Hi,
Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
> Rene Rebe schrieb:
>> litlle girl wrote:
>>> AFE settings looks more stable:
>>>
>>> grep "\[gt68xx\] afe" ./*
>>> ./color-1.log:[gt68xx] afe 0x0f 0x04 0x10 0x05 0x0f 0x04
>>> ./color-2.log:[gt68xx]
Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-06-29 20:22:23 +0200, litlle girl gmail.com> wrote:
>> flatbed scanners are scanning moving head forward,
>> there in no reason to loose time on moving head backward useles,
>> next page can be scanned at head backward move,
>> and then fliped horizontally.
Hi all,
ExactImage 0.6(.0) now comes with an revamped PDF writer and hocr2pdf
front-end, together with a patch to cuneiform to annotate each
recognized
glyph with a hOCR-like bounding box, it allows the creation of pretty
exactly positioned, searchable PDF files:
ExactImage:
http://www.exac
Hi,
I have not forgotten your ACK :-) It's just the incredibly high
workload these days
(e.g. see Cuneiform / ExactImage, not to forget the T2 SDE :-)
I'll try to get some free Sunday soon to look at the Debian services
and our
automated scripts.
Yours,
Ren?
On 29.08.2008 at 17:17 m. all
Hi,
>> Binary incompatible and breaking would be silently data corruption or
>> no longer starting due to missing symbols etc.
>
> pseudocode:
>
> ret = sane_start()
> if(ret){
> die("bad status");
> }
>
> that works in sane 1.0, and fails in sane 1.1, both with the original
> binary, and with a
If there are just tiny, very light lines then there
is probably dust on the CCD glass, you can wipe it
clean with air or some clean soft towel.
Jacques Verhagen wrote:
> I have the same problem,
>
> It is not a Sane or Linux problem.
> With XP as os I get the same results
> I think it is a AV220
ed.
>
> Cheers,
> Gil
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Rene Rebe wrote:
>> Yeah - and you're still not using CVS ...
>>
>> AFAICS CVS is fine.
>>
>> On 25.11.2008, at 12:33, Zudio Solutions wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Rene, this is how ima
Yes, I should update that page, latest code is in SANE CVS.
On 25.11.2008, at 14:03, Wilhelm Meier wrote:
> Hi Rene,
>
> I get a 404 for
>
> http://svn.exactcode.de/sane-avision/trunk/backend
>
> --
>
> Am Dienstag 25 November 2008 schrieb Rene Rebe:
>> IIR
No it isn't.
On 08.04.2009, at 04:14, m. allan noah wrote:
> judging by the shell, I'd say thats really an Avision machine, very
> similar to fujitsu 4010CU. The avision backend is in need of a
> maintainer...
>
> allan
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Bryan Ward wrote:
>> I have a Xerox Docu
On 08.04.2009, at 10:22, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Rene Rebe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> No it isn't.
>
> Oh, really? We are eagerly waiting for avision bugfixes to start
> flowing into CVS. There's a release coming, so now would be a good
> time to start.
>
Hi,
On 08.04.2009, at 10:53, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Rene Rebe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I do not know of any bug that needs fixing. Using a proper non-Debian
>
> You must be kidding. What about the various versions of the HP 7400
> that stopped working after 1.0.18, for
On 08.04.2009, at 11:31, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Rene Rebe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> There are 2 7400 flavors and I think booth do work. The other mail on
>> the
>> list today apparently also boils down to "the linux usb subsystem got
>> confused", so?
>
m. allan noah wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Rene Rebe wrote:
>> No it isn't.
>> On 08.04.2009, at 04:14, m. allan noah wrote:
>>
>>> judging by the shell, I'd say thats really an Avision machine, very
>>> similar to fujitsu 4010CU. T
m. allan noah wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Rene Rebe wrote:
>>> Brian- I am sorry your query opened such a can of worms, this sort of
>>> thing is rather irregular. Perhaps Rene can answer your questions, now
>>> that he is here.
