the main body of the message is all that is displayed. Since there isn't one
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 19:13, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 02:54:06AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote about 'Re: New sam
>system':
> > On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > > [ Ok, I've switched off gpg signing for all samba lists... ]
> Weird that mutt generates encrypte
> 1. If it encounters a DENY (negative) ACE that denies any of the bits
> requested, it denies access.
Correct
> 2. If it encounters ALLOW ACLs that allows any of the bits,
> but not all,
> it continues? Is this true. Does it accumulate permission
> bits until the
> requested bits are avail
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 08:12:04PM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote about 'Re:
New sam system':
> >-NTSTATUS sam_get_user_by_sid(NT_USER_TOKEN *access, uint32
> >access_desired, DOM_SID *usersid, SAM_USER_HANDLE **user)
> >-NTSTATUS sam_get_user_by_name(NT_USER_TOKEN *access, uint32
> >ac
In a hurry...
At 17:53 31.07.2002 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>[ Ok, I've switched off gpg signing for all samba lists... ]
>
>Hi!
>
>I'm working on the new sam system currently and was wondering whether
>the following patch should be applied to
>source/sam/SAM-Interface-handles.txt:
>
>-NTSTATU
I though I'd share some NetBench results on one of our servers.
Server:
4 x 1.5 GHz P4, 256K L3, 32MB L4, 2 GB memory
4 x 1Gbps acenic ethernet
14 SCSI disks in hardware RAID1 with 128 MB writeback NVRAM
SuSE 8.0, 2.4.18 kernel
Samba 2.2.3a
Ext3 fs
Clients:
48 x 866 MHz PIII running Windows 2000
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 12:06:23PM -0500, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
:
> SMB is properiety of whom
It's all in my book. http://ubiqx/org/cifs/
SMB was created by IBM, but is now under Microsoft's control. Almost
entirely.
> just curious how does samba team cope up with changes that microsoft
> SMB is properiety of whom
Microsoft and others
> just curious how does samba team cope up with changes that microsoft makes
> in their cifs.
> do they put it out there in open as what they are using and what not
Microsoft has not (barely) documented it's protocol. The samba
developers have prog
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 02:54:06AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote about 'Re: New sam
system':
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > [ Ok, I've switched off gpg signing for all samba lists... ]
Weird that mutt generates encrypted files when I tell it to only sign
it... :-(
> > I'm workin
SMB is properiety of whom
just curious how does samba team cope up with changes that microsoft makes
in their cifs.
do they put it out there in open as what they are using and what not
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July
Has anyone ever run Microsoft IFSTEST suite against Samba shares?
When I try to run these test cases, the 3rd test () fails on a directory create with the temporary option.
This is considered invalid by Microsoft and Samba flunks this test.
Module nttrans.c needs the following code added in r
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:20:03AM -0500, Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
:
> > Is samba implments CIFS.
Yes, Samba is a CIFS implementation.
> > I thought CIFS is based on SMB
Yes, CIFS (Common Internet FileSystem) is Microsoft's marketing name for
SMB.
> > am assuming SMB is opensource protocol
Hi,
I am trying to clear up the fine points if ACL in Windows and POSIX.
Under windows, user asks for RPERM, and the ACL code walks the ACEs. I am
under the impression that it does:
1. If it encounters a DENY (negative) ACE that denies any of the bits
requested, it denies access.
2. If it en
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> [ Ok, I've switched off gpg signing for all samba lists... ]
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm working on the new sam system currently and was wondering whether
> the following patch should be applied to
> source/sam/SAM-Interface-handles.txt:
Well, I would say you
[ Ok, I've switched off gpg signing for all samba lists... ]
Hi!
I'm working on the new sam system currently and was wondering whether
the following patch should be applied to
source/sam/SAM-Interface-handles.txt:
-NTSTATUS sam_get_user_by_sid(NT_USER_TOKEN *access, uint32 access_desired, DOM_S
Its security thing
you configure samba for user security with encryption set to no i guess
you have to change it to domain or change the registry on windows 2k to send
passsword in clear text
-Original Message-
From: BIANCARDI, ROBERTO [R&D/0467]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
[NON-Text Body part not included]
These messages that only consist of a PGP encoded piece are getting damn
annoying.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(I should have sent this to the list, not directly to Tim. Sorry.)
