On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 01:56:45PM +0200, Michael Steffens wrote:
> the attached enhancements of SID related debug messages were quite
> useful for me for tracking down where "strange" SIDs winbindd
> complained about are coming from.
>
> Being there I found that my suspicous SIDs are included in
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 02:34:03PM -0500, Green, Paul wrote:
> The "everything" target makes some additional files that are not cleaned-up
> by "make clean". This patch corrects the oversight. It should be applied to
> both head and 3_0. Tested today by me on Stratus VOS.
Checked in.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 09:41:55PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Tim Potter wrote:
>
> > I was poking around in the segv signal handling code today as I'm in a
> > situation where an actual core dump would be handy to have.
> >
> > The in
I was poking around in the segv signal handling code today as I'm in a
situation where an actual core dump would be handy to have.
The intent of the current code looks like core dumps are to be made in
$LOGDIR/corefiles but the dump_core() function is never executed as the
argument to fault_setup(
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:37:33PM -0500, Roylance, Stephen D. wrote:
> I'm trying to use some of the functions in winbind_nss.c in my winbind_aix.c
> module. It compiles, but when I try to link it fill_pwent is unresolved.
> What do I need to link against in order to get fill_pwent and such from
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:28:33PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Yes, to support it properly, the underlying filesystem should include
> > > all streams when you cp/mv/rm/... And a "portable" backup/restore could
> > > be interesting!
> > >
> > > However, I'm having trouble getting Samba
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 03:46:59PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
> Yes, to support it properly, the underlying filesystem should include
> all streams when you cp/mv/rm/... And a "portable" backup/restore could
> be interesting!
>
> However, I'm having trouble getting Samba to return goofy names like
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 03:01:58PM -0800, Orwig, Paul wrote:
[...]
> My "fix" is neither pretty nor proper.
>
> What is needed to fix the configure script to handle HPUX 11.0 properly??
I'd love to know as well. Can you send me the output of config.log in
private mail?
Tim.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 02:12:17PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> why did you remove SID_NAME_NONE
>
> vars from type 'enum SID_NAME_USE' should be initialize with SID_NAME_NONE
I removed it because it wasn't used anywhere!
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:09:19PM +1030, Adam Fox wrote:
> When I ran configure the following was reported about the printf functions:
>
> checking for asprintf declaration... no
> checking for vasprintf declaration... no
> checking for vsnprintf declaration... yes
> checking for snprintf declar
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 11:22:54AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i tried to compile the current CVS today and found a typo and missing
> arguments.
>
> i append a small diff, that fixes these problems..
Hi - someone forgot their janitorial duties with regard to the
smbwrapper support. I've
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 08:36:56PM -0500, Scott Prive wrote:
> > > I'd like to contribute to such an effort -- or start one (using Perl).
> > > I have plenty of time for such a thing, while looking for a SQA job :-/.
> >
> > Well hopefully we can get something checked in so people can start
> > wo
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 06:03:05PM -0500, Scott Prive wrote:
> I hope this is the correct forum to request this information...
>
> I'm looking for information on the Samba test and release process. I expect
> there's nothing formal like Mozilla, but is there a group or individual who
> has a prim
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 02:13:17PM -0500, Dave Collier-Brown wrote:
> For that last few years, I've been using a makefile
> to download and build samba, based on the instructions
> in http://us1.samba.org/samba/cvs.html
> These are the same instructions that we put in "Using Samba",
> and are
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 09:10:23PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Is there any reason I should not apply this patch to Samba HEAD?
I think the patch was eaten by Mailman. Please re-send as text/plain.
Without even seeing the patch (-: it's definitely a good idea.
Tim.
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:39:25PM +, Ronan Waide wrote:
> using setdriver in rpcclient wasn't working for me, so I traced
> execution and discovered that it uses open_printer_ex with an access
> level of MAXIMUM_ALLOWED_ACCESS. This only grants me read access to
> the printer when I am in fac
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 10:25:27PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > > > > This seems like a good way to do it. Does anyone have any objections if I
> > > > > do so?
> > > >
> > > > Why do we need it? Just call lp_default_server_announce() and check if
> > > > the SV_TYPE_PRINTQ_SERVER bit is se
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 10:10:53PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > > This seems like a good way to do it. Does anyone have any objections if I
> > > do so?