>> Well, the DM5
On 27.04.2009, at 12:50, PaulFransen wrote:
> On Sunday 12/04/2009 12:13 ono at safe-mail.net wrote:
> ---
>> I can try something like SnoopyPro
>> (http://sourceforge.net/projects/usbsnoop/), much later. I just
>> left town
>> for (probably)
I do not write to you directly. You probably subscribed to the SANE
mailing list. Unsusribe there, thanks,
On 28.04.2009, at 10:02, John Cotter wrote:
> Hello,
> Can you please take me off your distribution list manually? I get
> about 30
> of these per day. The unsubscribe option below does
ASAP.
On 22.05.2009, at 16:15, m. allan noah wrote:
> yes- git is taking me some time to get used to, but it is growing on
> me :)
>
> allan
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Rene Rebe wrote:
>> Yeah, noticed.
>>
>> I'll have to try the new git repo
Yeah, noticed.
I'll have to try the new git repository. Though one could copy the ID
to the .desc manually, but I'll really try to auto-update it timely.
On 22.05.2009, at 16:05, m. allan noah wrote:
> We'll have to ask Rene (cc'd) to update the .desc- the script is
> external to sane...
>
> al
Hi,
can you please use the normal usbsnoop tool and not whatever
"*pro" tool you are using? For the normal tool poeple use since
ages I have decoding scripts a-hand.
I think it is this one:
http://benoit.papillault.free.fr/usbsnoop/doc.php.en
Yours,
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 23:56, Serge Lebl
On Sunday 23 April 2006 01:05, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> I am using FC5 with sane-backends 1.0.17 and each colour scan with my HP
> 7400c has a yellow column of width 2-3 mm on the leftmost side of the
> scanned image. I have scanned with an alternative piece of software and
> here this yellow stripe
Hi,
On Sunday 23 April 2006 13:02, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> > Aside the stripe the image is completely fine? Does it only happen when
> > you scan the whole page? E.g. is due to some plastic on the side and the
> > other software just allow scanning a smaller region? Or does it happen
> > for scans
Hi,
On Sunday 23 April 2006 23:28, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> > On Sunday 23 April 2006 13:02, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> >>> Aside the stripe the image is completely fine? Does it only happen when
> >>> you scan the whole page? E.g. is due to some plastic on the side and
> >>> the other software just al
Hi,
On Friday 21 April 2006 09:51, Serge Leblanc wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 19:04 +0200, Rene Rebe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > can you please use the normal usbsnoop tool and not whatever
> > "*pro" tool you are using? For the normal tool poeple use since
&g
Hi,
On Friday 21 April 2006 09:51, Serge Leblanc wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 19:04 +0200, Rene Rebe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > can you please use the normal usbsnoop tool and not whatever
> > "*pro" tool you are using? For the normal tool poeple use since
&g
On Saturday 13 May 2006 20:53, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> fi-4010CU
Most probably Avision. Can you try adding the ID into the avision backend
and give it a try? A USB snoop of the window driver would be nice as well.
Yours,
--
Ren? Rebe - Rubensstr. 64 - 12157 Berlin (Europe / Germany)
Hi,
On Sunday 14 May 2006 04:39, Greg Furmanek wrote:
> Hi gang :-)
>
> I have been lurking on the list for quite some time. There are a
> lot of good info
> I got from you guys. I am just wondering if you have any
> recommendations when
> it comes to open source OCR libraries. It would be
On Monday 22 May 2006 20:50, moiti...@civil.ist.utl.pt wrote:
> > Hello Rene,
> > hello list,
> >
> > thanks for your answers.
> > At first i have deleted the hpusbsci in /lib/modules/2.4.31/kernel/
> > I have donwloaded the avision.c and avision.h of the svn repository of
> > the avision-backe
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 02:24, Wittawat Yamwong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why is usb_clear_halt() called unconditionally when usb_interrupt_read()
> returns an error? A possible error can be -ETIMEDOUT for example and in
> this case there is no need to call usb_clear_halt(). I've a problem that
> interrupt
Hi,
> From your first log we can see that the scanner is recognised. It sees that
> there is no film holder, it waits for the lamp to warm up, all perfect, and
> then it starts the calibration process. Everything seems to be ok, until we
> get to the portion that I am attaching. There we start hav
Hi,
as soon as I get a Avision based Minolta Elite 5400 which also has
a infrared channel I plan to add such support to the avision backend.