- Danno
-Original Message-
From: Dan Coppock
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 9:16 AM
To: 'Tim Potter'
Subject: RE: winbindd_cm.c leak in failed connection cache
>>On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 10:40:54AM -0700, Dan Coppock wro
I tried to connect a share directory (with security = user) from my PC
(win 2000) and the system works properly.
>From all other PC's i tested in my company there's an error like:
"The mapped network drive could not be created because the following
error has occurred:
The
msg.pgp
Description: PGP message
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Andrew Theurer wrote:
>
> > 3. The report claims 163.471 MBytes of data Transferred, yet a full
> > capture is larger than 334 MBytes (that capture dropped a few frames).
>
> Generally my Netbench reported peak throughput is about 10-15% lower than
> what I see in my sar re
Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 wrote:
>
> am exhausted for solving this.
> using samba2.0.7 and 2.2.5 in 5000 nis/nis+ and win2k domain environment
> samba member server in domain giving access to nfs home directories
> everything working smooth since last 3 years
> lately couple of users unix home director
> 3. The report claims 163.471 MBytes of data Transferred, yet a full
> capture is larger than 334 MBytes (that capture dropped a few frames).
Generally my Netbench reported peak throughput is about 10-15% lower than
what I see in my sar report. The only thing that comes to mind is that the
num
> > Is samba implments CIFS.
> > I thought CIFS is based on SMB
> > am assuming SMB is opensource protocol
CIFS is the new name microsoft gave to the smb protocol their clients
speak.
> > Just wondering if am running samba 2.2.5 does it mean am running CIFS
> > also what version of CIFS?
It does
am exhausted for solving this.
using samba2.0.7 and 2.2.5 in 5000 nis/nis+ and win2k domain environment
samba member server in domain giving access to nfs home directories
everything working smooth since last 3 years
lately couple of users unix home directory are not completely listed when
se
> Hi all,
> Is samba implments CIFS.
> I thought CIFS is based on SMB
> am assuming SMB is opensource protocol
> Just wondering if am running samba 2.2.5 does it mean am running CIFS
> also what version of CIFS?
> when i sniffing SMB packets which commands should i be looking at CIFS or
SMB
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear sirs!
> We have following error messages in log.smbd, running samba 2.2.5 under
> Redhat 7.0.19:
>
> [2002/07/31 10:41:58, 0]
> rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(606)
> spoolss_io_devmode: Unknown specversion in devicemode [0x40d
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Fredrik Ohrn wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Fredrik Ohrn wrote:
>
> >
> > source don't print anything. Does anyone have suggestions why/how samba
> > triggers this lengthy search?
> >
>
> As always: Use Google first, ask questions later.
>
> The crulpit here is the initg
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 12:20:27PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 11:15:50AM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:29:44PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > can you tell me which lines of proto do give you that error?
> > > just cut&paste the line wi
"Lars O.Grobe" wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> again, I have to ask a question about problems using samba 3.0 - although I
> know that the cvs sources are not for production... ;-)
>
> I have a version of mid-july up and running, with the accounts in smbpasswd.
> However, I have two problems, one with
Hallo,
I have to shares:
fstab.conf:
/dev/sdb1 /mnt/xfsxfs defaults0
1
/dev/sdb2 /mnt/ext3 ext3defaults0
1
smb.conf:
[global]
create mask = 0777
force create mode = 0
Dear sirs!
We have following error messages in log.smbd, running samba 2.2.5 under
Redhat 7.0.19:
[2002/07/31 10:41:58, 0]
rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(606)
spoolss_io_devmode: Unknown specversion in devicemode [0x40d]
[2002/07/31 10:41:58, 0]
rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spools
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 11:15:50AM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:29:44PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > can you tell me which lines of proto do give you that error?
> > just cut&paste the line with error thanks.
>
> Never mind about that one. After one big "make clean"
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:29:44PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
> can you tell me which lines of proto do give you that error?
> just cut&paste the line with error thanks.
Never mind about that one. After one big "make clean", configure
and make went fine. Sorry for false alarm.
Makefiles creation s
"Michael B.Allen" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:24:48 +1000
> Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > I wish someone
> > > > > would do a real analysis and write some practical documentation.
> > > >
> > > > A volenteer! Great! I'll see what help I can be, but you might want
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:24:48 +1000
Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I wish someone
> > > > would do a real analysis and write some practical documentation.
> > >
> > > A volenteer! Great! I'll see what help I can be, but you might want to
> >
> > This is such a crappy argumen
71 matches
Mail list logo