> >
> > Why do we need it? Just call lp_default_server_announce() and check if
> > the SV_TYPE_PRINTQ_SERVER bit is set. If no print shar
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 06:54:37AM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Vance Lankhaar wrote:
>
> > What about adding a value to the printing param? -> "printing =
> > disabled"
>
> This seems like a good way to do it. Does anyone have any objections if I
> do so?
Why do we need
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 01:38:50PM -0800, Chere Zhou wrote:
> This patch works for me. Thanks a lot!
>
> But I do have to manually edit the file, because long lines got wrapped in
> the email.
There's a neat-o program called 'unwrapdiff' that can do all the
hard for for you. Under debian it
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 05:10:12PM +, Ronan Waide wrote:
> > try again with HEAD. The Samba 2-2 client rpc code cannot handle
> > fragmented PDU's too well.
>
> Sorry, should have mentioned. This is with HEAD. Tim Potter has been
> having a look at tcpdump plus
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 10:21:04PM +0100, Juergen Hasch wrote:
> actually it looks quite good :-)
That's good to hear!
> Attached is a capture from two W2K machines talking to each other.
> Packet No. 19 shows the NT NOTIFY response packet.
>
> This capture was made using the Windows version of
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:24:57AM -0800, Herb Lewis wrote:
> > > Isn't the second check for newline redundant?
> >
> > Looks like it to me.
>
> Only redundant if we can guarentee that the cmd string will only have
> one \n at the end and no other ones embeded in the string. I don't
> know enoug
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:23:14PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Better still why not use poll() instead of select() in the winbindd
> > main loop?
>
> Because not everyone has poll() :-(. Some have poll build on select.
> Some people have poll() and it doesn't work So many bugs, so
> l
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 04:26:21PM -0500, Michael B. Allen wrote:
> > This is set at compile-time, not run-time. This line:
> >
> > #define FD_SETSIZE 2048 /* Max # of winbindd connections */
> >
> > must occur before the first invocation of .
> >
> > This could be a build option, but it mig
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:47:38AM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> Scenario: Fresh compile of Samba 3.0, both a20 and a21. Attempt to use attached
>smb.conf.
>
> EXANET-QA is a part of the EXANET-IL domain (e.g - EXANET-IL is the parent domain).
>EXANET-QA is supposedly set in compatibility mode.
>
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:32:09PM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Martin Pool wrote:
>
> > The Samba 3.0 roadmap mentions this as a wishlist item for 3.x. I'm
> > interested in looking at it.
> >
> > Has anybody else already worked on it?
>
> JF started on it, but
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 12:44:54PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
> You may or may not have noticed, but wbinfo -m doesn't work on
> SAMBA_3_0, and -u or -g don't return users/groups from trusted domains.
>
> The problem was in winbindd_util.c. init_domain_list would reset the
> list using free_domain_
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 03:53:05PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
> We have a site with SAMBA_3_0 where it takes 12-15 minutes to initialize
> winbindd's cache (locks/winbindd_cache.tdb) every time winbindd
> restarts. While this is going on, users can't authenticate. (~12,000
> users and 9,000 groups
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:23:30PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> The bug apparently came in Andrew Bartlett's merge in 1.45; the
> provenance of it I don't know. (TNG?) This patch ought to be applied
> to 2.2, HEAD, 3.0, and APPL_HEAD.
>
> Tim, how's this patch?
How about this - I've collapsed t
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:06:04AM +0100, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> > Attached patch can be seen as proposal to discuss behavior of gencache in
> > case when it is used in applications running under non-priviledged
> > accounts so that O_RDWR|O_CREAT always fails against system-wide
> > lock_path(
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:12:58AM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> using google, I found out that some time ago there was some code in
> samba-tng for remotely changing the registry via rpc's.
>
> Are there any plans to implement this in Samba (3?)?
> Did it work, would it be possible to extra
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:50:27AM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> > I still think we _need_ to introduce a "server role" paramter, leaving
> > the other active for tuning, but so that new admins will not get mad to
> > have a decent configuration.