The data processing will (e.g. dust removal) will be most probably
added to the image library exact-image:
http://www.exactcode.de/oss/exact-image/
I'll
Hi,
any reason why the ChangeLog lists an old date for this commit?
1.2925 (ellert-g 06-Jun-06): 2006-05-26 Mattias Ellert
1.2925 (ellert-g 06-Jun-06):
1.2925 (ellert-g 06-Jun-06): * po/Makefile.in,
po/sane-backends.*.po: updated with translation
1.2925 (ellert-g
Hi,
sorry for the delay.
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 10:36, Jose Paulo Moitinho de Almeida wrote:
> > Using the version in the package (build 182) I had problems that seemed
> > very similar to your log, but with a (much) older version (build 99) I
> > could a scan without problems. From files that I
Hi,
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 19:35, m. allan noah wrote:
> > As far as I know, xsane automatically calculates and downloads a gamma
> > table for brightness / contrast / gamma if the backend advertises it.
>
> interesting! do you know of a backend that does this? i would like to see
> the option s
Hi,
some Avision AV600 or AV610. They are of reasonable high quality and scan even
faster.
And Avision is a very supporting company when it comes to Windows alternative
drivers.
Yours,
--
Ren? Rebe - Rubensstr. 64 - 12157 Berlin (Europe / Germany)
http://exactcode.de | http://t2-
Hi,
On Monday 24 July 2006 02:20, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> The ADF should be supported out of the box (assuming you use our RPMs,
> that is). BTW, our backend does NOT support scanning at resolutions
> larger than 3200dpi.
And are as binary only as the alc1100 CUPS driver that includes a GPL
b
On Monday 18 September 2006 18:26, Bertrik Sikken wrote:
> Tera Holler wrote:
> > Is hp scanjet 8290 unsupported? I would like to connect it to a HP
> > B2600 running hp-ux 11.11.
>
> I have no practical experience with this scanner, but the
> sane-project.org backend search engine says:
> http://
On Thursday 16 November 2006 14:19, Farley S. Kalp wrote:
> Can anyone get the workcentre m950 to work with linux?
If you have such a device you can dump the Windows driver i/o and send it to
me. I could tell you whether it is Avision based then.
Yours,
--
Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE - Berlin (Eur
Hi,
On Saturday 13 January 2007 10:20, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> John wrote:
> > I have a Minolta dimage III positive film scanner, which can take 4
> > positive frames at once.
> >
> > I have not been able to find any good software to use with this scanner.
> > Does anyone have a good hint?
>
> If y
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 19:38:58 Felix E. Klee wrote:
> At Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:52:55 +0100,
> Jens Gulden wrote:
> > - BUT: it scans right to one edge. Plustek claims to even have
> > patented this "invention"...
>
> You must've misunderstood me: I need a scanner that can scan right to
> the
Hi,
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 12:57:16 Felix E. Klee wrote:
> At Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:03:00 +0100,
> Rene Rebe wrote:
> > > You must've misunderstood me: I need a scanner that can scan right
> > > to the edge of the *glass plate*. In fact, before getting the Eps
Hi,
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 14:22:34 Felix E. Klee wrote:
> > > If I do not find such a scanner, I may have to build a stencil that
> > > I can put on my current scanner. Actually, this should not be too
> > > hard. I'm annoyed however, that this step is necessary. Why didn't
> > > Epson
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 23:30:37 Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
> Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
> > I need to scan visitors' plastic/laminate identification cards. The scans
> > are to be initiated via web app, signalling a headless SANE linux server
> > to scan via scanadf, network scanning, python PIL/sane, etc.
