From: miles.on...@cirrus.comSent: October 12, 2017 5:52 PMTo: prmari...@gmail.com; jason.bron...@gmail.com; scientific-linux-users@fnal.govSubject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: scanner On 10/12/2017 04:42 PM, Paul Robert
Marino wrote:
Interestingly my
From: positiv...@gmx.comSent: October 12, 2017 5:51 PMTo: prmari...@gmail.comCc: jason.bron...@gmail.com; scientific-linux-users@fnal.govSubject: Re: scanner A single point of imaging would produce paralax -- if that matters.
Otherwise
On 10/12/2017 04:42 PM, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
Interestingly my father threw me for a loop on this now a days a low
grade digital camera actually has higher resolution than most scanners
so he uses one in a photo copy stand and then just copies the one file
to his computer via a bluetooth
: jason.bron...@gmail.comSent: October 12, 2017 5:26 PMTo: scientific-linux-users@fnal.govSubject: Re: scanner I'm currently using an older Epson Perfection with a reasonable degree of success. HP is probably going to be your best bet for any kind of stable use and long term support, though. It'll function
I'm currently using an older Epson Perfection with a reasonable degree of
success. HP is probably going to be your best bet for any kind of stable
use and long term support, though. It'll function correctly on about
anything until the unit dies from mechanical failure.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 08:31:05AM -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>Anyone have a favorite flat bed scanner that is SL friendly?
Look at HP All-in-One devices. I've used several models with
"HP OfficeJet Pro" in the model name. I only use the scan function
and it's working fine with Xsane, also