> >
> > server role = share|server|member|
Er, should I be worried about this warning?
libsmb/clireadwrite.c: In function `cli_issue_read':
libsmb/clireadwrite.c:54: warning: right shift count >= width of type
libsmb/clireadwrite.c: In function `cli_issue_write':
libsmb/clireadwrite.c:301: warning: right shift count >= width of type
It's
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 05:06:32PM +, Ronan Waide wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> ran this command:
> rpcclient -U Administrator%password PDC -c "getdriver PRINTER"
>
> and got this output:
>
> [Windows 4.0]
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Hi - I've fixed this in the latest CVS. Thanks for repo
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 02:54:19PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > > Is the any way for our pre 3.0 Samba servers to participate
> > > in AD and how do you set it up?
> >
> > Tridge has written a HOWTO which should be up to date with the
> > latest Samba code. Look at the file ADS-HOWTO.txt in
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 12:34:44PM -0500, Dave Aitel wrote:
> Has anyone been able to send a DCE-RPC PDU fragment via SMBTrans? I seem
> to be getting PIPE BUSY as the SMB response from the Win2K server I'm
> testing against.
Samba does it all the time! (-:
Look in rpc_client/cli_pipe.c and/or
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 09:02:41AM -0500, Damian, G. C. (Gerald) wrote:
[...]
> Is the any way for our pre 3.0 Samba servers to participate
> in AD and how do you set it up?
Tridge has written a HOWTO which should be up to date with the
latest Samba code. Look at the file ADS-HOWTO.txt in the
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:54:19AM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> Can anyone point me at documentation on the limitations of a downlevel
> server being a member server in an AD network?
>
> The specific case I am thinking of is a Samba-2.2.x-based server.
I don't have any documentation but I c
I've just upgrade the CVS pserver running on samba.org. If anyone sees
any problems please let me know via email.
Luckily we are running the anonymous CVS pserver in a chroot jail which
is updated via rsync from the actual repository so the effects of anyone
exploiting the bug would be minimal.
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 01:11:14AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:31:48PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> > Here's my idea for fixing this in appliance-head, without reworking
> > the mutex reference count.
>
> Thanks for that - I've just checked in something close to th
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 08:40:55AM -0500, Green, Paul wrote:
> > [2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(607)
> > spoolss_io_devmode: Unknown specversion in devicemode [0x0]
> > [2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(608)
> > spoolss
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 02:42:39PM +0930, Barry Robinson wrote:
> Not sure if this is the right mailing list to direct this to, but just
> wondering if anyone would know of any functionality in using the KXRPC
> service through Samba?
>
> Basically you have to install the KXRPC service on a Windo
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 08:24:18PM -0600, Matt Roberts, GRDA wrote:
> First, please accept my thanks for a really great product. I use Samba
> extensively and really enjoy it.
I'm glad you enjoy Samba so much. (-:
[...]
> In the NMBd debug output (nmbd run with -d 255), I find this excerpt:
>
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 07:31:58PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> Mirror updates are also down.
Probably because rsync is also run out of xinetd.
Tim.
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 10:06:19PM +, Ronan Waide wrote:
> just spotted this while leafing through the CVS tree (some code elided
> for clarity)
Thanks - I've committed a fix for this.
Tim.
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 09:32:26PM +0100, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> Does anyone know what happened to CVS server ? Neither cvs tree
> update nor browsing links on samba-cvs work. All started yesterday
> or day before (more-less).
I've restarted xinetd (again). Not sure what's going on - the xine
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 08:26:40AM +1100, Luke Howard wrote:
> >[Question 3. What exactly does Kerberos do in the server? If Kerberos is used only
>for initial authentication,
> >then all I need to do is PKINIT in the filesystem on UNIX, right? Or, does
>Kerberos actually check a ticket per
>
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 05:42:25PM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> > > stored in clear text in secrets.tdb (HEAD) when i join an NT 4.0
> > > domain? It doesn't store the the last change time either.
> > > Unless someone yells, i'm going to fix this.
> >
> > Er, it's always been in cl
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 05:29:03PM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> stored in clear text in secrets.tdb (HEAD) when i join an NT 4.0
> domain? It doesn't store the the last change time either.