On Thursday 29 March 2007 19:44:45 Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
> m. allan noah wrote:
> > the kodak i30 and i40 are rebadged avision av200's, and i think
> > visioneer sells one too. i had a kodak i40 here for awhile, it works ok
> > with sane, but there were some 'pausing' or timeout issues when you
> >
Hi,
thanks, I'll go over them. Btw. nowadays virtually everyone rather
prefers unified diffs (diff -u) - but I can of course also read those :-)
On Monday 23 July 2007 16:25, David Solomon wrote:
> Here are the diffs:
>
> rx30 at dsolomon-devbox:~/nslu2/downloads/temp/sane-backends-1.0.18/backen
Have you counted thru how many developers are willing to rewrite
their code (backends, frontends, etc.) for this arbitrarily defined SANE
2 "thing" ?
My votes still are: preferably compatibly change SANE 1 or adopt
TWAIN for Linux.
On 27.03.2008, at 18:22, stef wrote:
> Hello,
>
> be
Hi,
On 28.03.2008, at 09:16, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:52:51 +0100
> Rene Rebe wrote:
>
>> Have you counted thru how many developers are willing to rewrite
>> their code (backends, frontends, etc.) for this arbitrarily defined
>> SANE
>>
Hi,
On 28.03.2008, at 11:52, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:34:22 +0100
> Rene Rebe wrote:
>
>>
>>> I believe that Stef has made very clear its intentions
>>> to go toward SANE 2. TWAIn for linux would be a complete
>>> rewrite of e
Hi Allan,
On 28.03.2008, at 14:46, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:22 PM, stef wrote:
>>Hello,
>>
>>before any work can start on SANE 2, the current proposal
>> has to be completed.
>
> and before we can complete it, we must acknowlege that it has not been
> to
Yours,
Ren?
> Best regards
> Oliver
>
> Am Freitag, den 28.03.2008, 08:52 +0100 schrieb Rene Rebe:
>> Have you counted thru how many developers are willing to rewrite
>> their code (backends, frontends, etc.) for this arbitrarily defined
>> SANE
>> 2 "th
Hi,
On 28.03.2008, at 18:40, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> "m. allan noah" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>>>- scanner's button handling
>>
>> this is overly complicated, and should be re-examined.
>
> For that and other reasons, I think it'd really be better to have the
> frontends be entirely isolated from
On 28.03.2008, at 19:02, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:49:17 +0100
> Rene Rebe wrote:
>
>>
>> Right now the only thing I miss are marks for infra-red frames, and
>> maybe
>> a ability to pass duplex data without buffering the rear side, w
Hi,
On 28.03.2008, at 19:09, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> ?tienne Bersac wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Do you mean having some cups for scanner ?
>
> Something much more simple than CUPS, but yeah, basically.
>
>> Actually, i wish not, because users don't want another service. HAL
>> can
>> launch addon per d
Hi,
On 28.03.2008, at 19:13, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Rene Rebe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Sounds a bit Data Source Manager like-ish (in TWAIN terms), definetly
>> and idea for desktops.
>
> Yes. From what you told about TWAIN the other day, I think I like the
> archit
On 28.03.2008, at 19:19, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Rene Rebe wrote:
>>
>> On 28.03.2008, at 19:02, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:49:17 +0100
>>> Rene Rebe wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>
On 28.03.2008, at 19:34, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Rene Rebe wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28.03.2008, at 19:19, m. allan noah wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Rene Rebe
>>> wrote:
>>&g
On 28.03.2008, at 21:56, stef wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it seems that the real question is what do we want for SANE future ?
>
> 1 - the current situation is perfectly fine, don't need to change a
> thing.
>
> 2 - only a couple of new image formats are needed, simply evolve a
Hi,
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 14:06, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Rene Rebe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday 02 October 2006 20:19, m. allan noah wrote:
> >> in order to get the kodak i40 (clone of av-220?) working with the
> >> avisi
Hi,
On Friday 06 October 2006 07:43, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Alexandre Averyanov writes:
> > I have purchased a Subj. This model is new one and not
> > supported by SANE yet but I hope it's similar to
> > Epson Perfection 3490/3590.
>
> It is not.
When we have such a pretty supported device pa
On Friday 06 October 2006 13:32, m. allan noah wrote:
> many scanners have internal limits on the length of a scan. even the
> high-dollar fujitsus usually have a 35 inch limit. this is not a driver
> problem, but a scanner firmware problem. you may be able to find some
> particular scanner that do
Hi,
On Friday 13 October 2006 02:47, Wolfram Heider wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 01:05:00 +0200, m. allan noah
>
> wrote:
> > fujitsu S500, or fi-5110C (or EOX derivatives)
> >
> > allan
>
> The Canon DR 1210C isn't in the list, so it may be unsupported. The HP
> scanjet is labelled unsupported.
Hi,
On Saturday 21 October 2006 01:14, Endicott Lovell wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I recently started using Linux, and have been trying to get my scanner
> to work for quite some time. I have an HP ScanJet 5300c. I am running
> sane 1.0.18 and sane-frontends 1.0.14.
>
> The sane website says that this
Hi,
On Saturday 21 October 2006 20:06, en wrote:
> Well, I don't have hpusb loaded. And trying it as root doesn't provide
> any different results. Any other ideas?
Nope. Maybe you hit a bug in the recent Linux kernels with USB 1 devices
behind USB 2 hubs.
What is the output of:
SANE_DEBUG_AVIS
Hi,
On Sunday 22 October 2006 22:02, en wrote:
> [avision] attach: opening libusb:001:004
> [avision] attach: open failed (Invalid argument)
> [avision] sane_init: Trying to find USB device 3f0 701 ...
> [avision] attach:
> [avision] attach: opening libusb:001:004
> [avision] attach: open failed (
Yes, the debug log would be welcome.
Sidenot: a backend, mine specifically, should not be able to interfere
with
Xorg. If Xorg crashes than more likely due to an bug allocating an
overly
large pixmap from XSane or Kooka or something like that. Though of corse
Xorg (the X server or an driver) s
HI,
On 03.04.2008, at 17:28, blizzi wrote:
> Hi i've got some more info about crash of kooka & xsane.
> its looks like you were right.
>
> this is part of my Xorg.0.log
>
> SetClientVersion: 0 9
> SetClientVersion: 0 9
> (II) Open ACPI successful (/var/run/acpid.socket)
> (II) APM registered succ
Hi,
On 04.04.2008, at 01:05, Tymoteusz wrote:
> m. allan noah pisze:
>> On 4/3/08, Tymoteusz wrote:
>>
Yeah, just that X segfaulted, does not tell much.
However, you could test with scanimage in a xterm (or variant) or
even
the console text terminal to check your
HI,
in the meantime we found the bug, some assignments got
lost during some merge window. I'll commit the a fix to
CVS today.
On 07.04.2008, at 02:42, Gabriele Gorla wrote:
> I don't have the debug log (I can post it later if
> necessary), but I the backend stopped working for me
> too on a comp
Hi,
On 09.04.2008, at 21:27, stef wrote:
> Le Wednesday 09 April 2008 12:48:22 Ren? Rebe, vous avez ?crit :
>
>>
>> As the backend controls the device and reads the image data somehow,
>> it should have knowledge about the actual head position and should be
>> able to perform the required actions
On 10.04.2008, at 21:33, stef wrote:
> Le Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:38:26, vous avez ?crit :
>>
>> You are still just arguing around the dancing cow here.
>>
>> With a potentially new sane_end whatever function you still would
>> have
>> to
>> keep track where the head is. A frontend may still
litlle girl wrote:
> Hi guyz,
> i recognize that win drivers dont calibrate my CIS scanner before scan.
> gt68xx backend is loosing about 20sec every time on calibrating!
> Is there any way to turn off gt68xx backend calibrating?
> Most stuff i scan at lineart and i don't need calibrating neither
>
litlle girl wrote:
>> The windows driver probably calibrates once, when the scanner is
>> first used, and stores the reference data somewhere (file, registry,
>> etc.).
>>
>> The SANE driver should try to do the same (not registry of course,
>> but some /var/... whatever file-system location.