> Unless someone yells, i'm going to fix this.
Er, it's always been in clear text. Or are yo
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 10:34:24AM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> > While convenient for web browsers, it's not exactly backwards-compatible
> > for both GPG and the average sysadmin who's probably struggling with
> > verifying PGP signatures for the first time. It's not Samba's fault;
> >
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:44:36AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've never done anything in configure.in. What about the following?
I think I fixed this in head already. I'll have to do some janitorial
merging when I get in to work. I'm surprised I haven't been busted
already by Jeremy. (
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 05:01:52PM +, John H Terpstra wrote:
> > > >Great that you decided, but no one told me about that.
> > > >And the Makefile had them going to $(LIBDIR).
>
> Every time any of us make any change to a path for any file - PLEASE BE
> AWARE: It may affect our binary packagi
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 01:21:21PM +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > here's a patch that added the 'modules path' parameter.
> >
> > lp_modules_path() is prefixed to all lp_modules() witch are not start with
> > '/' (not absolute pathes)
> >
> > the default for lp_modules_path() is selectable b
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 03:16:09PM -0600, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> > Where do I get the samba codesigning key? How do I import it? How
> > do I know I got the right one?
> >
> > What do I do if it doesn't verify?
>
> I always wondered if someone uploaded a tarball with a trojan, what'
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 06:37:13PM +0100, Guenther Deschner wrote:
> recent CVS-winbinds in HEAD and 3_0 are no longer able to allocate
> u|gids if you start from scratch (with an empty idmap).
Whoops - that was a bug fix I had forgotten to merge. I'm just fixing
it up and committing now.
Jere
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 11:34:15AM +1100, Luke Howard wrote:
>
> The uuid_to_string() function breaks including the OSF DCE headers
> in Samba (which we need for our DCE funnel) as there is a similarly
> named function in DCE.
>
> Any chance you could either use the same signature as the OSF DC
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 07:32:06PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > In the Samba HEAD and 3.0 branches however the parameter behaves more
> > like the RestrictAnonymous registry setting. Only 'restrict anonymous = 1'
> > is currently supported though.
>
> I'm going to do some research, and fig
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:50:47PM -0500, Yannick Mercier wrote:
> I am running 2.2.5 and I would like to know if the
> "restrict anonymous" as been implemented correctly, as it was supposed
> to behave from the start, in order to deny
> ALL anonymous connections as stated in the man :
> "When
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:40:25PM +0100, Michael Steffens wrote:
> recently David Shapiro complained about getent group not working
> in large domain groups, in particular "Domain Users":
>
> http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/2002-November/040646.html
> Resolved the problem in m
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 03:52:03PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/debug/base/system_erro
> > r_codes.asp?frame=false
>
> Err. AFAIK, "error code 0" means "Success", in nearly every errno system
> I've seen, btw.
>
> I've seen an error code 0 once in Samba, a
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 01:42:22PM -0500, Mike Gerdts wrote:
> > Now, one problem. nscd (Name Service Caching Daemon) will now run! That
> > sounds good, right, because normally when winbind is in nsswitch.conf, nscd
> > bails? Well, when nscd is running, name resolution is done by nscd, NOT th
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 10:31:51PM +0100, Guenther Deschner wrote:
> a very small fix for the Makefile...
> -x1 LIBS="$(LIBS)" \
> + LIBS="$(LIBS)" \
Thanks - you can tell I'm an emacs user and that my control key
doesn't work very well. (-:
Tim.
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 05:12:23PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 04:58:36PM +0100, Guillaume LACHENAL wrote:
> > as 3.0 is still in alpha state, do you think is there a way
> > to use 'net rpc vampire' from 3.0 on samba 2.2.6 ?
>
> No, not possible. That's really a 3.0 o
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 10:38:32AM -0600, Steven French wrote:
> >Scripts run just fine, but binaries give me:
> > "-bash: ./command: cannot
> >execute binary file" along with "modprobe: modprobe:
> >Can't locate module binfmt-464c" in syslog
>
> Forgot to copy he list on my earlier response.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 11:09:11PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Domain local groups existed under Windows NT 4.0. They were just
> > available among DC's of the domain. See my other post in response to JF.
>
> To my knowledge (derived from some doc on msdn) they are a different
> thing. local
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:24:22PM -0500, Kelledin wrote:
> Minor bugfix in the pidfile creation function. I figured I'd
> pass it on to you people as well...I hope this is the correct
> list. I've been using it on an NT domain controller since May
> with no ill effects.
Well spotted. Appli
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 07:36:25AM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > It is the wrong place to do it. If some data should only be accessible
> > by root then it should live in secrets.tdb otherwise it should go
> > somewhere else.
>
> I know. This is just experimental code playing with the thoug
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 08:41:15AM +1000, Tim Potter wrote:
> The smbcacls program was written before anyone understood access masks
> and generic mappings properly. The individual bitmasks are defined in
> WINNT.H if you have Visual C++. They are all the constants starting
> with
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 11:31:03PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Unfortunately escaping didn't work either - so you're probably right
> > assuming that names are not supported.
> > Do you know where I get the hex code for the NT-ACLs ?
>
> I don't know of anywhere to find these other than in
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 09:00:17PM -0400, Green, Paul wrote:
> HEAD has cli_dfs.c in the directory source/rpc_client.
> 2_2 and 3_0 have cli_dfs.c in the directory source/libsmb.
>
> These file locations match source/Makefile.in *except* in 3_0, where it
> claims that cli_dfs.c is in source/rpc_
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:58:18AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> > > 17) Merge winbindd with current (more advanced) state of play in
> > > APPLIANCE_HEAD
> >
> > Can anyone enlighten to me as to what exactly that means? What
> > functionality was added, what fixes were applied, etc
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:47:38PM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> To initiate this process we'd "only" need a standardized protocol for
> the socket communication. Andrew said that doesn't exist and won't with
> regard to winbind. I'd like to focus the discussion in this direction.
>
> - is the w
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 10:59:25PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is a surprisingly little (compiled, but not tested) patch that
> mainly should do the following:
>
> Implement a rid allocator in secrets.tdb. This might not be the right
> place to do it, but as we are one-domain with pas
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 02:25:53AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> While Volker has written the command net {get,set}localsid, it would be
> nice if it could do the following:
>
> net getlocalsid name
>
> and
>
> net setlocalsid name=SID
Sounds good - can you make the name part optional a
I'm just wondering whether it is strictly necessary to uppercase the
username and domain name when performing a session setup. Applying the
following patch should not break anything and would make smbclient be
able to test for case sensitivity bugs in the remote server.
The behaviour of uppercas
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 12:54:47PM +0300, Gavrie Philipson wrote:
> I think I've found a bug in the winbind caching mechanism.
> In winbindd_cache.c, in the function query_user, the user info is looked
> up in the cache. If it isn't found, the info structure is initialized to
> zero and the backe
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:10:23AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > You assume that any cached data will be in null terminated string format
> > which is not always the case.
>
> I understand this is a design property - it's up to the caller to mess with
> structs etc. This keeps the cache
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:15:36PM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> This is first implementation of caching mechanism. It includes
> both lib/gencache.c code and utils/net_cache.c as command-line
> control/testing tool.
>
> comments are welcome
Rafal, that looks pretty good. Since you ask, I d
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 06:42:16PM -0500, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> Earlier today, Microsoft's knowledge base appeared to be down. All the
> decorations would appear, but the content was missing. It now seems that
> ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/developr/drg/CIFS/ is also unavailable. I'm curio
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:05:57PM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
> > > This looks ok, but you did test the server code after you made
> > > the changes right? Sorry, but I'm a little paranoid about this
> > > code since it took me longer than it should have to work correctly
> >
> > I did -
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 08:43:55AM -0500, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> Ahh. I didn't realize that you wanted a persistent cache, though I'm a
> bit concerned with the idea of caching NBT name resolution long-term. A
> local NBT name cache should last only a few minutes. Sure, it might be
Ch
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 12:40:10AM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> After some talks on #samba-technical the idea of redesiging
> namecache has raised. The problem is that current namecache
> is probably broken in some parts (as far as I and others have
> seen) and yet another cache for trusted d
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:47:59PM -0600, Jim McDonough wrote:
> >It looks like the recent changes to 'correct' NTLMSSP have broken NTLMv2
> >in some way - Probably in much the same way that we suddenly got LM
> >based session keys once we got the rest correct.