>>
>>
litlle girl wrote:
> AFE settings looks more stable:
>
> grep "\[gt68xx\] afe" ./*
> ./color-1.log:[gt68xx] afe 0x0f 0x04 0x10 0x05 0x0f 0x04
> ./color-2.log:[gt68xx] afe 0x0f 0x04 0x10 0x05 0x0f 0x04
> ./color-3.log:[gt68xx] afe 0x0f 0x04 0x10 0x05 0x0f 0x04
> ./gray-1.log:[gt68xx] afe 0x0f 0x04
Hi,
On: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 08:29:56 -0400,
"Angela" wrote:
> Hello,
> =
> I would like to know if ADF option works on sane avision backend 1.0.=
12
> or 1.0.11 ?
The ADF options is in the backend for years (IIRC) and worked for many
scanners. Rcently some fixed for sheetfeed scanners went in.
Hi,
On: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 19:06:11 -0400,
"Angela Corridore" wrote:
> Hi,
> =
> I'm triying to use ADF switch on OS/2-Warp4 system with HP7450c, the =
command
> I'm using is :
> scanimage -d avision --format=3Dtiff --resolution=3D80 --adf=3Dyes =
1>a.tif 2>2.L
> =
> When I do this, my
Hello.
Your scanner might be possibly supported in a future version of the
Avision backend. At least the "ScanJet 5300C", "ScanJet 5370C" and
"scanjet 7400c" might be.
These scanners are Avision OEM scanners, using the Avision SCSI
protokol. I mainly waiting for HP to send me a test scanner (they
Security_Multipart(Sat_Jan_12_12:45:16_2002_076)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi. Sorry for the delay. I replyed yesterday, but the eMail disapeared
somewhere in the data-nirvana :-(
1. Your scanner might also be manufactured by Av
Security_Multipart(Wed_Jan_16_22:25:54_2002_998)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Kent Swan
Subject: [sane-devel] Avision Backend (HELP Need a copy of source)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:55:07 -0500
> I cannot seem to find a live
s only the avision-developer-sync
source. The homepage is:
http://drocklinux.dyndns.org/rene/avision/index.html
> Otherwise, Rene Rebe is probably the man to ask.
> =
> Bye,
> Henning
k33p h4ck1n6
Ren=E9
-- =
Ren=E9 Rebe (Registered Linux user: #248718 <http://counter.li.
Security_Multipart(Wed_Jan_16_23:54:17_2002_436)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all.
The gphoto2 backend fails in current CVS:
This is after a vanilla ./configure on a 2.4.17, glibc-2.1.3,
gcc-2.95.3 system (ROCK Linux).
Haveing
Security_Multipart(Thu_Jan_17_00:04:08_2002_276)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all!
I forgot to notify you that my old email adress: rene.rebe at
myokay.net (or even the older rene.rebe at okay.net?) is not available
anymore ...
Hi.
From: abel deuring
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Re: Avision backend
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:43:27 +0100
> Jose Paulo Moitinho de Almeida wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday 16 January 2002 23:44, Rene Rebe wrote:
> > > Hi all.
> > >
> > > I just merged our
From: abel deuring
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Re: Avision backend
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 20:34:55 +0100
> Rene Rebe wrote:
>
> > > > - hpusbscsi+sane+avision will not handle large transfers. It is
> > > > necessary to
> > > > use a large SANE_SG_BUFF
From: Oliver Rauch
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Tamarack 6000C slooow scanning
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:13:35 +0100
> "Andrei B." wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I already put this question when sane was at version 1.0.3
> > Yesterday I upgraded to sane-1.0.6 and tried again.
> > I have a Tamarack
Security_Multipart(Fri_Jan_25_18:38:03_2002_743)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: "Andrei B."
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Tamarack 6000C slooow scanning
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 00:06:58 -0800 (PST)
> Overall, there is a slight imp
Hi.
On: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 18:17:14 +0100,
Marcus Menzel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to this list and if there is a information source I could have looked
> up - let me know :) I tried the webpage and the archive.
>
> My problem started one week ago, as I turned one the maschine and sane
> coul
Hi all. Only for the log.
The problem was that Mandracke archives (tar cfz ...) the DevFS
device-nodes in /dev during a shutdown and deflates them during
reboot. So after adding an additional SCSI hard-disk the scanner's
device-node (ID 6) hat the same scsi-generic minor number as the new
hard-dis
Hi.
On: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 13:22:02 +0100,
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
[...]
> Don't get me wrong. I have nothing against mentioning gcc 3.x in the
> list. I will check for other reports (HP-UX 11.x anyone?) and include
> it sometime in the future.
>
> Two questions: Are C-libraries really inc
On: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 20:16:13 +0100,
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 02:26:08PM +0100, Simone wrote:
> > I've got an HP scanjet 7400c, which happend to be unsupported by sane.
> > Anyway I
> > would like to install it and use it with sane. Somebody has ever tr
Hi.
[...]
> Please add those I probably missed.
Avision
> As these updates don't need a change in sane/sane.h it can go into the
> current standard IMHO. As there is no real change in API, the version
> number would stay at 1.02.
>
> Comments?
>
> Bye,
> Henning
"Major A" wrote:
>
> There i
Hi.
The HP 5300 is an Avision OEM scanner labeled by HP.
This is the Avision backend page:
http://drocklinux.dyndns.org/rene/avision/index.html
Latest code can be obtained from:
http://www.rocklinux.org/people/rene/sane/
The HP 5300 does now work with SANE/Avision. I still try to track
prob
On: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 17:40:02 +0100,
Zied Fakhfakh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new to this mailing list,
>
> I know HP scanJet 7400C is not supported yet, is there a plan for it ?
The HP 7400C is an Avision OEM scanner labeled by HP.
This is the Avision backend page:
http://drocklinux.dyndn
Hi.
On: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 08:30:42 -0800,
"Art Fore" wrote:
> Hi Rene
>
> Nice website you have. Looks like you have alot to keep you busy.
Thanks. Yes - I have far too much things to keep me busy :-(
> Your info helped a great deal. Have the modules you mentioned. It looks like
> >from the
What unqualified statemant is this? Normally I do not reply to such a
garbage - because it is 99% wasted time ...
On: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 04:08:48 +0100,
scc wrote:
> Linux will never improve in that area. No one will be able to meet
> you on your level and will constantly refer you to rtfq. I'
HI all.
Is it possible that the sane release files are not on the server? At
least the german mirror is empty, the "gd.tuwien.ac.at" one only has
1.0.7 and m/tsx-11.it.edu only has files up to 1.0.1.
The main server is currently not repsonding ...
Maybe this needs some cleanup?
k33p h4ck1n6
R
Hi.
On: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 20:57:35 -0800,
Art Fore wrote:
> Hi Rene
>
> Got it going at last. I could not run sane-find-scanner, but got that fixed.
> Add a profile.local file to add to the path. Still xsane comes up with GTK+
> error about a module_path for libpixmap.so which is there. Will
Hi.
On: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:34:11 +0100,
Stefan Kornhuber wrote:
> hi!
>
> I have the usb scanner hp5300c, kernel 2.4.16 and sane 1.0.7 (back- and
> frontend)
>
> the output of find-scanner is
> # Note that find-scanner will find any scanner that is connected
> # to a SCSI bus. It will ev
On: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:24:59 +0100,
Stefan Kornhuber wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I use your avision.* files from your homepage and copied these files in the
> directory ..sane-backends-1.0.7/backend/
>
> Then I make distclean, configure --enable-scsibuffersize=32768, ...
Are you sure such a tiny buf
Hm. We fixed a bug in the go_home command although we never got this
nice debug help from sane ...?
This output seems to be from the original sane-1.7 version. Could you
try the latest version from my homepage? The go_home command is fixed,
you do not need the allow-usb option anymore - and many o
On: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 12:07:05 +0100,
Stefan Kornhuber wrote:
> Hi Rene!
>
> thx, now it functions, but I don't know why, because I made the same as
> yesterday.
>
> Now I have a new problem, because I think a configuration is false, but I
> don't know, what I must set.
This is _normal_. T
Hi.
I only wanted to mention that the Avision code was build upon the tamarack
backend. So during tracking the problem a diff might help ...
(btw. yes I will fix the two minor _bugs_ in the backend after the next
release ...)
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 18:40:19 +0100
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> 1.
1 - 100 of 256 matches
Mail list logo