> Works fine for me, but I'm the fi
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 09:18:22AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > (For reference, WINBINDD_DOMAIN allows the user to specify what domains
> > > winbind will return entries in - instead of all trusted domains)
> >
> > You haven't replaced it with anything. I think being able to exclude
> >
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 11:24:43PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> This patch removes WINBINDD_DOMAIN, and some of the misguided (and
> fruitless) attempts to prevent winbind from calling smbd recursivly. (I
> fixed that the 'proper' way, and the worst case is a pipe timeout of 30
> sec, not a l
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 07:26:09PM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> This is a long standing bug in our client code that can't handle
> fragmented PDUs. It's been on my list to fix for a while and maybe
> I'll get around to it next week :-)
Oh wow - I didn't know that. Thanks for the info.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 01:06:40PM +0200, Thomas Reifferscheid wrote:
> If I have more then 21 printers in smb.conf I get
>
> [2002/08/15 12:30:50, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_werror(618)
> 000c status: WERR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER
>
>
> with the rpc "enumprinters".
>
> What the heck is th
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 12:29:32AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> > We run SAMBA on a Unix box with case sensitive file naming (i.e. standard
> > Unix usage).
> > Relevant entries in smb.conf
> > case sensitive = yes
>
> This is really bad. Do no do this unless you are willing to suffer
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 10:40:54AM -0700, Dan Coppock wrote:
> I'm seeing a slow winbind leak when the dc for a trusted domain is
> permanently unreachable (it's down, or administratively unavailable). It
> looks like in winbindd_cm.c, when the controller name cannot be looked up,
> or when the
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 11:05:05AM -0400, David Collier-Brown wrote:
> > Please if even we pass functionality to net make it so it does not need
> > a running samba to work for local management as current utilities do.
>
> Might I restate that as
> 1) "there should be one way to do
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:17:34AM -0700, Ben Johnson wrote:
> This is part of a packet dump that ends with the STATUS_PIPE_BUSY. If I
> remove the user from just a few groups then I never get the
> STATUS_PIPE_BUSY message and the second request goes through. But
> nothing else (that I see so
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 06:59:31PM -0700, Ben Johnson wrote:
> The problem comes when, after I succeed in getting a very large list of
> group names, I ask for another. The second request fails and I get an
> NT error code of STATUS_PIPE_BUSY. Does anyone know what that means?
The latest schoo
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 03:56:16PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Hope that's enough currently,
Here's some info from Microsoft on the topic of security and SIDs:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/security/Security/security_identifiers_sids_.asp
http://support.microso
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 04:30:06AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> [Added Samba-technical so that this discussion can be recorded]
Please speak slowly and clearly into the microphone.
> > >The SEC_DESC contains the Owner SID and the Primary Group
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 07:19:46PM +0200, Johann Hanne wrote:
> > No need for that. Just download the mod_ntlm_winbind CVS module from
> > samba.org (CVSWEB link:
> > http://cvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/mod_ntlm_winbind/ ) and fix it up
> > for the current protocol.
> Oh. Didn't think this was
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 06:01:41PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
> any objection into adding a function to talloc to import a previously
> allocated memory?
>
> something like that:
>
> bool talloc_memorize(TALLOC_CTX *t, void *src, size_t src_size)
Hi Simo.
Isn't this going to cause horrible prob
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 06:23:38AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > Nope. There's a challenge sent by either the server and then the client
> > produces a LM and NT response which is a hash of the challenge and the
> > user's password. This is sent to the server (in this case winbindd) for
>
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 04:47:17AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > The whole thing is based on the authentication used by any SMB client that
> > connects to a SMB server:
> > - The client connects to the server
> > - The server generates and sends some random bytes (challenge)
> > - The client
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 03:57:11PM -0400, Leducq Dominique wrote:
> Le Mercredi 20 F?vrier 2002 12:51, Tim Potter a ?crit :
> > Nmbd needs to be running on the local system as there are some lookup
> > requests send by winbindd that are sent by Windows NT domain controllers
>
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
